Covid-19

As with the rioters in Portland, you're perfectly free to do things that legally compel authorities to give you up-close-and-personal treatment.

Just as the Kentucky couple did.

Title 902, Chapter 2, Section 50 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations:
“Section 2. Persons. Whenever any person has been implicated as a possible reservoir or possible source of infection of any communicable disease, the local health department or the Cabinet for Human Resources shall employ such measures as are necessary to secure adequate isolation, restriction of employment or other control procedures that may be necessary to insure cessation of transmission of infection.”

and

Chapter 212, Section 245(6) of the Kentucky Revised Statutes:
“County, city-county, and district health departments may:
(6) Issue written orders directed to the owner or occupant of any property, or to any person, firm, or corporation whatever, commanding, within the time and manner specified in the order, compliance with applicable public health laws of this state and all regulations of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services or the county board of health. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section and KRS 212.210, any health officer may institute and maintain mandatory or prohibitory injunction proceedings in the appropriate Circuit Courts of this state to abate nuisances that are or may be a menace to the health of the people of the state or community, and to compel compliance with the public health laws of this state and the rules and regulations of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services and the county board of health and the orders described in this section or in KRS 212.210.”

Moral of the story: If you don't like it, leave.

More specifically: Learn your local and state laws in advance, so that if you don't agree with them you can move someplace else before they restrict you from doing exactly that during a public health crisis.
You can not be compelled to sign anything that may be used against you.
That pesky 5th amendment.

Telling people to leave if they don't like it is pretty severe. Socialism much?
 
As with the rioters in Portland, you're perfectly free to do things that legally compel authorities to give you up-close-and-personal treatment.
Title 902, Chapter 2, Section 50 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations:
“Section 2. Persons. Whenever any person has been implicated as a possible reservoir or possible source of infection of any communicable disease, the local health department or the Cabinet for Human Resources shall employ such measures as are necessary to secure adequate isolation, restriction of employment or other control procedures that may be necessary to insure cessation of transmission of infection.”
Chapter 212, Section 245(6) of the Kentucky Revised Statutes:
“County, city-county, and district health departments may:
(6) Issue written orders directed to the owner or occupant of any property, or to any person, firm, or corporation whatever, commanding, within the time and manner specified in the order, compliance with applicable public health laws of this state and all regulations of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services or the county board of health. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section and KRS 212.210, any health officer may institute and maintain mandatory or prohibitory injunction proceedings in the appropriate Circuit Courts of this state to abate nuisances that are or may be a menace to the health of the people of the state or community, and to compel compliance with the public health laws of this state and the rules and regulations of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services and the county board of health and the orders described in this section or in KRS 212.210.”
Moral of the story: If you don't like it, leave.
More specifically: Learn your local and state laws in advance, so that if you don't agree with them you can move someplace else before they restrict you from doing exactly that during a public health crisis.
I had no idea not signing something without legal representation made me a rioter.
Federal HIPAA laws and 5th Amendment trump this.
Let me know when they start putting folks with herpes diagnosis under house arrest.

As for leaving, LOL, I stay to make change and right wrongs. It's what I do. Ask anyone who knows me.
 
You can not be compelled to sign anything that may be used against you.
Of course. You are entirely free to subject yourself to enforcement of the provisions of a judge-appointed court order by indicating your refusal to comply with it.
Telling people to leave if they don't like it is pretty severe. Socialism much?

1595736571955.png
You should ask him yourself.
I had no idea not signing something without legal representation made me a rioter.
Me neither. How did you infer that from my statement that rioters and people who communicate their refusal to comply with court orders both legally obligate authorities to give them up-close-and-personal treatment?.
Let me know when they start putting folks with herpes diagnosis under house arrest.
I'm afraid you'll have to wait until herpes expands past oral/anal/genital skin-to-skin contact into airborne and surface contact transmission.
 
My wife's friend that is an RN, I think I mentioned how she had the 'Rona. Anyway, her 14 days are up and she's back at work.

- There's growing skepticism among the doctors and nurses that the numbers they are reporting are the same being reported to the CDC. Like the motorcyclist who crashed and died but was reported as a CV-19 fatality, the books are being cooked somewhere.

- Their hospital sent off test swabs that were never used...and they tested positive for the 'Rona. This has happened on multple occasions.

- The hospital is quietly practicing herd immunity on its staff. They are rotating staff through the CV-19 ward/ area whatever you call it until they get it, then once recovered they go off to do their old jobs.

I can't say it enough, the numbers are bullshit. The disease is bad, I won't shit on that, but the statistics being thrown around are pure trash.
 
Of course. You are entirely free to subject yourself to enforcement of the provisions of a judge-appointed court order by indicating your refusal to comply with it.

View attachment 34985
You should ask him yourself.
Me neither. How did you infer that from my statement that rioters and people who communicate their refusal to comply with court orders both legally obligate authorities to give them up-close-and-personal treatment?.I'm afraid you'll have to wait until herpes expands past oral/anal/genital skin-to-skin contact into airborne and surface contact transmission.
Because you made the comparison.
"As with the rioters in Portland..."
Why bring it up?
 
Last edited:
As with the rioters in Portland, you're perfectly free to do things that legally compel authorities to give you up-close-and-personal treatment.

Just as the Kentucky couple did.

