Single Malt
Unverified
Referencing Christopher S. Koper, “An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Impacts on Gun Markets and Gun Violence, 1994-2003.”
His findings were that the exceptions to the ban were the reason the ban didn't show significant short term results. He also concluded that the laws were written to be on-going and that there is evidence of long term effect. Gun violence (even suicide) is an issue in US that should be addressed rationally and this ban did show some promise. I personally don't think assault rifles are an issue whatsoever, but think that handguns are more of an issue as they count for the majority of gun-related crime. So yes, the Clinton ban didn't do any miracle but it was the closest thing to a law that worked, and showed some promise in the long term. As far as interpreting the results, the truth falls somewhere between LaPierre's and Feinstein's interpretations of the same study.
His findings were that the exceptions to the ban were the reason the ban didn't show significant short term results. He also concluded that the laws were written to be on-going and that there is evidence of long term effect. Gun violence (even suicide) is an issue in US that should be addressed rationally and this ban did show some promise. I personally don't think assault rifles are an issue whatsoever, but think that handguns are more of an issue as they count for the majority of gun-related crime. So yes, the Clinton ban didn't do any miracle but it was the closest thing to a law that worked, and showed some promise in the long term. As far as interpreting the results, the truth falls somewhere between LaPierre's and Feinstein's interpretations of the same study.