Just finished it. Echoing
@Archangel27 , " it doesn't tell us a lot we don't know, but the little hidden nuggets that were kept out of the public eye until now were very illuminating." It's taken me a couple days to digest and ruminate on it.
The author's lack of experience with all things military shows a knowledge deficit (example, McRaven used 6 for the UBL raid because he had been a SEAL; no, it was because the other SMU was assigned to Iraq, and 6 was at the time assigned to AStan; etc.). Because of this he tends to draw conclusions that frame his narrative, not necessarily conclusions that were accurate.
That said, it's clear he had help from the inside. Some of the things he wrote about were either lies and making it up, or based on inside gossip. He doesn't strike me as the liar given the material, so I believe it's because he had help from the inside.
The events regarding Gallagher, Slabinski/Chapman were pretty egregious. How Gallagher came ot of this smelling like a rose does not speak well to the legal system; not to mention, how politicized the whole event became. The Melgar thing? That made me sick to my stomach.
Regarding Bissenette and O'Neil, I'll be honest, I read
No East Day, I thought it was OK. But I think both are turds. I hate that NSW has become a cultural brand with books and movies, but when it comes to reading and watching,
mea culpa. But I am not a SEAL groupie; I read and watch all sorts of military history.
I have mentioned I know/knew some SEALs. Almost everyone I know is out now. We were peers, and we're all old. Of the handful I know well, this narrative does not fit them, but for a couple it absolutely does.