- Joined
- Dec 22, 2006
- Messages
- 1,935
Priapism is a bitch.and when I think of Hillary, the next thing that pops into in my head is that mother fucking "revealing string bikini image"
...then I can't sleep for two or three days
Priapism is a bitch.and when I think of Hillary, the next thing that pops into in my head is that mother fucking "revealing string bikini image"
...then I can't sleep for two or three days
re: Hegseth leakers.
The man talking is a DoD Branch Chief- not super high up, but high enough up to not to be insubordiante on video cause he's on a date and being horny.
The video is damning enough- but here is my takeaway. How many of the arguments on these pages sound like this guy? Is this "resistance in support of the constitution," or is this anti-American sedition, undermining the administration from a position of power openly?
If it's the latter, and your argument against the SECDEF (appointed by the sole head of the Executive, the one person in America that every citizen votes for, and enacts the will of the populace) sounds like his- maybe you should really explore your argument and look internally. When your talking points align exactly with what @Marauder06 would label a great example of NOT the "deep state", maybe think about your internal biases.
To loosely quote my man Young Gerald- "Most of y'all should probably party less and focus more, and if my post resonates then you're the one I wrote it for." I had no one person or group in mind, but if this post makes you feel some type of way, then I am definitely talking to you.
He is probably high enough that he can be fired.re: Hegseth leakers.
The man talking is a DoD Branch Chief- not super high up, but high enough up to not to be insubordiante on video cause he's on a date and being horny.
The video is damning enough- but here is my takeaway. How many of the arguments on these pages sound like this guy? Is this "resistance in support of the constitution," or is this anti-American sedition, undermining the administration from a position of power openly?
If it's the latter, and your argument against the SECDEF (appointed by the sole head of the Executive, the one person in America that every citizen votes for, and enacts the will of the populace) sounds like his- maybe you should really explore your argument and look internally. When your talking points align exactly with what @Marauder06 would label a great example of NOT the "deep state", maybe think about your internal biases.
To loosely quote my man Young Gerald- "Most of y'all should probably party less and focus more, and if my post resonates then you're the one I wrote it for." I had no one person or group in mind, but if this post makes you feel some type of way, then I am definitely talking to you.
And that is all that's required. Everyone is allowed to like or dislike the admin- I am supportive of that.Calling the National Guard a "side hustle" discredits everything he says and he can go fuck himself. The 400 thousand+ Guardsmen should be pissed. Not like they stayed home and didn't die over the last 20-ish years...
I strongly disagree with SOME of the SECDEF's policies but I execute them faithfully. Why? Because his appointment is lawful. A Branch Chief is very low on the totem pole and usually a GS-14. This clown speaking out is like a cashier at Target/ Walmart/ Best Buy complaining about the CEO.
For the record I work around GS-12/ 13 equivalents. Some have very strong opinions about the current leadership and you know what they do? Show up to work and do their jobs.
I watched the video.re: Hegseth leakers.
The man talking is a DoD Branch Chief- not super high up, but high enough up to not to be insubordiante on video cause he's on a date and being horny.
The video is damning enough- but here is my takeaway. How many of the arguments on these pages sound like this guy? Is this "resistance in support of the constitution," or is this anti-American sedition, undermining the administration from a position of power openly?
If it's the latter, and your argument against the SECDEF (appointed by the sole head of the Executive, the one person in America that every citizen votes for, and enacts the will of the populace) sounds like his- maybe you should really explore your argument and look internally. When your talking points align exactly with what @Marauder06 would label a great example of NOT the "deep state", maybe think about your internal biases.
To loosely quote my man Young Gerald- "Most of y'all should probably party less and focus more, and if my post resonates then you're the one I wrote it for." I had no one person or group in mind, but if this post makes you feel some type of way, then I am definitely talking to you.
alladis. Bro, how many times has James O'Keefe and his team caught horny dudes talking out of school?! It's HILAROUS to me.I watched the video.
