The Trump Presidency 2.0

I heard on a podcast today that something like only 6% of federal workers are in the office fulltime.

Fulltime is only 40 hours a week.

That percentage sounds low to me and I haven't fact-checked it yet. But if it's anything close to that, then yeah, we need to
The 6% number is based on a "self-reported survey" of ~6k people who get on Fed News Network.

OMB had 54% full time in office.

From the article:
The I-Team traced the 6% number to a report Sen. Joni Ernst, Department of Government Efficiency caucus leader, published last month called “Out of Office.” Tucked in the footnotes, the I-Team found she got the figure from a “non-scientific” survey of workers done last spring by Federal News Network.

According to the outlet, it received about 6,300 responses from people who “self-reported information to verify their status as current federal employees.” Of those respondents, 6% said they work “entirely in-person,” while 64% said they worked a hybrid schedule.

Exact data on how many federal employees go to the office is hard to find.

A study last year from the Office of Management and Budget, however, reports that of the 2.28 million civilians working for the federal government, 54% work fully on site.

Of those who had permission to telework, they spent about 61% of their time in the office.
 

These bought and paid for shills in the military media complex really need to go away. Does he not understand how shitty the Army was under the DEI hires of Fanning and Wormuth? Like the morale change from McHugh to Fanning was overnight bad.

I heard on a podcast today that something like only 6% of federal workers are in the office fulltime.

Fulltime is only 40 hours a week.

That percentage sounds low to me and I haven't fact-checked it yet. But if it's anything close to that, then yeah, we need to make some big changes.

Well COVID changed everything for a lot of companies. The fact that the .gov didn't do what Silicon Valley did which was reduce pay to geographic areas of relocation for people who wouldn't return to SF, SV, or NY is wild. But Federal Agencies have unions and no leadership.

That's a nice salary you have there, would be rough is something happened to it.
 
Well COVID changed everything for a lot of companies. The fact that the .gov didn't do what Silicon Valley did which was reduce pay to geographic areas of relocation for people who wouldn't return to SF, SV, or NY is wild. But Federal Agencies have unions and no leadership.

Locality pay is based on the city where your home/remote worksite is. I'd say 99% of people being paid otherwise are commiting fraud.

That 1% of remote workers are people that work for something like the State Department and have special authorizations for their payband.
 
I guess I work around the wrong crowd because they aren't what you describe. As always, you're smarter and have all of the answers.

Nah, I'm just a dude getting stiffed by the price of eggs. ;-)

The yolks must flow.
Locality pay is based on the city where your home/remote worksite is. I'd say 99% of people being paid otherwise are commiting fraud.

That 1% of remote workers are people that work for something like the State Department and have special authorizations for their payband.
Call me provincial, but how much fraud is committed by Federal Workers at any time?

How much fraud is committed by the Federal Govt at any time? In between sponsoring drag shows in Peru and shipping condoms to Gaza. :ROFLMAO:
(removed meme and put in dot thread)
 
Last edited:
Figured I'd post this. It's the memorandum. From my brief look through, it seems pretty generous.

https://www.opm.gov/media/cbklseim/opm-guidance-memo-re-deferred-resignation-program-1-28-2025.pdf

Original Guidance:
Fork in the Road

Fork in the Road
Frequently Asked Questions

Below is the email that was sent to federal employees on January 28, 2025 presenting a deferred resignation offer. If you did not respond to that email and wish to accept the deferred resignation offer, you may do so by following these steps.

1) Send an email to hr@opm.gov from your government account. Only an email from your .gov or .mil account will be accepted.
2) Type the word "Resign" into the "Subject" line of the email. Hit "Send".
Deferred Resignation Email to Federal Employees
January 28, 2025

During the first week of his administration, President Trump issued a number of directives concerning the federal workforce. Among those directives, the President required that employees return to in-person work, restored accountability for employees who have policy-making authority, restored accountability for senior career executives, and reformed the federal hiring process to focus on merit. As a result of the above orders, the reform of the federal workforce will be significant.

The reformed federal workforce will be built around four pillars:

1) Return to Office: The substantial majority of federal employees who have been working remotely since Covid will be required to return to their physical offices five days a week. Going forward, we also expect our physical offices to undergo meaningful consolidation and divestitures, potentially resulting in physical office relocations for a number of federal workers.

