The Trump Presidency 2.0

Scholarships will often give extra points to applicants from states or areas that aren’t usually represented at their program. Like, you expect a ton of applicants to come from California, New York, and Texas not only because of their large population base but because of the large amount of academic resources available. But when you see a kickass candidate from West Virginia, which doesn't invest as many dollars per capita into education, the belief is that those candidates have to work much harder to achieve the same level of success than students from wealthier states. And that’s a proxy for the level of passion and dedication the student has for the subject.

I’ve been on the selection panel for a scholarship for several years and you see this pretty often. All the candidates have excellent scores and generally write good statements of purpose. But the ones who manage to do that without a bunch of built-in advantages will benefit the most from the scholarship.
And this makes sense. Thank you for the explanation. You see why it sounds crazy, though, to someone who doesn't know what you just typed?
 
And this makes sense. Thank you for the explanation. You see why it sounds crazy, though, to someone who doesn't know what you just typed?
Regional representation is common practice and... not racist. Giving people special treatment based on race, and/or denying people opportunities based on their race, is racism.
 
I voted for a CEO that had no off switch...why this chick was even granted this platform shows you everything that is wrong with late night stuff.

7 days a week?

Military veterans with multiple deployments:

No Problem Snl GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
Scholarships will often give extra points to applicants from states or areas that aren’t usually represented at their program. Like, you expect a ton of applicants to come from California, New York, and Texas not only because of their large population base but because of the large amount of academic resources available. But when you see a kickass candidate from West Virginia, which doesn't invest as many dollars per capita into education, the belief is that those candidates have to work much harder to achieve the same level of success than students from wealthier states. And that’s a proxy for the level of passion and dedication the student has for the subject.

I’ve been on the selection panel for a scholarship for several years and you see this pretty often. All the candidates have excellent scores and generally write good statements of purpose. But the ones who manage to do that without a bunch of built-in advantages will benefit the most from the scholarship.

I have seen a bit of a counter argument to this, and although the 'n' is pretty small comparatively, not sure what (if anything) could/should be done.

Kid from rural state/county has that 4.0 and checks the boxes, but the quality and rigor of their education was less than a peer coming from a certain city or certain county.

Again, I don't think this is a big problem, and I am all for advantages for lesser-represented kids to have a seat at the grown-up table if they have earned it.
 
Trump Enrages Christian MAGA By Naming ‘Heretic’ Pastor to White House

I never thought Trump was a “Christian” but it is funny to see people who thought he was like them be utterly dumbfounded by his insane choices. I don’t care about a faith office other than I think it is a stupid nonsense role. I look forward to DOGE cutting that entire office(because that would be efficient right?)

They not like us.
 
I mean, sure, whatever. Are they going to try and find similar soldiers stories to change back the other posts, or is it just Bragg?

This is what the Army gets for going with Liberty instead of Fort Beckwith I guess.

Or Shughart-Gordon, or Miller, or 25 other MOH winners with Airborne SOF lineage. This was a major fumble by the Army and the naming convention. That Benavidez didn’t get a base is a crime. Liberty was a failure in every way. I’m on record saying that Bragg was a shitty loser general, but they fucked this up.
 
This is what the Army gets for going with Liberty instead of Fort Beckwith I guess.

Or Shughart-Gordon, or Miller, or 25 other MOH winners with Airborne SOF lineage. This was a major fumble by the Army and the naming convention. That Benavidez didn’t get a base is a crime. Liberty was a failure in every way. I’m on record saying that Bragg was a shitty loser general, but they fucked this up.

I agree that if you're going to rename a base, Ft Bragg has generated so many extraordinary soldiers that it could be named after instead of that stupid ass name.

My issue is that so many soldiers identify with a base and the blood, sweat, and tears, that they have poured out that to rename it invalidates what they did.
 
I agree that if you're going to rename a base, Ft Bragg has generated so many extraordinary soldiers that it could be named after instead of that stupid ass name.

My issue is that so many soldiers identify with a base and the blood, sweat, and tears, that they have poured out that to rename it invalidates what they did.

If the name of the base validates someone as a person they have a weak ass resume.

Shit if anything it is just another way of saying “back when it was hard(Bragg)”
 
I mean, sure, whatever. Are they going to try and find similar soldiers stories to change back the other posts, or is it just Bragg?

This is what the Army gets for going with Liberty instead of Fort Beckwith I guess.
Or Shughart-Gordon, or Miller, or 25 other MOH winners with Airborne SOF lineage. This was a major fumble by the Army and the naming convention. That Benavidez didn’t get a base is a crime. Liberty was a failure in every way. I’m on record saying that Bragg was a shitty loser general, but they fucked this up.
Gonna preface this with me being a 1st Gen American. In essence, I'm an adopted outsider. Which means I don't buy into the whole race/guilt mentality. Unlike some of the peeps here, I didn't buy into the BLM/racism grift either. Cause ultimately, that was the impetus the previous admin used to reshape our military culture and tradition.

Let me explain. What the previous admin did was a calculated move. They essentially forced the DoD to bend the knee to a rabble of Neo-Marxist scum. Think of it as a humiliation ritual, with the botching of Afghanistan as their piece de resistance. The renaming of bases, the celebration of depravity, and the attack on core values, was no coincidence. It was meant to demoralize the force and sever the connection of past generations.

Fact of the matter is. Our shared heritage was destroyed by race baiting idiots. Who funnily enough were funded via embezzled tax dollars, ie the Tide Foundation and USAID. To further whit, Milley and Lloyd are now persona non grata because they were complicit in this.

So when I hear that we should have renamed US bases something different, complaints about Braxton Bragg, etc. What I really hear is discontent. Discontent that the previous admin failed at their tasking. But hey... I'm just a crazy rabbit ;-). What do I know?
 
Back
Top