kraut783 what's it because of the tactics or what is your reasoning?
The book had a number of lies so it follows the movie isn't going to be great. Things like no cover on his scope to prevent reflection, the character of "Mustafa" was made up, the bounty on his head didn't exist...
War movies have been trash since the dawn of time. We somehow expect modern movies made under the GWOT's hyperpatriotism to be any different?
Yeah, nah.
Anyway, I recommend cracking open a search engine and doing some digging. Pick a book or movie, American Sniper, Lone Survivor (and the criticism of that is nuclear), Band of Brothers, The Pacific, etc. and in about 10 minutes you can shatter a lot of notions about the film/ series accuracy. I'd argue the best thing out right now is Masters of the Air and it has problems.
Blackhawk Down is another where the book has issues as does the movie. That one at least is understandable.
Something else to consider is the movie making process itself. One page of a script is roughly one minute of screen time. Now you're truncating events, dropping them, oversimplifying details, dropping people, combining people into a composite character... all problems with BHD, but problems that are understandable.
One of the most accurate scenes I've witnessed is buried in a horrible movie, Hurt Locker. The scene where he goes out for cereal, but stands in a brightly lit, fully stocked aisle of cereal and is overwhelmed with choices and paralyzed to make a decision? That's a thing. I felt that one as a contractor fobbit so I can only imagine that happening to dudes who just spent 12-15 months in Iraq.