I read the book, thought it was okay, and am curious about SAWMAN's comments in the link above. Not that I have a dog in the fight, my intellectual side likes (within reason) to know why something is wrong or jacked up. Of course, sometimes one's desire to know is trumped by the fact that I don't need to know, so there's always that.
But as to the book, without knowing everything or how true it is or isn't, on the surface it seems like a great story but there are some serious gaps in it (not unlike Haney's book which should cause one to pause). I did find his willingness to take some jabs at other units to be a bit "less than professional" especially after he went to pains in the book to point out that he was the anti-Marcinko. Including the bit about his divorce and his wife....that was just awkward to read. It was like he wanted to throw a job in but also appear to take the high road...have his cake and eat it too, so you start to wonder how much he's omitting and/ or soft pedals on a topic to sell it to the reader.
Honestly, if you want to read it I'd go to a local used bookstore and find a discounted paperback copy or go out and torrent it if that's your thing.