Charlie Kirk shooting -

amlove21 said:
You know, for two dudes in the very hip college scene under 25, those text messages were completely clear of all abbreviations and "kid-speak".

Just reading those perfectly worded texts, free of colloquial speech, I am happy to learn (because they said it perfectly)-

  • 22-year-olds still use phrases like "my old man", "squad car", "swept the area"
  • Tyler was keenly aware that "some crazy old guy [George Zinn] was arrested and some other guy too", but they had nothing to do with it
  • Tyler had to tell his partner (the transgender furry 'roommate') explicitly that his dad was "very MAGA"... because, you know, I will bet that the roomie didn't know that family dynamic and Tyler had to state it explicitly
  • The lover/furry/roomie was apparently completely unaware of this action and had to be told it was in fact Tyler. Both dudes were on the same discord, there are more than 20 people that may have advanced knowledge, and "my love" was the last to find out.
  • This brilliant 22-year-old with no social footprint was just dumb enough to carry his phone the entire time, text real-time updates and make calls, and have a text conversation that eliminates the possibility of support groups, any other suspects, or any support from another agency. Well, guess we should stop asking questions then, said it clearly.
  • The smart 22-year-old used plain language to describe in excruciating detail his crime, as opposed to, you know, laying low and getting home and telling his partner in person.
  • And after all this is done, this insanely precise text conversation, the killer decides to confess to his dad and pastor and turn himself in, because we all know if you both delete the text conversation, the FBI can't possibly get it.

Don't get me started on the FBI, the clearing of the crime scene, the autopsy, the bullet path that can't be the bullet path, all of it.

@AWP I don't care what subgroup of folks came up with it, this is the black pill for me, because all of it, because of every single piece of this story.
Click to expand...

Yeah. It is pretty unbelievable.
 
When it comes to people like Kimmel, Obama, Sanders, Clintons, and the rest of the radical leftists in our society, I can't help but think back to the 1990's when I first began to pay attention to polyticks. I was often told that I was just being silly.

Now, I just don't have enough "I told you so's" for all the fucking turds that used to tell me I had just been brainwashed by Rush Limbaugh.

I.TOLD.THEM.SO.

Not even Barak Hussein Obama can lament the murder of an innocent American that was speaking truth to power without feeling the need to caveat his hate.

Just like Martin Luther King Jr - Charlie Kirk was not killed for what he was saying.
These men were killed because people were listening.


People on the left only want to "start the conversation" when they are politically empowered to control the topic and the narrative.
 
even Kimmels initial post was a 'non shout out' of sorts...

"Instead of the Angry Finger Pointing"
...THAT dude, the one right there, that I am angrily pointing my finger at - just did a horrible act.

"Can we just for one day, agree"
...and I'll be right back to my usual spiteful character attacks as soon as this has blown over

"to all of the victims of senseless gun violence"
...because I don't want to acknowledge that Charlie Kirk was a good man murdered in cold blood. I need to quantify that this is just about gun violence and simply don't have the moral capacity to refrain from getting in a political dig


Fuck you Kimmel




ps:
I never
ever
ever ever ever
...want to agree with you on anything- not even for a day - because fuck you Kimmel - fuck you and all those that drink your kool-aid
 
Last edited:
TLDR20 said:
Yeah. It is pretty unbelievable.
Click to expand...
I will accept several explanations here, but there are none.

I will accept-

- It was a paraphrasing of the conversation because normal people can't read Gen Z speak (the multiple ellipses lead me to believe that stuff was snipped or no?)
- They edited the conversation only to include details and conversations specifically related to the crime (legal standard)

I will not accept-

- That this is a normal, organic conversation between two mentally ill 20-year-olds taking place in a high-stress scenario

That's the short of it.
 
Let me see if I am following this Jimmy Kimmel narrative correctly.

Blackface Jimmy celebrated the firing of Tucker from Fox for the exact same thing that Jimmy did- Jimmy exposed Nexstar and the subordinate company (ABC) to outsize risk (libel, defamation, lawsuits, retractions) by politicizing the hottest issue we have seen in our adult lives. Nextstar and ABC learned from Tucker and Fox- you fire the talent before you catch the charge. The FCC (hilarious that for the first time in history ever, you can call the FCC "party aligned") sent a shot across the bow of Nexstar, Nexstar didn't want the smoke, fired the talent.

