Brill
SOF Support
20% of awards classified? Wow, never knew it was that high.
Almost 20% of top medals awarded secretly since 9/11
Almost 20% of top medals awarded secretly since 9/11
Almost 20% of top medals awarded secretly since 9/11
- Thread starter Brill
- Start date
20% sounds about right to me given the nature of the warfare, and, one would assume, the level of risk involved.
I'd bet there have been more covert missions since 9/11 than at any other comparable time in our history.
I'd bet there have been more covert missions since 9/11 than at any other comparable time in our history.
Last edited:
TLDR20
Verified SOF
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 6,235
20% sounds about right to me given the nature of the warfare, and, one would assume, the level of risk involved.
I'd bet there have been more covert missions since 9/11 than at any other comparable time in our history.
(And probably more tell-all memoirs of said covert operations by participants who can't seem to wait for declassification.)
Yeah covert only because of who conducted them. Most of what they are earning medals for are raids, infantry units conduct those. Just saying.
Got it. If an SOF unit conducts it it's classified even if it's the kind of operation infantry might get a press mention for...
All of my deployment awards except one are "classified" and I never even fired my weapon once. Like TLDR20 said it's often simply a function of the unit more than the actions.
SASR, 2 Commando Regiment and SOER are heavily represented in gallantry awards too, for the same reasons, however their awards are still announced during the Australia Day and Queen's Birthday announcements. They hide the names of the recipients (MG for Sgt H, SASR, or DSC for Maj K, 2 Cdo etc etc) but location and date are still mentioned.
Are these 20% being hidden entirely?
Are these 20% being hidden entirely?
Devildoc
Verified Military
Thinking the same thing.
Serious question: if the awards are for classified events/missions/operations/whatever, are the awards themselves secret so one cannot wear it, or can they wear it and if asked, say they cannot speak to it because it's a secret?
I read this and thought of all the MOHs and other high-level awards given decades after the fact for missions that have been declassified, e.g., Roy Benavidez's MOH for his actions with MACV-SOG.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2012
- Messages
- 12,825
Good question - I've read about this in books (both fiction and non-fiction) and always wondered if true -
TLDR20
Verified SOF
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 6,235
They wear them, if and when they wear their A's. See the pic of MSGT Wheeler. He is obviously blinged out, but you won't find the award write ups for most of those BSM-V's.
I have a simple plan.
Products
and
Amazon.com: The Mountain Three Wolf Moon Short Sleeve Tee: Clothing
There was some discussion at DoD to substitute the administrative Bronze Star (the one without the "V") with Nickleback T-shirts. Not sure how that turned out.
I haven't been in every organization out there, but in the units I was in the awards and evals had a classified component that was held in the classified channels, and publicly releasable one. So the awards certs are given, the verbiage on them is it just super vague. And on the evals, there's the admin data and the "block check," everything else was classified.
Kraut783
SOF Support
an example of super vague.....JCOM for OEF 2002 simply says "For Meritorious Service for the Armed Forces of the United States" that's it, no locations (Astan) no operation name (OEF), nothing... No real classified stuff...but it was all SOF.
Similar threads
- Deleted member 2517
- General Discussion
