Good work Sir.
Looking at the watch, it's pretty easy on the eyes and appears at least slightly functional. Personally though, I wouldn't wear it for the emblem alone - I feel it gives the wrong impression regardless of the intentions but those are my feelings.
At minimum - it serves more purpose than a Raider badge/device. It'd be pretty cool if Oris could send a shipment over to you guys or make it a "welcome to the gun club" thing (similar to the rolex submarine of the old Richard Marcinko era?)
Most of all I'm glad they've made the situation right with the community.
R/
H/A
@Teufel I spoke with one of the guys who was wearing one of the watches, and according to him there was no special price given to them for the watch; after they wore it, they had to return it. Additionally, there were only 3 Marines testing the watch and 1/3 of the testers said the whole thing was a joke.
They definitely paid HQMC for the logo. I don't know what that cost them but I'm sure it wasn't cheap. I think 4th Force is more at fault than Oris here. They should have suggested they donate money to some recon charities instead of settling for heavily discounted watches. This also touches on a reservist vs active duty nerve as well. I don't think one of the active duty units would have approached this the same way. They would have at least opened up this special deal to the rest of the recon units instead of hoarding it at one company.Curious what Oris paid HQMC to use the Recon name and to be "the official watch." In the past the Marine Corps has been very touchy feeley on their likeliness, to include telling Marines they cant use an EGA on businesses they've created.