"Man, how the hell do they keep getting these people on camera talking all kinds of shit like this to total strangers?"
...and then I heard the voice of the young woman he was talking to. Who I imagine was like:
![]()
...when she and at least one other person there were like
![]()
Men are so dumb.
I'm glad I have a job that is so insignificant that no one is going to try to get me in a honey trap.
You know, it's really not that hard to not talk a bunch of shit about the administration--any administration--to total strangers. The most concerning thing to me is not necessarily how much this happens, but the comfort level of the people making these statements. How many more people must there be out there who have the same feelings and are doing the same kinds of things, but are either smart enough to not spew it to some doe-eyed intern they just met or just haven't been caught yet?
Oh well, Deep Staters gonna Deep State, I guess.
Good thing the Deep State doesn't exist, or else our republic would be in big trouble.
Wow, cancelled. This is objectively a good, not coordinated, and should be championed, not questioned....can federal judges be charged with sedition?
I watched the video.
"Man, how the hell do they keep getting these people on camera talking all kinds of shit like this to total strangers?"
...and then I heard the voice of the young woman he was talking to. Who I imagine was like:
![]()
...when she and at least one other person there were like
![]()
Men are so dumb.
I'm glad I have a job that is so insignificant that no one is going to try to get me in a honey trap.
You know, it's really not that hard to not talk a bunch of shit about the administration--any administration--to total strangers. The most concerning thing to me is not necessarily how much this happens, but the comfort level of the people making these statements. How many more people must there be out there who have the same feelings and are doing the same kinds of things, but are either smart enough to not spew it to some doe-eyed intern they just met or just haven't been caught yet?
Oh well, Deep Staters gonna Deep State, I guess.
Good thing the Deep State doesn't exist, or else our republic would be in big trouble.
The only reason I think he's being totally honest is the last 40 times O'Keefe has exposed folks like this and it turned out to be true and the other reason- as has always been since the beginning of times- horny dudes with some chance at banging a chick out of his league will 100% do whatever they need to do to get laid.Dudes be horny, which incentives answering questions girls ask, especially if it seems like she's interested in it.
He could he lying to get laid, or he could truly believe what he says. Either way, bad look on his part.
A true patriot, a guy that loves his job and the government and our shared morals and values, decided to make up a completely wild story with supporting facts and specific examples because he assumes the girl he's trying to bang is a wild liberal and that's what she wants to hear.
hahah agree to all, +3.To the bolded: it's the NCR, like 90% of young women are reliably starbucks Libs lol.
Doesnt matter to me if dude is being truthful or just lying to get laid; an inability to not shit talk your boss to some chick you've just met means he's a shithead.
Is it just me, or does it seem to only (or disproportionately) leftists being caught up in this kind of thing? Maybe it's just selection or confirmation bias on my part. And yes rightists (is that a word?) do PLENTY of cringy, shitty, and/or criminal stuff. But getting caught up in this kind of embarrassment? I haven't seen it.Dudes be horny, which incentives answering questions girls ask, especially if it seems like she's interested in it.
He could he lying to get laid, or he could truly believe what he says. Either way, bad look on his part.
I watched the video.
"Man, how the hell do they keep getting these people on camera talking all kinds of shit like this to total strangers?"
...and then I heard the voice of the young woman he was talking to. Who I imagine was like:
![]()
...when she and at least one other person there were like
![]()
Men are so dumb.
I'm glad I have a job that is so insignificant that no one is going to try to get me in a honey trap.
You know, it's really not that hard to not talk a bunch of shit about the administration--any administration--to total strangers. The most concerning thing to me is not necessarily how much this happens, but the comfort level of the people making these statements. How many more people must there be out there who have the same feelings and are doing the same kinds of things, but are either smart enough to not spew it to some doe-eyed intern they just met or just haven't been caught yet?
Oh well, Deep Staters gonna Deep State, I guess.
Good thing the Deep State doesn't exist, or else our republic would be in big trouble.