2) Performance culture: The federal workforce should be comprised of the best America has to offer. We will insist on excellence at every level — our performance standards will be updated to reward and promote those that exceed expectations and address in a fair and open way those who do not meet the high standards which the taxpayers of this country have a right to demand.

3) More streamlined and flexible workforce: While a few agencies and even branches of the military are likely to see increases in the size of their workforce, the majority of federal agencies are likely to be downsized through restructurings, realignments, and reductions in force. These actions are likely to include the use of furloughs and the reclassification to at-will status for a substantial number of federal employees.

4) Enhanced standards of conduct: The federal workforce should be comprised of employees who are reliable, loyal, trustworthy, and who strive for excellence in their daily work. Employees will be subject to enhanced standards of suitability and conduct as we move forward. Employees who engage in unlawful behavior or other misconduct will be prioritized for appropriate investigation and discipline, including termination.

Each of the pillars outlined above will be pursued in accordance with applicable law, consistent with your agency's policies, and to the extent permitted under relevant collective-bargaining agreements.

If you choose to remain in your current position, we thank you for your renewed focus on serving the American people to the best of your abilities and look forward to working together as part of an improved federal workforce. At this time, we cannot give you full assurance regarding the certainty of your position or agency but should your position be eliminated you will be treated with dignity and will be afforded the protections in place for such positions.

If you choose not to continue in your current role in the federal workforce, we thank you for your service to your country and you will be provided with a dignified, fair departure from the federal government utilizing a deferred resignation program. This program begins effective January 28 and is available to all federal employees until February 6. If you resign under this program, you will retain all pay and benefits regardless of your daily workload and will be exempted from all applicable in-person work requirements until September 30, 2025 (or earlier if you choose to accelerate your resignation for any reason). The details of this separation plan can be found below.

Whichever path you choose, we thank you for your service to The United States of America.


*********************************************************************


Upon review of the below deferred resignation letter, if you wish to resign:


1) Select “Reply” to this email. You must reply from your government account. A reply from an account other than your .gov or .mil account will not be accepted.
2) Type the word “Resign” into the body of this reply email. Hit “Send”.


THE LAST DAY TO ACCEPT THE DEFERRED RESIGNATION PROGRAM IS FEBRUARY 6, 2025.

Deferred resignation is available to all full-time federal employees except for military personnel of the armed forces, employees of the U.S. Postal Service, those in positions related to immigration enforcement and national security, and those in any other positions specifically excluded by your employing agency.


*************************************************************

DEFERRED RESIGNATION LETTER

January 28, 2025

Please accept this letter as my formal resignation from employment with my employing agency, effective September 30, 2025. I understand that I have the right to accelerate, but not extend, my resignation date if I wish to take advantage of the deferred resignation program. I also understand that if I am (or become) eligible for early or normal retirement before my resignation date, that I retain the right to elect early or normal retirement (once eligible) at any point prior to my resignation date.

Given my impending resignation, I understand I will be exempt from any “Return to Office” requirements pursuant to recent directives and that I will maintain my current compensation and retain all existing benefits (including but not limited to retirement accruals) until my final resignation date.

I am certain of my decision to resign and my choice to resign is fully voluntary. I understand my employing agency will likely make adjustments in response to my resignation including moving, eliminating, consolidating, reassigning my position and tasks, reducing my official duties, and/or placing me on paid administrative leave until my resignation date.

I am committed to ensuring a smooth transition during my remaining time at my employing agency. Accordingly, I will assist my employing agency with completing reasonable and customary tasks and processes to facilitate my departure.

I understand that my acceptance of this offer will be sent to the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) which will then share it with my agency employer. I hereby consent to OPM receiving, reviewing, and forwarding my acceptance.

Upon submission of your resignation, you will receive a confirmation email acknowledging receipt of your email. Any replies to this email shall be for the exclusive use of accepting the deferred resignation letter. Any other replies to this email will not be reviewed, forwarded, or retained other than as required by applicable federal records laws.

Once your resignation is validly sent and received, the human resources department of your employing agency will contact you to complete additional documentation, if any.

