The Trump Presidency 2.0

I've looked up the Q/A after the fact a number of times, but that's because I prefer that to live broadcasts.

I wasn't the person who turned it on in the office. One of our T5 staff is very excited for Hesgeth and wanted to listen to it.
Roger. I think it's smart to listen in, hear it straight instead of having it filtered and framed by the press, most of whom want to portray anyone associated with a Republican administration in the worst possible light.

I don't recall Sec Austin doing any live town halls, but it's entirely possible that I simple missed them.
 
Roger. I think it's smart to listen in, hear it straight instead of having it filtered and framed by the press, most of whom want to portray anyone associated with a Republican administration in the worst possible light.

I don't recall Sec Austin doing any live town halls, but it's entirely possible that I simple missed them.

To be fair, he probably held them without telling anyone.
 
Scholarships will often give extra points to applicants from states or areas that aren’t usually represented at their program. Like, you expect a ton of applicants to come from California, New York, and Texas not only because of their large population base but because of the large amount of academic resources available. But when you see a kickass candidate from West Virginia, which doesn't invest as many dollars per capita into education, the belief is that those candidates have to work much harder to achieve the same level of success than students from wealthier states. And that’s a proxy for the level of passion and dedication the student has for the subject.

I’ve been on the selection panel for a scholarship for several years and you see this pretty often. All the candidates have excellent scores and generally write good statements of purpose. But the ones who manage to do that without a bunch of built-in advantages will benefit the most from the scholarship.
 
Scholarships will often give extra points to applicants from states or areas that aren’t usually represented at their program. Like, you expect a ton of applicants to come from California, New York, and Texas not only because of their large population base but because of the large amount of academic resources available. But when you see a kickass candidate from West Virginia, which doesn't invest as many dollars per capita into education, the belief is that those candidates have to work much harder to achieve the same level of success than students from wealthier states. And that’s a proxy for the level of passion and dedication the student has for the subject.

I’ve been on the selection panel for a scholarship for several years and you see this pretty often. All the candidates have excellent scores and generally write good statements of purpose. But the ones who manage to do that without a bunch of built-in advantages will benefit the most from the scholarship.
And this makes sense. Thank you for the explanation. You see why it sounds crazy, though, to someone who doesn't know what you just typed?
 
And this makes sense. Thank you for the explanation. You see why it sounds crazy, though, to someone who doesn't know what you just typed?
Regional representation is common practice and... not racist. Giving people special treatment based on race, and/or denying people opportunities based on their race, is racism.
 
I voted for a CEO that had no off switch...why this chick was even granted this platform shows you everything that is wrong with late night stuff.

7 days a week?

Military veterans with multiple deployments:

No Problem Snl GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
Scholarships will often give extra points to applicants from states or areas that aren’t usually represented at their program. Like, you expect a ton of applicants to come from California, New York, and Texas not only because of their large population base but because of the large amount of academic resources available. But when you see a kickass candidate from West Virginia, which doesn't invest as many dollars per capita into education, the belief is that those candidates have to work much harder to achieve the same level of success than students from wealthier states. And that’s a proxy for the level of passion and dedication the student has for the subject.

I’ve been on the selection panel for a scholarship for several years and you see this pretty often. All the candidates have excellent scores and generally write good statements of purpose. But the ones who manage to do that without a bunch of built-in advantages will benefit the most from the scholarship.

I have seen a bit of a counter argument to this, and although the 'n' is pretty small comparatively, not sure what (if anything) could/should be done.

Kid from rural state/county has that 4.0 and checks the boxes, but the quality and rigor of their education was less than a peer coming from a certain city or certain county.

Again, I don't think this is a big problem, and I am all for advantages for lesser-represented kids to have a seat at the grown-up table if they have earned it.
 
Trump Enrages Christian MAGA By Naming ‘Heretic’ Pastor to White House

I never thought Trump was a “Christian” but it is funny to see people who thought he was like them be utterly dumbfounded by his insane choices. I don’t care about a faith office other than I think it is a stupid nonsense role. I look forward to DOGE cutting that entire office(because that would be efficient right?)

They not like us.
 
I mean, sure, whatever. Are they going to try and find similar soldiers stories to change back the other posts, or is it just Bragg?

This is what the Army gets for going with Liberty instead of Fort Beckwith I guess.

Or Shughart-Gordon, or Miller, or 25 other MOH winners with Airborne SOF lineage. This was a major fumble by the Army and the naming convention. That Benavidez didn’t get a base is a crime. Liberty was a failure in every way. I’m on record saying that Bragg was a shitty loser general, but they fucked this up.
 
Back
Top