Sitting President. Makes up intel. To subvert the will of the American people.
That’s the story. That’s the only story.
That’s the story. That’s the only story.
She is moving the HQ to Tennessee because the cost of doing business in California is high, and we're not talking about taxes.Why is Lynsi leaving California?
She is moving the HQ to Tennessee because the cost of doing business in California is high, and we're not talking about taxes.
The issue however with with all these states that create policies to attract businesses is those businesses bring voters that change the fabric of those states. Voters that vote for policies that made their previous states complete hell holes.
That's a good point. It's happening all over Mexico, just with white Americans buying or renting out things that Mexicans could afford pre-pandemic but no longer can. To the point where there are protests have been occurring off and on for a few years: 'Gringo go home.' Mexico City protests target Americans, gentrificationI’d call it the housing equity effect if it were me. People can take the equity out of their homes and retire early, move to a lower cost area and imbue their California values into those new areas.
That's a good point. It's happening all over Mexico, just with white Americans buying or renting out things that Mexicans could afford pre-pandemic but no longer can. To the point where there are protests have been occurring off and on for a few years: 'Gringo go home.' Mexico City protests target Americans, gentrification
She's clearly stated that she doesn't want to raise her family in California. Financial is a big part of it all, but let's not sugar coat it and make it the only reason. She can pay the bills. Values are not aligned. As I understand it the HQ will remain in CA? I've listened to many podcasts with her, she's not happy in California.She is moving the HQ to Tennessee because the cost of doing business in California is high, and we're not talking about taxes.
She is moving the HQ to Tennessee because the cost of doing business in California is high, and we're not talking about taxes.
The issue however with with all these states that create policies to attract businesses is those businesses bring voters that change the fabric of those states. Voters that vote for policies that made their previous states complete hell holes.
She's clearly stated that she doesn't want to raise her family in California. Financial is a big part of it all, but let's not sugar coat it and make it the only reason. She can pay the bills. Values are not aligned.
4 of the largest dots do not have a state income tax and AZ is the lowest of those that do (like OR and CO). People are moving to where they aren't taxed to the moon and back. 3 of those states are adjacent to CA so people are moving but remaining close to family and friends. You know this being in AZ and all, but it is rocket surgery for others.
And the lady moving to TN...another state w/o a state income tax. Double-edged sword though because employers will pay a little less in some areas as a result. In FL it doesn't help too that a lot of revenue is driven by tourism.
GotchaThat's my point. It's not about the taxes. Obviously Tennessee are also giving In N Out tax incentives to move corporate HQ as well.
Being close to my parents in case something crazy happens is very helpful. Something Texas certainly did not provide.
She's clearly stated that she doesn't want to raise her family in California. Financial is a big part of it all, but let's not sugar coat it and make it the only reason. She can pay the bills. Values are not aligned. As I understand it the HQ will remain in CA? I've listened to many podcasts with her, she's not happy in California.
I can see that happening if she is still as hands-on as she is now and if she stays in Tennessee.You'll likely see it flip-flop in the next 5-10 years where the corporate HQ is in TN and it becomes a regional one in CA.
It seems like the main corporate HQ is going to stay in CA, while they build up a regional HQ in TN. You'll likely see it flip-flop in the next 5-10 years where the corporate HQ is in TN and it becomes a regional one in CA.
I can see that happening if she is still as hands-on as she is now and if she stays in Tennessee.
It'll be interesting to see the effect this has on In N Out. I like the food, but I think part of the appeal for people in the eastern states is the fact that you want something you can't have. It's sure to be fun for awhile.
I can see that happening if she is still as hands-on as she is now and if she stays in Tennessee.
It'll be interesting to see the effect this has on In N Out. I like the food, but I think part of the appeal for people in the eastern states is the fact that you want something you can't have. It's sure to be fun for awhile.
Other way around. Corporate HQ is in Irvine, that office is being sunsetted. Baldwin Park "Burger University" is remaining open because the primary mission of the facility is employee training.
One fun lil wrinkle is something I’ve talked about before, and others have as well- precedent.
We’ve arrested former President and put them on trial. People (on this page!) celebrate it.
Too bad it’s the right that has the opportunity, which we know they won’t take.
Biden wasn’t behind the pardon, his staff was. The CIA, FBI, NSA and larger IC made up crimes at the direction and approval of Obama to spy on not just an American, but an American president.
Seems to me that those things are more egregious than, say, a campaign donation or a real estate valuation.
Agree. Nobody is going to do anything about it except drag it on until they want us to forget about it, then introduce the next outrage. Rinse and repeat.I'd say it was timed to attempt to move the topic off of Epstein
Susie Wiles, by all accounts, is a savage. The real question is how much power/authority does she have, I suppose.It'd be great to actually see something come from this, but like that'll ever happen.
Like, even on the conservative subs I'm seeming comments about this being outside the statute of limitations for charges, or how the SC ruling on immunity means you'd have to impeach Obama (impossible) to charge him. Numerous jokes about how this will be on Bondi's desk and lost in 4 months, or asking if these documents also include where Obama wrote the Epstein files.
I'd say it was timed to attempt to move the topic off of Epstein, but to your early point, why release it on a Friday where it gets basically minimal coverage?
Maybe Trump's COS is just not great at keeping the cabinet members coordinated? They seem to keep making comments/releasing stuff without others (or even Trump on occasion) knowing what's going on.