OPM is authorized to send this email under Executive Order 9830 and 5 U.S.C. §§ 301, 1103, 1104, 2951, 3301, 6504, 8347, and 8461. OPM intends to use your response to assist in federal workforce reorganization efforts in conjunction with employing agencies. See 88 Fed. Reg. 56058; 80 Fed. Reg. 72455 (listing routine uses). Response to this email is voluntary. Although you must respond to take advantage of the deferred resignation offer, there is no penalty for nonresponse.
 
Last edited:
6% struck me as too low. But 6,000 isn't a bad sample size for a survey.

54% fulltime still means almost half of them aren't...

I'd want to know what percentage was 100% remote. Of people teleworking, they spent ~60% in the office, which is similar to what @AWP works.

I do 75%, but I'm also on 4/10s so my math is easier.

Ultimately, I don't think telework/remote work is an issue; weak managers and the inability to hold people accountable for missed deadlines are.
 
I guess I work around the wrong crowd because they aren't what you describe. As always, you're smarter and have all of the answers.
I was a Dept of the Navy GS prior to 911. Half of the building was filled with Liberals.
I loved reminding them that our purpose was to make it easier for the Navy to kill people.
 
I heard on a podcast today that something like only 6% of federal workers are in the office fulltime.

Fulltime is only 40 hours a week.

That percentage sounds low to me and I haven't fact-checked it yet. But if it's anything close to that, then yeah, we need to make some big changes.
I’m curious as to the exact wording of the question.

In an average week, I’m in the office 100% of the time. There are some non-average weeks and if you were to ask me what percentage of my hours last year were in the office it would not be 100%.
 
My telework agreement gives me 8 hours per pay period - on the other extreme, there are folks in my directorate that I have not seen in over a year. Hails, farewells, LPD events, ceremonies, family support gatherings...
...nada

One of them was hired as a GS11 and now somehow "works from home" as a 13 - and managed to do so with the stroke of a pen...
...and my buddy is stuck doing ALL of the things that she apparently can't be bothered to show up for in person.

I reckon some people are just more equal than others.
 
Something outsiders don't understand is that commands and locations have autonomy for a variety of reasons. A one size fits all solution isn't the answer.

A large chunk of this EO/ directive is meant for the DC area, but the amateurs involved don't understand the width and breadth of the "problem."
 
The takeaway from these hearings reminds me of my favorite political axiom- "When your opponents are self destructing, stay out of their way."

RFK, Tulsi, and Kash were all great, but the Democrats were *historically* bad. Warren and Bernie ranting about onesies and getting paid by big Pharma- THAT'S what you got? Oh, man. Please continue.

Let me inject some white pilling into your world- Vance/Tulsi 2028. Think about that ticket with 4 years of what we have seen in the first two weeks?
 
I'm here for the winning, and I'm all about "strike while the iron is hot," but I'm worried that moving too broadly, too quickly is going to galvanize the other side and upset a large number of people who are fence-sitters or even supporters of the current regime.
 
I'm here for the winning, and I'm all about "strike while the iron is hot," but I'm worried that moving too broadly, too quickly is going to galvanize the other side and upset a large number of people who are fence-sitters or even supporters of the current regime.
The "flood the zone" tactic (happening now) calms down as the admin settles in, I think. I don't agree with your overall point, I am much more of a "head on pikes" guy, but I understand the risk of that.
 
Just wanted to share some craziness from the left. It's mentioned in the article below. But yeah... looks like some govt workers are planning on making a mess of things, instead of taking the buy out.


Oh and it looks like they're going crazy over some sabotage guide. It's actually where I found the reddit page. Did not know they had a page for govt workers... O_o.
Declassified CIA Guide to Sabotaging Fascism Is Suddenly Viral

Declassified CIA Guide to Sabotaging Fascism Is Suddenly Viral​

Jason Koebler ·Jan 29, 2025 at 3:52 PM

The World War II-era "Simple Sabotage Field Manual" is full of steps that office workers can take to resist leadership.

A declassified World War II-era government guide to “simple sabotage” is currently one of the most popular open source books on the internet. The book, called “Simple Sabotage Field Manual,” was declassified in 2008 by the CIA and “describes ways to train normal people to be purposefully annoying telephone operators, dysfunctional train conductors, befuddling middle managers, blundering factory workers, unruly movie theater patrons, and so on. In other words, teaching people to do their jobs badly.”

