Thunderbird/ Blue Angel Crashes

Concur. I was thinking that a stand down for the F-16's might be in order. I'm sure it has been happening at the operational Wing level. Prolly not a bright idea to open post stand downs during a wartime footing.

The DoD releases that info and even if it didn't, aviation blogs would have the info within 48 hours.
 
Concur. I was thinking that a stand down for the F-16's might be in order. I'm sure it has been happening at the operational Wing level. Prolly not a bright idea to open post stand downs during a wartime footing.
16's have known engine problems, (one reason why the F-22/35 programs were/are important).

I'll go on a limb here and say the T-bird crash is fuel or engine related and the SCANG crash was guys being aggressive.
The Blue Angel report may be interesting, we lose what? 12-24 Fighters every year? AF Safety Center use to put a forecast out every FY predicting the number and types of frames they thought we'd lose, staggering numbers.
 
16's have known engine problems, (one reason why the F-22/35 programs were/are important).

I'll go on a limb here and say the T-bird crash is fuel or engine related and the SCANG crash was guys being aggressive.
The Blue Angel report may be interesting, we lose what? 12-24 Fighters every year? AF Safety Center use to put a forecast out every FY predicting the number and types of frames they thought we'd lose, staggering numbers.

When the first Falcons deployed to USAFE, the birds preceeded any replacement parts. Conequently, more than a few were turned into parts aircraft. It took nearly a month for enough parts showed up for all aircraft to be mission ready. One thing the we all were happy about, is that you could carry on phone conversations when the Falcons launched. They cut the nois level to almost a whisper, after hearing the F-4 thunderous launches.
 
Back
Top