Elon Musk to step back from Doge as Tesla profits plunge
Does this mean I don’t have to submit my 5 weekly bullet points?
Does this mean I don’t have to submit my 5 weekly bullet points?
I won't lie, but midpoints were so easy to write after all those bullets. Lol.Elon Musk to step back from Doge as Tesla profits plunge
Does this mean I don’t have to submit my 5 weekly bullet points?
Thanks to Elon for his remarkable and unprecedented service to this nation. He's the shining example of someone that came here, gained success, and gave back.Elon Musk to step back from Doge as Tesla profits plunge
Does this mean I don’t have to submit my 5 weekly bullet points?
I'm confused by your metaphorical use of potatoes...
In some context an intellectual potato could refer to someone that is generally uninteresting, dull, unintelligent, or even unattractive - this is the environment where I excel - but it could also refer to the concept of a "smart potato" used in marketing and technology given the current trends in artificial intelligence and machine learning - things that I know nothing about.
Then of course since this IS a thread about the Trump Administration and thus the wide spread issue of mental health comes into play - it could even be referring to "sentient potatoes" - a playful way to describe oneself as a means of avoiding labels.
Maybe a sentient potato is just struggling to embrace a more fluid sense of identity...
...am I a radical follower of the MAGA today?
...am I feeling a twinge of TDS today?
...do I feel like a never Trumper today?
...did SecDef send those messages on Signal because he thought he was drunk texting AOC?
...did I forget to take my blood pressure meds?
...would I care to see a photo of Hillary in a revealing string bikini?
...how about now?
Is it possible that an interweb full of dank memes could be the glue that binds us all together and heals our deep seeded cultural and political wounds? Is it possible that we have gone from 4D chess to 7D chess to 11D chess and this is all just part of President Trumps plan ???
...does anybody have a photo of Hillary in a revealing string bikini?
I'm going to type a phrase my wife says to me on an almost daily basis:
What the fuck is wrong with you?
I'm going to type a phrase my wife says to me on an almost daily basis:
What the fuck is wrong with you?
Back away @AWP. He's going to start channeling Frank S. Don't push him over the edge.I am curious though - what was it about my post that crossed the line?
Was it my query about the bikini photo?
I feel like it may have been the query about the bikini photo.
Priapism is a bitch.and when I think of Hillary, the next thing that pops into in my head is that mother fucking "revealing string bikini image"
...then I can't sleep for two or three days
re: Hegseth leakers.
The man talking is a DoD Branch Chief- not super high up, but high enough up to not to be insubordiante on video cause he's on a date and being horny.
The video is damning enough- but here is my takeaway. How many of the arguments on these pages sound like this guy? Is this "resistance in support of the constitution," or is this anti-American sedition, undermining the administration from a position of power openly?
If it's the latter, and your argument against the SECDEF (appointed by the sole head of the Executive, the one person in America that every citizen votes for, and enacts the will of the populace) sounds like his- maybe you should really explore your argument and look internally. When your talking points align exactly with what @Marauder06 would label a great example of NOT the "deep state", maybe think about your internal biases.
To loosely quote my man Young Gerald- "Most of y'all should probably party less and focus more, and if my post resonates then you're the one I wrote it for." I had no one person or group in mind, but if this post makes you feel some type of way, then I am definitely talking to you.
He is probably high enough that he can be fired.re: Hegseth leakers.
The man talking is a DoD Branch Chief- not super high up, but high enough up to not to be insubordiante on video cause he's on a date and being horny.
The video is damning enough- but here is my takeaway. How many of the arguments on these pages sound like this guy? Is this "resistance in support of the constitution," or is this anti-American sedition, undermining the administration from a position of power openly?
If it's the latter, and your argument against the SECDEF (appointed by the sole head of the Executive, the one person in America that every citizen votes for, and enacts the will of the populace) sounds like his- maybe you should really explore your argument and look internally. When your talking points align exactly with what @Marauder06 would label a great example of NOT the "deep state", maybe think about your internal biases.
To loosely quote my man Young Gerald- "Most of y'all should probably party less and focus more, and if my post resonates then you're the one I wrote it for." I had no one person or group in mind, but if this post makes you feel some type of way, then I am definitely talking to you.
And that is all that's required. Everyone is allowed to like or dislike the admin- I am supportive of that.Calling the National Guard a "side hustle" discredits everything he says and he can go fuck himself. The 400 thousand+ Guardsmen should be pissed. Not like they stayed home and didn't die over the last 20-ish years...
I strongly disagree with SOME of the SECDEF's policies but I execute them faithfully. Why? Because his appointment is lawful. A Branch Chief is very low on the totem pole and usually a GS-14. This clown speaking out is like a cashier at Target/ Walmart/ Best Buy complaining about the CEO.
For the record I work around GS-12/ 13 equivalents. Some have very strong opinions about the current leadership and you know what they do? Show up to work and do their jobs.
I watched the video.re: Hegseth leakers.
The man talking is a DoD Branch Chief- not super high up, but high enough up to not to be insubordiante on video cause he's on a date and being horny.
The video is damning enough- but here is my takeaway. How many of the arguments on these pages sound like this guy? Is this "resistance in support of the constitution," or is this anti-American sedition, undermining the administration from a position of power openly?
If it's the latter, and your argument against the SECDEF (appointed by the sole head of the Executive, the one person in America that every citizen votes for, and enacts the will of the populace) sounds like his- maybe you should really explore your argument and look internally. When your talking points align exactly with what @Marauder06 would label a great example of NOT the "deep state", maybe think about your internal biases.
To loosely quote my man Young Gerald- "Most of y'all should probably party less and focus more, and if my post resonates then you're the one I wrote it for." I had no one person or group in mind, but if this post makes you feel some type of way, then I am definitely talking to you.