There is no harm to union members, you're volunteering to leave.
Just to the ol' pocketbook of the union.
There is no harm to union members, you're volunteering to leave.
There is no harm to union members, you're volunteering to leave.
Where's the chaser?Shot.
Chaser.
'Clawed back': DHS chief Noem secures eye-popping sum sent to NYC for migrant hotels
"It was never happening!"
"Ok, it was happening, but not the way you said it was."
"Ok, it is happening the way you said it was, but you're really the problem for noticing."
"Ok, it is happening exactly the way that you said but it was a good thing and what are you going to do about it?"
(You are here)
This is one of those things where DOGE really, really should consult with DoD to just ask “Hey, what is this?” before blasting it out there. Having used TR services as part of my job, I’m pretty sure this is not funding what you think it is.Anyone defending any of this is an idiot.
SECDEF already on board. In fairness- I’m pretty sure this funding is *also* not what you think it is.This is one of those things where DOGE really, really should consult with DoD to just ask “Hey, what is this?” before blasting it out there. Having used TR services as part of my job, I’m pretty sure this is not funding what you think it is.
Right, I'm not disagreeing with this point.
The union has to wait until after the admin doesn't follow through with the email to sue.
The lack of follow through isn't guaranteed, but resignation wording and lack of appropriations makes it seem like it may not. Time will tell.
The Senate votes are kind of fascinating when you start to look at the breakdown of votes.
U.S. Senate: Roll Call Votes 119th Congress - 1st Session (2025)
What do you think it is?SECDEF already on board. In fairness- I’m pretty sure this funding is *also* not what you think it is.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
That's just the cultural engagement budget for 7th group.So if I see an item on the DoD spreadsheet for $1,350,000,500 for "booze, blow, and hoes," I am to infer it is not, in fact, for "booze, blow, and hoes"?
That's just the cultural engagement budget for 7th group.
That would be something like “Recreation & Party services”.So if I see an item on the DoD spreadsheet for $1,350,000,500 for "booze, blow, and hoes," I am to infer it is not, in fact, for "booze, blow, and hoes"?
Well yeah cause people are stupid- I took part in JADE HELM, and immediately discounted the public outcry because a lot of it came out of a small town in NM, where I was on the helicopters people reported as "taking over the mountain with SEALs". It's pretty simple to look at that event, look at the information given, and go, "Oh, this is dumb." No context needed.What do you think it is?
I agree that sunlight is the best disinfectant, however posting up line items from a spreadsheet with no context - good bad or otherwise - is just asking for misinterpretation. It’s how we got that stupid JADE HELM controversy in 2015. A spooky sounding name with some graphics leaks and a segment of the country lost their minds over it.
We need to be able to like a thing a million times.That's just the cultural engagement budget for 7th group.
Is he the last one of the President Trump's major cabinet picks still on the table?Ka$h advances out of Senate committee...
You have to get the local supplier to put it down as fuel on the receipt.I tried it once with my GTCC and they NJP'd me and took my card away....
Do you know how much OPFUND I have spent on "gravel" and "fuel"?You have to get the local supplier to put it down as fuel on the receipt.