R.Caerbannog
Verified Military
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2015
- Messages
- 2,380
Ran into an interesting video of two young American journalists making the trip from South America to the US. Was going to post it in one of the China threads, but then saw some very interesting similarities. Mainly in how the United Nations and several NGO's have been aiding and abetting migrant flow into the Western world. This video below is focused on the Americas, but a couple decades ago there was a similar effort being carried out in Europe.
At this point you're probably wondering how this relates to modern conflict. As migrants from Northern Africa and the Middle East flooded into the EU, the cultural and political demography's of Europe changed. With these migrants came old feuds and cultural norms that don't integrate with a functioning Western society. Islamic radicalism, which had been a nonfactor, suddenly became an internal threat to Western populations.
All the while, UN affiliated NGO groups were providing aid, materials, and safe harbor for these incoming peoples. In Europe's case, this has led to sections of native populations being displaced or becoming minorities in their own regions. It also changed the political calculus in regards to defense sector spending and the readiness of these nations.
Which makes me wonder. What gain does the UN have with flooding stable Western countries with unvetted immigrants? Where are NGO groups getting the funding and political backing to conduct these operations? How many attack vectors are being led into our nations?
At this point you're probably wondering how this relates to modern conflict. As migrants from Northern Africa and the Middle East flooded into the EU, the cultural and political demography's of Europe changed. With these migrants came old feuds and cultural norms that don't integrate with a functioning Western society. Islamic radicalism, which had been a nonfactor, suddenly became an internal threat to Western populations.
All the while, UN affiliated NGO groups were providing aid, materials, and safe harbor for these incoming peoples. In Europe's case, this has led to sections of native populations being displaced or becoming minorities in their own regions. It also changed the political calculus in regards to defense sector spending and the readiness of these nations.
Which makes me wonder. What gain does the UN have with flooding stable Western countries with unvetted immigrants? Where are NGO groups getting the funding and political backing to conduct these operations? How many attack vectors are being led into our nations?
Last edited: