- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
- Messages
- 1,242
Most city and state police do. Then prosecutors indict a couple for doing their job and officers quit the team.
Everyone feels this way about police who enforce laws they want to violate.Kinda COVID related, more related to a Cop being a jackwagon. Hope he enjoys losing his job.
Everyone feels this way about police who enforce laws they want to violate.
Yes, it was.Sure.. but this wasn't a law.
Ordinance
A law, statute, or regulation enacted by a Municipal Corporation.
An ordinance is a law passed by a municipal government. A municipality, such as a city, town, village, or borough, is a political subdivision of a state within which a municipal corporation has been established to provide local government to a population in a defined area.
Nothing about this challenges what I said.a violation of a city ordinance is not criminal and at best a fine.
This often happens when dealing with noncompliant lawbreakers.The cop quite literally escalated and continued to escalate inside a private establishment.
And he is welcome to challenge that officer on his home turf - in court.He also suggested that he was not being cooperative after he had been disarmed and was indeed just standing there.
And if he wants to argue compliance in court against the camera footage, well.. good luck to him, then!The moment the officer began the encounter he was hostile to the dude. He literally left the building, then the officer chased him with his taser drawn and was a complete and utter dickhead. He was literally compliant.
Where did this happen at?Kinda COVID related, more related to a Cop being a jackwagon. Hope he enjoys losing his job.
Yes, it was.
Ordinance
Nothing about this challenges what I said.
This often happens when dealing with noncompliant lawbreakers.
And he is welcome to challenge that officer on his home turf - in court.
Hard-pressed to start off any more respectfully than, rather than just arresting someone actively breaking the law in front of signs explaining that it was illegal to do so, instead breathing an audible sigh before asking him where his mask was, stating that it was illegal not to be wearing one inside, and telling him to leave until he had one.Maybe if he started the encounter with the slightest bit of mutual respect.
I think you’re grabbing at straws. It wasn’t just an audible sigh, he was barking a rhetorical question at him.Hard-pressed to start off any more respectfully than, rather than just arresting someone actively breaking the law in front of signs explaining that it was illegal to do so, instead breathing an audible sigh before asking him where his mask was, stating that it was illegal not to be wearing one inside, and telling him to leave until he had one.
Where did this happen at?
Cop just pissed off another pro-cop individual.
If he has a Concealed Carry license in Texas that then allows him to open carry, apparently since 2016.I’m curious about the gun. Last time I was there, Texas wasn’t an open carry state.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the city/county/whatever decided to go with “brandishing” just to save face and justify the tazer.
Makes sense why I wouldn’t know. Left the New Mexico/Texas area in 2015. Thanks for the info.@Florida173 found it. Waco, Texas.
If he has a Concealed Carry license in Texas that then allows him to open carry, apparently since 2016.
Open Carry | AustinTexas.gov.
Wrong on so many levels. Gov has superseded all county/city mask ordinances with a State order.Hard-pressed to start off any more respectfully than, rather than just arresting someone actively breaking the law in front of signs explaining that it was illegal to do so, instead breathing an audible sigh before asking him where his mask was, that it was illegal to have one, and that he needed to leave until he had one.
Your nitpicking of my word choice didn't actually affect my point, so I didn't understand why you were making the distinction if you weren't addressing it.My point being that he wasn't committing a criminal act, but a municipal violation punishable by a fine. But thank you for being pedantic
Because he didn't provide a medical reason, and it is reasonable to ask someone why they are breaking a law if an exemption to it isn't immediately apparent.I think you’re grabbing at straws. It wasn’t just an audible sigh, he was barking a rhetorical question at him.
To play devil’s advocate, how did he know that the gentleman didn’t have a medical reason preventing him from wearing a mask? ADA laws protect people like that.