Wanna bet?
The Trump Presidency 2.0
- Thread starter Box
- Start date
Lol, I think the current odds are low it'd happen. Granted, he's had people on he dislikes before. Newsom being on prior to 2028 doesn't seem impossible, just unlikely.
Topkick
Verified Military
I wouldn't be surprised to see Newsom on Rogan's show. Outrage sells.
Last edited:
If he was willing to have Harris on, why wouldn't he have Newsom? Is there some personal animosity there? Not tracking.
Topkick
Verified Military
Like a lot of us, Rogan just thinks he's a crooked politician and wants him held accountable for his actions during Covid19. Forced vaccines, lockdowns, masks, etc. I've also heard him talk about Newsom's governing and all the reasons he and others are fleeing California. I remember Rogan speaking candidly about how he shouldn't have to look out his window and see homeless people lying on the sidewalk in front of his home. But, I do think Rogan would have him on the show because Americans want to see a good trainwreck. Personally, I'd prefer he don't because I'd like Newson to just vanish into thin air.
Joe Rogan ‘can’t imagine’ America wants ‘President Kamala Harris,’ calls Newsom a ‘f–king conman’
Yeah Joe HATES Newsom. He left Cali over Newsom (and getting taxed at like 60% of his $150M spotify deal).
The treatment Joe got during Covid, the Cali covid and vaccine stuff- Joe has called Newsom a con man on multiple occasions and takes the most umbrage with the push to vaccinate kids (the question Joe texted Shawn.) The kids angle* sticks in Joe's craw the absolute most, and for good reason, knowing what we know now.
Again, you can't know a person's true intentions from listening to a podcast or watching their social media, but by all available information Joe HATES Gavin and realizes he has the leverage of the most popular podcast in history- one that literally makes presidents- and I would bet a lot of money on Joe not platforming Gavin even if he was tough on him.
Last edited:
We all knew this. The question is, "Yeah but who cares and why drop it on a Friday if you want to distract from the current bad optics?"
Evereyone file this in multiple cabinets- the "Conspiracy Theorists Proven Right Again" file and the "Nothing Ever Happens File." The sad thing? Without the Epstein slow motion car wreck, this would be the biggest news story in recent memory. Ces la vie.
Obama admin assessed Russia played no role in 2016 election result, declassified docs show
Evereyone file this in multiple cabinets- the "Conspiracy Theorists Proven Right Again" file and the "Nothing Ever Happens File." The sad thing? Without the Epstein slow motion car wreck, this would be the biggest news story in recent memory. Ces la vie.
Obama admin assessed Russia played no role in 2016 election result, declassified docs show
ThunderHorse
Verified Military
But the Obama Administration did play a role in attempting to subvert the election. Steele Dossier. Chains. But hey, Obama is out there on a podcast talking about how the thing missing in young men's lives are gay mentors.
Yeah bro that's the point of the story. The admin knew it was all nonsense and then funded the stories through Fusion GPS and propagated the Russia Collusion hoax. We have all known that.
That Obama clip is just wild.
ThunderHorse
Verified Military
Some of you don't like In N Out...but how bad of a look is the Newsom press secretary showing?
It seems like the report concluded that Russia didn’t directly change votes through cyber attacks, rather than saying their hack-and-leak operation didn’t affect the election.
I don’t remember anyone claiming that Russia directly manipulated vote totals. I’m sure *someone* did, but the central argument behind the ‘Russian interference’ narrative is about the GRU’s hack-and-leak campaign.
Can we start here- how much do you actually know about Fusion GPS, HRCs campaign, and the Russia Gate hoax? Have you read any of the multitude of books or reports that show a complicit FBI, NSA, and CIA on the Obama approved and HRC propagated Steele dossier?
The report *did* conclude what you’re saying; that’s not the point. The point is- the Obama admin *knew this and approved the illegal FISA warrants to spy on a US president anyway*. They invented the crime, then looked for the person they already knew hey wanted to target.
To your second paragraph- do you remember people claiming for four years that Trump was a Russian Catspaw and worked directly with Russia to steal the election? You’re creating an argument here no one is arguing; but if you want, I can show you the MILLION VIDEOS OF EVERY DEMOCRAT CALLING TRUMP AN ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT BECAUSE RUSSIA HELPED HIM WIN THE ELECTION.
Let me speed to the end of this one- unless we change tack here, we are going to get into a very weird position where you’re gonna defend the biggest political scandal of our lifetimes.
Last edited:
Not bad at all. Maybe I just don't understand your view on this?
-> GOP offical says the whole company is leaving
-> Press Sec. highlights that the company is staying, the heiress is moving.
Topkick
Verified Military
Why is Lynsi leaving California?
Topkick
Verified Military
Once again, Newsom is certainly attempting to save his own face. Lynsi Snyder has been outspoken about the way CA is governed, but he isn't addressing why she is moving out of California, only that In N Out isnt leaving. Which is true.
Her stated reason is so she can oversee the development of their new eastern HQ as well as their expansion into states other than TN.
The podcast this all came from she made a comment about "raising a family in CA is hard". I'd be more inclined to believe that if she was a normal person, but she's a billionaire. You hit a certain budget and you kind of have unlimited ability to raise your kids how you want.
Another thing not directly said, but covered through the podcast, is she's a pretty involved Evangelist. I think its fair to say she'll find a better cultural/ministerial fit in Franklin.
Like most things, probably various percentages of all three are involved in her decision.
Overall point still stands that her moving does not equal "Newscum chased In-n-Out away".
Topkick
Verified Military
In the recent past she has also made clear that she's not happy with Newsom's actions during Covid, his handling of the Homeless, and having to close stores because of crime. And that she doesn't want to raise her kids in California. Newsom's not wrong but conveniently leaves those parts out.
Similar threads
