The Trump Presidency 2.0

[Marauder06]

Much like our first-ever Assistant Deputy Director of the FBI, I am an outputs guy.

I'd like the Russia/Ukraine war to end. Speaking specifically to the rhetoric and semantics of the forward facing statements of the administration while we negotiate, if playing nice gets us there, +1.

Well, that, and anytime anyone wants to force another person to use the words the insist upon lest the speaker be shamed for it, I am naturally resistant. I am contrarian like that.

I think that's just your white privilege talking ;)

 

[amlove21]

I think that's just your white privilege talking ;)

Guilty as charged. I will self-flagellate accordingly. Struggle session inbound...

 

[AWP]

In all fairness, most of the FBI was super busy going through Melania's underwear and Barron's room to think this through, give them a break.

Plot twist: Barron's underwear and Melania's room.

 

[Marauder06]

 

[amlove21]

 

[Muppet]

Enjoy

 

[Blizzard]

I don't think those two things are mutually exclusive. I agree with the first bolded sentence and unequivocally concur with your assessment of Russia/Putin. But at the end of the day, what is in our best national interests? Do we want ANOTHER forever war that, over time, will most likely involve US troops getting killed or our other interests asymmetrically attacked, or do we want to draw a firm line in the sand that reaches the best possible alternative outcome. where we can move on to things that are more important and are a better use of our time, effort, and money?

Concur. They aren't mutually exclusive at all. That's kind of my point. Maybe I'm just one of these Polly-Anna-ish fools, but integrity is still important to me.

Surely, the great negotiator can find a way to gain agreement to end the war while still keeping America's ideals and integrity intact, right? That's not a particularly overly complicated ask.

 

[Kraut783]

I could get behind this except the FBI has had 5(?) years to scrub the data and release pertinent information. This was also an easy W for the Biden’s.

What is everyone hiding?

Turned out it was a Mossad operation?

 

[Marauder06]

Concur. They aren't mutually exclusive at all. That's kind of my point. Maybe I'm just one of these Polly-Anna-ish fools, but integrity is still important to me.

Surely, the great negotiator can find a way to gain agreement to end the war while still keeping America's ideals and integrity intact, right? That's not a particularly overly complicated ask.

Integrity is still important to me personally. That's why I didn't vote for President Trump the first time he ran. But at the national level, there are things that are far more important to me, like not devolving into a far-left dystopia. If there were someone other than Trump who can deliver the kinds of things that Trump can deliver, and more importantly prevent the kinds of jackassery that were happening in the last 4+ years, I'd vote for him/her. Regardless of party. But we've got what we've got. And if you're going to give me a binary choice, that's an easy one for me to make.

 

[amlove21]

Integrity is still important to me personally. That's why I didn't vote for President Trump the first time he ran. But at the national level, there are things that are far more important to me, like not devolving into a far-left dystopia. If there were someone other than Trump who can deliver the kinds of things that Trump can deliver, and more importantly prevent the kinds of jackassery that were happening in the last 4+ years, I'd vote for him/her. Regardless of party. But we've got what we've got. And if you're going to give me a binary choice, that's an easy one for me to make.

I am personally done winning a game that no one else is playing.

I'll take the outputs and worry about ancillary issues later.

 

[Topkick]

If there were someone other than Trump who can deliver the kinds of things that Trump can deliver, and more importantly prevent the kinds of jackassery that were happening in the last 4+ years, I'd vote for him/her.

but integrity is still important to me.

I can't think of a president in my lifetime with impeccable integrity.

 

[Topkick]

Russia/Putin is anything other than an imperialistic aggressor that invaded it's neighbor is more than intellectually dishonest -- it's flat-out denial of reality.

True but I think Biden gave Putin permission when he said a "minor incursion" was basically OK. Now here we are.

 

[Blizzard]

I can't think of a president in my lifetime with impeccable integrity.

That's because there are none.

To @Marauder06's previous point, I don't necessarily need them to be impeccable either, but at least act like we have a moral compass. We don't have a problem calling out the UK on their free speech bullshit. So, why is this so difficult?

That said, we can all probably agree there's a significant difference between completely disregarding reality while reiterating a false narrative from one of the bad actors vs. simply taking a position that it's in everyone's interest to end the war. It's kind of akin to kids fighting, "I don't care who started it, it ends now."

 

[Topkick]

It's kind of akin to kids fighting, "I don't care who started it, it ends now."

The last administration wanted this war. I don't believe Putin would've invaded if they didn't provoke it. It's just my opinion.

 

[AWP]

Turned out it was a Mossad operation?

 

[Blizzard]

The last administration wanted this war. I don't believe Putin would've invaded if they didn't provoke it. It's just my opinion.

Non-concur. I'm not a fan of the last administration in any way, shape, or form, but this was all Putin. Evidence? Georgia and Crimea,

 

[Jaknight]

Non-concur. I'm not a fan of the last administration in any way, shape, or form, but this was all Putin. Evidence? Georgia and Crimea,

I think Putin saw the perfect moment to strike—the West was still reeling from COVID, the chaos of the 2020 election, and everything felt unstable. Meanwhile, Ukraine was already cozying up to her new boyfriend, and before she could get a NATO ring on it, he decided it was the right time for a “special operation.”

 

[Topkick]

Non-concur. I'm not a fan of the last administration in any way, shape, or form, but this was all Putin. Evidence? Georgia and Crimea,

Cool, we'll have to disagree on this one. I don't trust Putin but going back to the 2014 coup in Ukraine, it's not all on Putin.

 

[Kraut783]

I think Putin saw the perfect moment to strike—the West was still reeling from COVID, the chaos of the 2020 election, and everything felt unstable. Meanwhile, Ukraine was already cozying up to her new boyfriend, and before she could get a NATO ring on it, he decided it was the right time for a “special operation.”

Agree....he took Crimea and nobody complained...

 

[RackMaster]

Non-concur. I'm not a fan of the last administration in any way, shape, or form, but this was all Putin. Evidence? Georgia and Crimea,

Ukraine was about to kick Russia out of Crimea, which they had a presence since 1783. They kinda had an argument to keep it.

I'm willing to bet Georgia, Ossetia, Chechnya, etc. were all instigated by the USAiD and the CIA. Ironically, under Clinton's rain. Hillary Clinton has had a hard on for Putin for years.