Over the last week, the guide has surged to become the 5th-most-accessed book on Project Gutenberg, an open source repository of free and public domain ebooks. It is also the fifth most popular ebook on the site over the last 30 days, having been accessed nearly 60,000 times over the last month (just behind Romeo and Juliet).


“Sabotage varies from highly technical coup de main acts that require detailed planning and the use of specially-trained operatives, to innumerable simple acts which the ordinary individual citizen-saboteur can perform,” the guide begins. “Simple sabotage does not require specially prepared tools or equipment; it is executed by an ordinary citizen who may or may not act individually and without the necessity for active connection with an organized group; and it is carried out in such a way as to involve a minimum danger of injury, detection, and reprisal.”

💡
Do you work for the federal government? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at +1 202 505 1702. Otherwise, send me an email at jason@404media.co.

The guide’s intro was written by William “Wild Bill” Donovan, who was the head of the Office of Strategic Services during World War II, which later inspired the creation of the CIA. The motivating factor for writing the guide, according to a passage within it, is that citizen saboteurs were highly effective at resisting the Nazis during World War II, and the Office of Strategic Services wanted to detail other ways sabotage could be done: “Acts of simple sabotage are occurring throughout Europe. An effort should be made to add to their efficiency, lessen their detectability, and increase their number,” the guide states. “Widespread practice of simple sabotage will harass and demoralize enemy administrators and police,” the guide states, adding that citizens often undertake acts of sabotage not for their own immediate personal gain, but to resist “particularly obnoxious decrees.”


Because it was written during active wartime, the book includes various suggestions for causing physical violence and destruction, such as starting fires, flooding warehouses, breaking tools, etc. But it also includes many suggestions for how to just generally be annoying within a bureaucracy or office setting. Simple sabotage ideas include:

  • “Insist on doing everything through ‘channels.’ Never permit short-cuts to be taken in order to expedite decisions.”
  • “Make ‘speeches.’ Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your ‘points’ by long anecdotes and accounts of personal experiences. Never hesitate to make a few appropriate ‘patriotic’ comments.”
  • “Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible.”
  • “Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions.”
  • “‘Misunderstand’ orders. Ask endless questions or engage in long correspondence about such orders. Quibble over them when you can.”
  • “In making work assignments, always sign out the unimportant jobs first. See that the important jobs are assigned to inefficient workers of poor machines.”
  • “To lower morale and with it, production, be pleasant to inefficient workers; give them undeserved promotions. Discriminate against efficient workers; complain unjustly about their work.”
  • “Hold conferences when there is more critical work to be done.”
  • “Multiply paperwork in plausible ways.”
  • “Make mistakes in quantities of material when you are copying orders. Confuse similar names. Use wrong addresses.”
  • “Work slowly. Think out ways to increase the number of movements necessary on your job”
  • “Pretend that instructions are hard to understand, and ask to have them repeated more than once. Or pretend that you are particularly anxious to do your work, and pester the foreman with unnecessary questions.”
  • “Snarl up administration in every possible way. Fill out forms illegibly so that they will have to be done over; make mistakes or omit requested information in forms.”
The guide also suggests “general devices for lowering morale and creating confusion,” which include “Report imaginary spies or danger to the Gestapo or police,” “act stupid,” “Be as irritable and quarrelsome as possible without getting yourself into trouble,” “Stop all conversation when axis nationals or quislings enter a cafe,” “Cry and sob hysterically at every occasion, especially when confronted by government clerks.”



It is impossible to say why this book is currently going viral at this moment in time and why it may feel particularly relevant to a workforce of millions of people who have suddenly been asked to agree to be “loyal” and work under the quasi leadership of the world’s richest man, have been asked to take a buyout that may or may not exist, have had their jobs repeatedly denigrated and threatened, have suddenly been required to return to office, have been prevented from spending money, have had to turn off critical functions that help people, and have been asked to destroy years worth of work and to rid their workplaces of DEI programs. Maybe it's worth wondering why the most popular post in a subreddit for federal workers is titled “To my fellow Feds, especially veterans: we’re at war.”
 
Last edited:
Back
Top