ThunderHorse
Verified Military
Just your government at work!
ETA: some more fun stuff.
ETA: some more fun stuff.
Last edited:
Sir, we don't drink scotch but we keep a bottle of TGL-18 here for you and the Troll.If any of you clowns show up at my house, you better bring The Glenlivet with you. ;)
Can't speak for ROTC, but when I was indentured as a platoon trainer at the Basic Course, etiquette was not in the POI...we did have an hour or so prior to the Dining In, but that was it...we did have both informal and formal receptions, each preceded by a briefing...that was in 1984-1985...That's some next-level stuff right there. I don't remember that in ROTC or the Basic Course.
We have Talisker's and Balvenie double wood, as well. And I take a dram from time to time...Sir, we don't drink scotch but we keep a bottle of TGL-18 here for you and the Troll.
Can't speak for ROTC, but when I was indentured as a platoon trainer at the Basic Course, etiquette was not in the POI...we did have an hour or so prior to the Dining In, but that was it...we did have both informal and formal receptions, each preceded by a briefing...that was in 1984-1985...
Right?! I just ordered him white tie evening wear. I shall be conducting the class myself. (Feel sorry for my poor hubby.)An hour? Push posh. How can you possibly understand how to properly wear your white gloves and present your calling card with an hour's instruction?
When I went through the basic course, we didn't even have a dining in or receptions...when I was a trainer, the basic course was trying to be pretty lean in extracurricular stuff. An hour for a dining in wasn't that much less than we had for land navigation. We had about a half day refresher on site, prior to sending the students out on a diagnostic course. The expectation was that the commissioning sources had done their job and prepared the new officers for what they were going to encounter in the course. We then conducted remedial training on weekends for the 50-70% of LTs that flunked the diagnostic test. That was very popular with the trainers, as we had to sacrifice our weekends until the no-gos passed another diagnostic test or perhaps managed to pass the first record test...in a typical 17 week cycle, we had an average of two or three weekends off.An hour? Push posh. How can you possibly understand how to properly wear your white gloves and present your calling card with an hour's instruction?
When I went through the basic course, we didn't even have a dining in or receptions...when I was a trainer, the basic course was trying to be pretty lean in extracurricular stuff. An hour for a dining in wasn't that much less than we had for land navigation. We had about a half day refresher on site, prior to sending the students out on a diagnostic course. The expectation was that the commissioning sources had done their job and prepared the new officers for what they were going to encounter in the course. We then conducted remedial training on weekends for the 50-70% of LTs that flunked the diagnostic test. That was very popular with the trainers, as we had to sacrifice our weekends until the no-gos passed another diagnostic test or perhaps managed to pass the first record test...in a typical 17 week cycle, we had an average of two or three weekends off.
Well shit.or an alcoholic) perhaps you don't bring that bottle of good Israeli red over to their house.
So, no box of wine from state store?
I don't want to make it sound like I would turn it down. Boone's Farm is totally my level of sophistication. I just don't like to drink wine much anymore if I can get something fancier... like Southern Comfort ;)So, no box of wine from state store?
I was in NYC today and stopped in to get some Chik Fil A (because, reasons) and the entire staff is wearing masks.To pile on to @ThunderHorse 's good post... things might get interesting with these emails. More so because there will be a full month to remind everyone how the administration treated free speech and colluded with big tech.
Feds reeling from new vax study, lawsuits on social media censorship and COVID stat manipulation
To pile on to @ThunderHorse 's good post... things might get interesting with these emails. More so because there will be a full month to remind everyone how the administration treated free speech and colluded with big tech.
Feds reeling from new vax study, lawsuits on social media censorship and COVID stat manipulation
Led by University of Washington applied medical anthropologist Kevin Bardosh, the study estimates that at least 22,000 "previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one Covid-19 hospitalisation" while causing 18-98 "serious adverse events," based on CDC and "sponsor-reported" data.
These include 1.7 to 3 "booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities," to prevent one hospitalization, the study found. "Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favourable."
You’re cancelled. Sorry, that’s the precedent for actually reading and following the data. Take your stuff and go to the front door of the internet; it’s an Ask Jeeves site that just has ‘naked bobs’ in the search window.The study is a real interesting meta-analysis. The findings, from the article;
I dug into the study, because there are lots of quotation marks in there and I wanted to see them in context.
To paraphrase the study;
It assumes the students have already received vaccinations, and will be getting the Pfizer booster.
It uses Pfizer's data on how many "serious adverse events" were directly tied to the vaccine. a SAE is a reaction that causes hospitalization, disability/incapacity, or death.
Reactogenicity rates are based on self reported numbers. Reactogenicity (I've learned) means the crappy feeling you get after a vaccine. Grade 3 is when it puts you on your ass the day after.
The myocarditis rate comes from the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink numbers, which actively tracks reactions to vaccines.
The "booster to prevent hospitalization rate" comes from the CDC.
So to "follow the science", the FDA should pull the Pfizer booster and the CDC should recommend no boosters for those not in high risk groups.
Sure, that'll happen.
The study is a real interesting meta-analysis. The findings, from the article;
I dug into the study, because there are lots of quotation marks in there and I wanted to see them in context.
To paraphrase the study;
It assumes the students have already received vaccinations, and will be getting the Pfizer booster.
It uses Pfizer's data on how many "serious adverse events" were directly tied to the vaccine. a SAE is a reaction that causes hospitalization, disability/incapacity, or death.
Reactogenicity rates are based on self reported numbers. Reactogenicity (I've learned) means the crappy feeling you get after a vaccine. Grade 3 is when it puts you on your ass the day after.
The myocarditis rate comes from the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink numbers, which actively tracks reactions to vaccines.
The "booster to prevent hospitalization rate" comes from the CDC.
So to "follow the science", the FDA should pull the Pfizer booster and the CDC should recommend no boosters for those not in high risk groups.
Sure, that'll happen.