Ok... so then why all the outrage? Was this a nothingburger? Or was it a national security issues?@amlove21 Security breach of the highest order =/= collateral secret.
There isn't a rulebook for this. There isn't any type of flow chart. Each security incident is different. And there is absolutely a difference between a leak and a spill. What led to the spill? What led to the leak? Was anything leaked? Who did their on boarding? Their security training? Are there even records of that training? What did the training cover? Did it cover this scenario? What was the classification of the info? What was the fall out? Was anything compromised? There's a million other questions and it's all weighed to determine the final outcome.
Someone in the group chat saw something they shouldn't have. That someone was put there by Alex Wong. He's to blame for the information being seen. The cabinet shouldn't be conducting business on Signal, but that's their perogative, and their risk to accept. At our level, we cannot accept that risk; we're not authorized to.
SECDEF isn't getting fired. Waltz isn't getting fired. The journalist isn't going to jail. Worst case Alex Wong gets fired and we move on.
In this nebulous set of rules that now apparently doesn't exist we spent 4 days (without reading the actual full text of the chat for about 3 of those days) saying in very black and white terms that this was a violation. Hegseth was stupid and everyone on the chat shared secrets and it was spillage. Now, when it comes to the meat and potatoes of accountability (which we all *say* we want)- NOW there is all this nuance and context and things we have to consider?
Now we are at the end of this one- no one is getting fired, or charged, or held accountable in any way it seems. Which means- we just wasted 8 pages of rage for nothing.
Your bolded could have been the only post on this issue when this story broke a week ago.
ETA- You're correct about a leak vs spill- you said yourself we have both and neither party will be held accountable.