Sorry man. I’m out of practiceI'll give you 1/3.
Sorry man. I’m out of practiceI'll give you 1/3.
I don't understand the statement. Is this satire?Pete Hegseth is a DEI hire #changemymind
Pete Hegseth is a DEI hire #changemymind
I mean, I read that Daily Kos article too and I hope there's more to "Hegseth is a DEI hire" than that tripe.
I learned from this article that he also attended the Kennedy School of Government and received a Masters in Public Policy. Are we not told that the Kennedy School of Government is a prestigious college within Harvard?I mean, I read that Daily Kos article too and I hope there's more to "Hegseth is a DEI hire" than that tripe.
I mean I guess Harvard is OK if that's all you can get into ;)I learned from this article that he also attended the Kennedy School of Government and received a Masters in Public Policy. Are we not told that the Kennedy School of Government is a prestigious college within Harvard?
The article also didn't talk about his time on Wall Street which was the entire time he was the CEO of the two veterans advocacy groups. But point is I learned something from the article haha.
And a graduate of two Ivy Leagues, even, the first being Princeton (EDIT: oops, looks like @Marauder06 already touched on this point a minute or two before this post! ).I learned from this article that he also attended the Kennedy School of Government and received a Masters in Public Policy. Are we not told that the Kennedy School of Government is a prestigious college within Harvard?
The article also didn't talk about his time on Wall Street which was the entire time he was the CEO of the two veterans advocacy groups. But point is I learned something from the article haha.
Pete Hegseth is a DEI hire #changemymind
It's also in our interests to severely limit the F-1s that are approved for those schools (especially MIT and Cal Tech).I mean I guess Harvard is OK if that's all you can get into ;)
Yeah, a Princeton-Harvard academic convo is pretty solid. Both of those programs are prestigious and competitive. This goes back to a point I've made several times that most of the people who make the major decisions for our country go to a handful of schools--mainly (but not exclusively) the Ivies and the Academies (or both) and it's in our interests to invest time and effort into the young people at those schools to make sure that the military isn't just an abstraction for them.
The only thing that seems to stick out is his "alcohol abuse" and the had two divorces. But I literally had never heard of this guy until after Trump was elected the second time, maybe I'm memory holing stuff because supposedly he thought about nominating him for SECDEF then SECVA the last time? If public drunkenness is a problem, like we literally have events in the Army where binge drinking it encouraged. And also corporate America and in banking? Alcohol is on the low end of substance abuse items.And a graduate of two Ivy Leagues, even, the first being Princeton (EDIT: oops, looks like @Marauder06 already touched on this point a minute or two before this post! ).
Agreed that his spread doesn't match the typical background for this position, but his personal past conduct seems to be the biggest of the red flags, just going off the basic reading I've only now done on him.
I mean I guess Harvard is OK if that's all you can get into ;)
Yeah, a Princeton-Harvard academic convo is pretty solid. Both of those programs are prestigious and competitive. This goes back to a point I've made several times that most of the people who make the major decisions for our country go to a handful of schools--mainly (but not exclusively) the Ivies and the Academies (or both) and it's in our interests to invest time and effort into the young people at those schools to make sure that the military isn't just an abstraction for them.
Oh, then you definitely missed some things man, especially if you're putting alcohol abuse in quotes as if he didn't pass a basic threshold for it - much less the bar (hehe) for someone appointed to make potentially catastrophic life-or-death decisions using the world's most powerful military in history. After reading what I found below, I can see more of why several of his own Republican colleagues even had some reservations about his appointment to SecDef.The only thing that seems to stick out is his "alcohol abuse" and the had two divorces.
So yes, I think on paper his educational and military pedigrees don't look bad, but I think it's reasonable for anyone to be leery of appointing someone who would've have been disqualified on personal conduct and alcohol abuse alone from accessing or working in a good percentage of the national security activities he'll now be in charge of overseeing and directing.From Wikipedia:
In a whistleblower report, former CVA employees said Pete Hegseth was frequently heavily intoxicated during official events to the point of having to be restrained, passing out, and shouting slogans calling for the death of all Muslims. The report also said that he sexually pursued female employees and under his leadership the organization ignored allegations of sexual impropriety, including allegations of sexual assault. According to reporting by The New Yorker, mismanagement and alcoholism concerns led to Hegseth's forced resignation from CVA in January 2016.
Oh, then you definitely missed some things man, especially if you're putting alcohol abuse in quotes as if he didn't pass a basic threshold for it - much less the bar (hehe) for someone appointed to make potentially catastrophic life-or-death decisions using the world's most powerful military in history. After reading what I found below, I can see more of why several of his own Republican colleagues even had some reservations about his appointment to SecDef.
Apparently, he was pushed out from both of the veterans advocacy groups he ran. The first, Veterans for Freedom, for mismanaging funds and losing the trust of donors (apparently while managing less than ten employees), and the other, Concerned Veterans for America, for routinely showing up to official events trashed to the point of passing out, being literally carried out of venues, and even calling for the deaths of entire religious groups.
So yes, I think on paper his educational and military pedigrees don't look bad, but I think it's reasonable for anyone to be leery of appointing someone who would've have been disqualified on personal conduct and alcohol abuse alone from accessing or working in a good percentage of the national security activities he'll now be in charge of overseeing and directing.
Are you saying that it’s generally accepted that an Army Infantry Officer should go through Ranger school in a certain timeframe and that he either didn’t go, or could not pass the school?the lack of a tab is what is concerning to me,
Are you saying that it’s generally accepted that an Army Infantry Officer should go through Ranger school in a certain timeframe and that he either didn’t go, or could not pass the school?
Are you saying that it’s generally accepted that an Army Infantry Officer should go through Ranger school in a certain timeframe and that he either didn’t go, or could not pass the school?