.
Last edited:
...There are a hell of a lot of good apples too...
I’ll just say one more thing. I know a lot of guys at every team. Including Team 7. I went through training with them. I bled with them, got drunk with them, even cried at moments with them. There are bad apples that I don’t get along with. There are a hell of a lot of good apples too.
Yes that’s very trueSEALs weren’t the only ones who were pardoned by Trump recently. SEALs aren’t the only ones making news headlines.
Not saying SEALs haven’t done anything wrong. They are far from the only one’s getting caught up in trouble though.
As a regular Joe It’s my opinion that in a way we civilians are too blame as well. We regard you men in SOF community as Greek heroes come to life and our movies and video games encourage our perspective. We eagerly consume any and all books written by SOF and none have been given more press than the SEALS who to many are freaking Achilles and can do no wrong. Hell till I joined this forum I had no idea that the SEALS were even conducting themselves badly which shows how ignorant our perspective is on the culture you have
I don't want choir boys...
This is the key here. Every organization has bad apples. Conventional units, in my experience anyway, are built in a way that enables them to quickly identify and remove personnel who demonstrate character failures. A lot of good people will fall into this trap, however, as the infantry battalions often cut away a lot of good tissue to remove cancers. SOF units, on the other hand, tend to operate in distributed and fairly independent sub-units. This makes it much easier to mask bad behavior because the team serves as a strong net to protect the individual. There comes a time, however, when SOF have to decide when protecting a teammate is damaging the institution. Some units do this better than others. At what point do you stop covering for the SEALs and Raiders who murdered SSgt Melgar? Do you address this problem when they are violating General Order #1? How about when you catch them stealing operational funds? How about when they tell you that they are going to haze someone? I think that everyone here would agree to stop them from killing their teammate but it's important to understand that murder wasn't the first step they took on their path to criminal activity. This almost certainly could have been prevented through intervention at any other step down the character ladder. This is the core of this conversation we are having about unit culture. Turning a blind eye to drug pops and condoning unauthorized behavior creates an environment where the rules don't matter. That's unacceptable in any military unit, special or otherwise.Bad apples happen and should be expected. Leadership's response will define the community, whether they cut out the rot or allow it to remain on the tree.
Sure are alot of people on the outside on this thread commenting about a culture of a team they have never been a part of.
I also wonder if the drive to ramp-up special operations numbers after 9/11 occasionally allowed questionable individuals to slip through the vetting/training pipeline? (DeDolph et al).
Honestly we could probably say the same thing about all SOF at this point. It made sense to grow SOCOM during the GWOT but it might be time to right size the force. Cut unnecessary missions back, shrink headquarters, and re-evaluate entry level standards. It seems like they may have slipped in some cases to help meet rising demand for SOF over the past 20 years.
You'd be surprised how much you can learn about the culture and about SOF through open-source research, inside sources, contacts and friends in the community--something I did professionally for 26 years.
Most importantly, certain members of the teams over the past 30 years have shamelessly exposed many aspects of their culture through action, word and deed. Much of their culture has been splashed all over the headlines.
That in my opinion makes them fair game for anybody, especially military people with special operations or significant combat experience or people who have studied and reported on the military all their lives, as I have.
I get what you're saying, Brother, but we're way beyond exercising discretion on a subject that's no longer discreet.
Man, I get what you're saying but I don't need to be personally acquainted with Bill Cosby to know I shouldn't let him pour drinks for my daughters.I disagree. Just because you can read open source info about every aspect of Ranger School does not mean you know what really goes on there.
I disagree. Just because you can read open source info about every aspect of Ranger School does not mean you know what really goes on there.
Nor do I.
I want a SF commander like @Viper1 ; I want a Raider commander like @Teufel ; I want a G2 like @Marauder06 ; but make no mistake, I want to work with @Box cuz I want to chuckle when shit doesn’t make sense.
SOF is full of all of the above but their collective successes don’t “sell”.
Serious question: If members of a certain unit commit war crimes and crimes in general is that not a reflection of the culture of that unit?That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is unless you are in that team room how do you know what's really going on?
No.Serious question: If members of a certain unit commit war crimes and crimes in general is that not a reflection of the culture of that unit?