My google box works good - over a year in and
Everyone Robert Mueller Charged in Russia Investigation Against President Trump's Campaign Team stands accused of crimes that were taking place years before the election except for the actual Russian gangsters.
Otherwise, it looks a lot like crimes that seem like they would be pretty common of any international business person if they were looked at by a special counsel. I'm sure if the scope was sincere, the Clinton Foundation and associated syndicate would have also been targeted by the special counsel since he is looking for ALL of the truth and not just some random hook to snare the POTUS....
-Manafort: personal finance prior to 2014 - nothing to do with Russia stealing an election
-Gates: personal finance prior to - nothing to do with Russia stealing an election
-Papadopoulos: one count of false statement
-Flynn: one count of false statement
-Van Der Zwaan: one count of false statement
-13 Russians: charged with fraud resulting in 13 advertisements critical of the Clinton syndicate
-Pinedo: identity fraud dating back to 2014- a criminal act that should be prosecuted in a criminal court - but still not related to Russians help POTUS steal the election
What I see is a hack job brought on by a 'trumped' up charge after the head of FBI admittedly leaked information that he admittedly leaked with hopes that it would instigate the establishment of a special counsel
...the view from my foxhole is a politically motivated hack job that looks like it is geared towards delegitimizing the administration until enough people can be charged with making a "false statement" that they are able to charge the POTUS with obstruction of justice or perjury.
I am fully aware that my viewpoint is slanted towards my side of the aisle and that the tinfoil lining in my hat prevents me from being fair to certain parcels of news - but that doesn't mean I don't peruse multiple venues before forming my politically slanted opinions. I also recognize full that George Stephanopoulos and Sean Hannity could both read the same list of facts prior to going on the air and yet their reporting on said facts would sound remarkably different based solely who they are talking about.
The current POTUS is no more or less morally superior to any other resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue over the last 200 years so the hype is relative. The same folks that think Stormy Daniels should get more air time are the same folks that think what happened with Monica Lewinsky was a personal matter between Bill and Hillary. The same folks that think Hillary should be drawn and quartered over money from the Clinton Foundation will just as quickly try to justify Manafort's shady finances as the cost of running an international business.
Nobody is innocent here - not the left, not the right - the only victims are the American people that got stuck with a general election cycle worthy of a complete season worth of South Park episodes.
Opinions may vary