Then the left, who just shot a guy for the crime of free speech, desperately tries to turn this into a free speech issue by continuing the same rhetoric that led to the shooting with the same language. "Cancelling Jimmy Kimmel is a move towards authoritarianism, and guess who is driving it- DONALD TRUMP. This is a ThReAt To DeMoCrAcY."

So a racist, millionaire ass clown whose viewership is 1/5th what it was 5 years ago couldn't read the room and got fired by a private company that wants profit because he couldn't be a decent human for two seconds. That's literally all he had to do. You don't need to mourn, you dont need to cry (although Jimmy did cry about school shootings and gun violence before... ironic), you don't even need to make a statement.

I do not care. Maybe Jimmy can #learntocode.
 
Last edited:
Great deep dive into the numbers for the "both sides" folks. FTR, if you're a "political violence happens on both sides" type and ignore the scope and scale of the violence, I think you're a fucking retard. If you internalized that, don't bother responding, I don't have conversations with fucking retards.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968503082322383122
 
I could be convinced that it WAS done by two mentally ill 20-year-olds but only under one condition:
- It was a "FRAGO" off the original plan to try and deliberately try and "clean" one party from guilt now that the gig was up.

"Hey man - I know you totally didn't have anything to do with this but - some things happened"
"What? No way?"
"Yes way!"
"Get right outta here!"
"NO really - I did some things that you totally didn't know about!"
"Wow, I had no idea you were planning those things that you did."
"I know bro, I did it without any help or input from you whatsoever!"
"Doot Doot - 6,7 bro!"
"For real. The glowies on on me brah, I gotta bail"
"Cool. Bella Ciao bro. Bella Ciao"

Anything else just defies explanation inside of my diminutive capacity for logic and reason.
 
Box said:
I could be convinced that it WAS done by two mentally ill 20-year-olds but only under one condition:
- It was a "FRAGO" off the original plan to try and deliberately try and "clean" one party from guilt now that the gig was up.

"Hey man - I know you totally didn't have anything to do with this but - some things happened"
"What? No way?"
"Yes way!"
"Get right outta here!"
"NO really - I did some things that you totally didn't know about!"
"Wow, I had no idea you were planning those things that you did."
"I know bro, I did it without any help or input from you whatsoever!"
"Doot Doot - 6,7 bro!"
"For real. The glowies on on me brah, I gotta bail"
"Cool. Bella Ciao bro. Bella Ciao"

Anything else just defies explanation inside of my diminutive capacity for logic and reason.
Click to expand...
I mean, that's the going theory. If we believe the texts are true, unedited, and sent by the killer to the boyfriend, the chain does the following- absolves the roommate. If he didn't know it was happening, he can't be complicit. It id's Robinson as the sole shooter, with the weapon, and the motive. It absolves Goerge Zinn for whatever role (opportunistic or not) he played. It's literally an orgy of evidence. It's as if a prosecuter thought, "If I was gonna get a conviction as fast as possible to get this out of the public space ASAP, what kind of script would I write? What would I need someone to say to remove all doubt?"

One *very logical reason that should cause everyone to be a skeptic*- we have the technology right this second where a scammer can use AI, craft a script with your voice, call your spouse from your phone number, and hold a conversation where (maybe) your wife might be able to know it's not you- but someone else would have no clue.

You think someone can't spoof a text message string? One that both the killer and the boyfriend deleted off their phones? I am not making a claim; I am asking the question.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

A
E/V Nautilus WWII Discoveries
Replies
4
Views
584
AWP
A
G
Hey
Replies
2
Views
883
Kaldak
Kaldak
Marauder06
Don't Automatically Assume the Worst About People
Replies
14
Views
3K
Diamondback 2/2
Diamondback 2/2
Muppet
Loss
Replies
13
Views
1K
Dame
Dame
Marauder06
shooting headsets with 2-way capability
Replies
12
Views
2K
ArtaPlageSurfer
ArtaPlageSurfer
Back
Top