Haney's book was written out of the family and was not vetted if I recall. He was PNG'd right quickly. Greer's book, the unit didn't have any issue with, and it got hot hung up in vetting and he published it anyway. I'm working off no caffeine and memory so I might be a little fuzzy. A couple of the guys said that his book was factually correct regarding their roles in the events Greer described.
So far it seems like when a Delta guy writes a book, he doesn't lie, he doesn't throw anyone under the bus, and there appears to be some level of integrity.
Lone Survivor, Killing Bin Laden, almost any book about Takur Ghar, not only have they been factually incorrect, and refuted, But it seems that that community just kind of shrugs it off. When a book is written to counter the narrative in those books, they circle the wagons.
Anyhoo, just my perspective.