After yesterday I put Lando in with the likes of Hamilton, Colapinto, and Stroll though to be fair two have talent and two do not.
If you watch Lando's in car views the incident (inchident) looks like good, hard racing. If you watch LeClerc's in car view Lando looks bad. If you watch the overhead, Lando looks like ass. You can see him brake late and move to gain position on Piastri. Good move. The problem I see is Lando forgets Verstappen is there, Lando's so focused on beating Piastri to the apex he ignores or forgets there are other cars on the track. You can see this in the way he taps Verstappen's rear and then jerks the wheel to the right. Piastri avoids a wreck through lightning reflexes and just a little bit of room to the wall; indeed, Piastri nearly hit the wall as a result.
I'm not the only one:
Lando Norris-Oscar Piastri Singapore GP collision has changed ground rules in F1 title battle, says Martin Brundle
If you go back to Canada Lando did the same thing but on a straight: he focused on a gap that didn't exist and crashed his car. Lando has a track record of tunnel vision when passing other cars. Whereas in Canada Lando took responsibility, yesterday in Singapore he treated it as hard racing.
Where it gets infuriating is the team supports Lando's assertion nothing was wrong with the move, but 1 meter is a mile in this case because a meter's different in braking causes a massive, massive crash.
Minus qualifying, Lando is a good driver with a clear track. Put him in traffic and every pass is a roll of the dice.
Piastri has to stop being a little bitch. I'm all in on the lad, but his attitude over the last two races is dogshit. That said, his manager is Mark "Multi 21" Webber and after yesterday I think Papaya Rules is all but dead, now Multi 81 is the order of the day.
As an aside, I think if you watched it on F1TV you saw a case of the announcers being gagged by production and forced to take Lando's side. That was disgusting.