The Trump Presidency 2.0

Interesting snippet from the article...

"The polling is the first time in the company’s history that a majority believes the country is on the right track."
Ever.

You know, I am starting to think that the very loud minority of people that gasp and clutch their pearls at everything this admin does isn't actually representative of the majority of the country. It's almost like (follow me here)... it's almost like there is a coordinated effort to make fringe opinions seem like they're the majority opinion and every time I see more data that counteracts that narrative, it makes me think so even more.

Anywhoo
 
To highlight a broader swath of polls: He's sitting around a 46% average.

Given how polarizing he is, this is (arguably) more impressive than Rasmussen rating him over 50%.
I am not gonna use a word like "stunning" or "shocking" especially with everything going on, but that approval rating is wild. Given the context of the zeitgeist.
 
Are we tired of winning yet? @Marauder06 ARE WE?!?! I, for one, am not.

Spin this however you want, the numbers are what the numbers are.

Trump's approval rating hits new high as 50% of voters say America is on the right track
America knew that things like DEI, mass uncontrolled illegal immigration, runaway inflation, and the Afghanistan withdrawal debacle weren't right. Even the zealots knew it in their hearts. It just took a permission structure for them to say it.
 
Federal court blocks Trump from imposing sweeping tariffs under emergency powers law

The ruling from a three-judge panel at the New York-based U.S. Court of International Trade came after several lawsuits arguing Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs exceeded his authority and left the country’s trade policy dependent on his whims.

Made me question what this New York-based U.S. Court of International Trade was...

...is a U.S. federal court that adjudicates civil actions arising out of U.S. customs and international trade laws.
...may also decide any civil action against the U.S. government, its officers, or its agencies arising out of any law connected to international trade.

So since they are civil, I'd imagine there has to be some actual injured parties here. Nope.. nothing injured yet.. a couple small businesses and states that are worried about it.

These journalists are such trash with biased negative framing. You'd think journalists could understand the nuance of trade negotiations. It's not like the administration, especially Scott Bessent, hasn't been incredibly transparent on how this is all good.
 

Honest questions because I don't know how it all works.

Biden is clearly, and was while in office, living with a severe loss of cognitive functions. It doesn't take a genius to figure out those closest to him covered it up and used the media to spread lies and misinformation.

So how do you do anything about it IF you even have some venue to pursue a case? Who ran the country while a vegetable was nominally in charge? (Yes, we know but what can someone prove?)

I'd love to see people go down even if it was a charge for abusing the elderly, but is there even a mechanism to address a president AFTER they are out of office?
 
Honest questions because I don't know how it all works.

Biden is clearly, and was while in office, living with a severe loss of cognitive functions. It doesn't take a genius to figure out those closest to him covered it up and used the media to spread lies and misinformation.

So how do you do anything about it IF you even have some venue to pursue a case? Who ran the country while a vegetable was nominally in charge? (Yes, we know but what can someone prove?)

I'd love to see people go down even if it was a charge for abusing the elderly, but is there even a mechanism to address a president AFTER they are out of office?
only if their last name is "Trump."
 
I'd love to see people go down even if it was a charge for abusing the elderly, but is there even a mechanism to address a president AFTER they are out of office?

IDK, but he pardoned everybody he could think of--or that his handlers could think of--so who's left to take the fall?
 
Trump is the captain of a ship with a mutinous crew. For those wondering, I will take either an espionage charge or a sedition charge here. I prefer espionage, because sedition doesn't carry the death penalty as a maximum. If this young man shared national defense secrets with a foreign government, grease the gallows trap door.

His motivation for sharing the secrets? He "didn't agree or align with the current administration."

US IT specialist arrested after attempting to share classified information with foreign government: DOJ
 
Trump is the captain of a ship with a mutinous crew. For those wondering, I will take either an espionage charge or a sedition charge here. I prefer espionage, because sedition doesn't carry the death penalty as a maximum. If this young man shared national defense secrets with a foreign government, grease the gallows trap door.

His motivation for sharing the secrets? He "didn't agree or align with the current administration."

US IT specialist arrested after attempting to share classified information with foreign government: DOJ
These types of stories only reflect the dumbasses who got caught. No telling how many times this happens when the perpetrator is successful.

It's also interesting to me that they didn't mention the name of the country that the FBI was false-flagging as.
 
Back
Top