Title 902, Chapter 2, Section 50 of the Kentucky Administrative Regulations:
“Section 2. Persons. Whenever any person has been implicated as a possible reservoir or possible source of infection of any communicable disease, the local health department or the Cabinet for Human Resources shall employ such measures as are necessary to secure adequate isolation, restriction of employment or other control procedures that may be necessary to insure cessation of transmission of infection.”

and

Chapter 212, Section 245(6) of the Kentucky Revised Statutes:
“County, city-county, and district health departments may:
(6) Issue written orders directed to the owner or occupant of any property, or to any person, firm, or corporation whatever, commanding, within the time and manner specified in the order, compliance with applicable public health laws of this state and all regulations of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services or the county board of health. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section and KRS 212.210, any health officer may institute and maintain mandatory or prohibitory injunction proceedings in the appropriate Circuit Courts of this state to abate nuisances that are or may be a menace to the health of the people of the state or community, and to compel compliance with the public health laws of this state and the rules and regulations of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services and the county board of health and the orders described in this section or in KRS 212.210.”

Moral of the story: If you don't like it, leave.

More specifically: Learn your local and state laws in advance, so that if you don't agree with them you can move someplace else before they restrict you from doing exactly that during a public health crisis.
We have similar here, it’s fundamental that ‘the state’ has whatever power is necessary to mitigate the risk when the risk is realized.
 
My wife's friend that is an RN, I think I mentioned how she had the 'Rona. Anyway, her 14 days are up and she's back at work.

- There's growing skepticism among the doctors and nurses that the numbers they are reporting are the same being reported to the CDC. Like the motorcyclist who crashed and died but was reported as a CV-19 fatality, the books are being cooked somewhere.

- Their hospital sent off test swabs that were never used...and they tested positive for the 'Rona. This has happened on multple occasions.

- The hospital is quietly practicing herd immunity on its staff. They are rotating staff through the CV-19 ward/ area whatever you call it until they get it, then once recovered they go off to do their old jobs.

I can't say it enough, the numbers are bullshit. The disease is bad, I won't shit on that, but the statistics being thrown around are pure trash.
This is the crux of it. The honest truth of what is going on.
This isn't a proven population of Typhoid Marys running around being irresponsible. Most people are being very responsible for themselves. The fact is, the tests are inaccurate. But the consequences are very real.
 
Because you made the comparison.
"As with the rioters in Portland..."
This is about as logical as concluding that Christians are Muslims from the statement, "As with the Muslims, you are free to worship a single deity. Just as the Christians did."
Why bring it up?
Because they are another recent but perhaps more obvious example of people doing things that legally compel authorities to give them up-close-and-personal treatment.
 
We have similar here, it’s fundamental that ‘the state’ has whatever power is necessary to mitigate the risk when the risk is realized.
"Liked" just to acknowledge that this tracks with my understanding of the public acceptance and approval of state-led responses to public security and health risks in Commonwealth nations, and that the culturally ingrained and well-intended resistance to state-led control measures in the United States can sometimes backfire in more serious and widespread situations like health pandemics.
 
This is about as logical as concluding that Christians are Muslims from the statement, "As with the Muslims, you are free to worship a single deity. Just as the Christians did."Because they are another recent but perhaps more obvious example of people doing things that legally compel authorities to give them up-close-and-personal treatment.
Actual Crimes being committed vs someone unwilling to sign a piece of paper because they disagree with the legal language. Yeah, the judge put out an order, cool, where's the indictment? (there isn't one because there was no crime) This gets thrown out every day of the week.

Now back to the NBA:
Strippers are essential for the night before a Funeral. Why is it relevant? Because the NBA is in a bubble.

Lou Williams Admits He Went to Atlanta Strip Club With Rapper While Away from NBA Bubble

So I guess Magic City gets to stay open because they're a restaurant.


:rolleyes::ROFLMAO:



Steak and Lobster only $25!

https://www.magiccity.com/kitchen-menu/
 
Actual Crimes being committed vs someone unwilling to sign a piece of paper because they disagree with the legal language. Yeah, the judge put out an order, cool, where's the indictment? (there isn't one because there was no crime) This gets thrown out every day of the week.
There is a difference between what I posted and your focus on whether or not a person must be charged with a crime in order for authorities to be legally authorized to issue up-close-and-personal treatment.
 
There is a difference between what I posted and your focus on whether or not a person must be charged with a crime in order for authorities to be legally authorized to issue up-close-and-personal treatment.
Ankle bracelets are normally used for those out on bail. Ordered by a Judge, can you find which Judge ordered the ankle bracelet?
They can be ordered to quarantine, but the bracelets should not have been issued unless a quarantine violation occurred. Did they break quarantine?
 
Ankle bracelets are normally used for those out on bail. Ordered by a Judge, can you find which Judge ordered the ankle bracelet?
They can be ordered to quarantine, but the bracelets should not have been issued unless a quarantine violation occurred. Did they break quarantine?
Judge Ken Howard.

Enjoy.
 

Attachments

Yeah, that judge is an ass. I also remember when I had Soldiers going to Lincoln Trail for Mental Health counseling because Knox did not have psychologists. Let's just say I wouldn't trust Lincoln Trail Health District to take a dump when they have diarrhea swelling in their sphincter.
 
Judge Ken Howard.

Enjoy.
Yeah, that judge is an ass. I also remember when I had Soldiers going to Lincoln Trail for Mental Health counseling because Knox did not have psychologists. Let's just say I wouldn't trust Lincoln Trail Health District to take a dump when they have diarrhea swelling in their sphincter.
If the individuals went out knowing they were covid positive, then the authorities acted appropriately.
 
Back
Top