Hillary Clinton's Private E-Mail Draws Scrutiny
- Thread starter Red-Dot
- Start date
The transcript of the statement for those who missed it:
Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System
The America we knew is dead... Long live America
Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System
The America we knew is dead... Long live America
Devildoc
Verified Military
I am not surprised. Disgusted, dismayed, sickened, yes. Surprised, no.
And I thought we were fucked with Libtards voting in the commie lover. But sorry to all of you, your rigged election will give you this corrupt Cunt. All to have the first woman in office.
BuckysBadger24
Member
:wall:Hey @RackMaster, did I mention how much I enjoy Canada. I hear Toronto is nice this time of year.
Maybe my lack of age is showing, but I just can't believe they aren't even trying to play the game anymore. Amendments to the constitution? Maybe it would help get us back on track.
The people forcing .gov to revert back to the original constitution would probably guarantee it. Fat chance, I know. What a shit show.
Devildoc
Verified Military
Comey lays out a case, issue after issue, then follows it up by saying...no charges. I mean, seriously, WTF. Basically he says she's just guilty of poor judgment. He has made a mockery of the FBI today. Now half of America have lost confidence in the FBI and "the process."
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2009
- Messages
- 4,304
I hop more lose faith but only to spur change.
Hey @RackMaster, did I mention how much I enjoy Canada. I hear Toronto is nice this time of year.
Maybe my lack of age is showing, but I just can't believe they aren't even trying to play the game anymore. Amendments to the constitution? Maybe it would help get us back on track.
The people forcing .gov to revert back to the original constitution would probably guarantee it. Fat chance, I know. What a shit show.
Toronto isn't to bad but it's like a cleaner Detroit. And the epicenter of Asshole Libtards in Canada. If you are fleeing the Cuntibeast, go to the East Coast or anywhere North. Closer to the border you get the worse it is.
I actually just read a story about an Alaskan village close to the border, it could be a final retreat for all of us.
http://nyti.ms/29pqmai
Florida173
SOF Support
So ultimately she is 100% guilty and completely above the law. Good to know.
I just lost a whole hell of a lot of respect for the FBI. Damn shame.
TLDR20
Verified SOF
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 6,245
Serious question.. Does anyone here know anyone who has been criminally prosecuted for mishandling (without malice) classified material, and can provide examples of that? From what I heard, and what the people who are experts in the law are saying, there just are not examples of this in the past. This would mean there isn't precedent, which makes me understand what the FBI is saying. I don't know how I feel about this, as I feel like someone should get in trouble. Again though I have only seen administrative punishments, never criminal ones.
This the law:
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Notice it even states "Gross negligence" and doesn't even address "Willful intent" in order to avoid disclosure, with regards to the wanton destruction of her e-mails. Legal precedent or not, that has (And should't have) any bearing in this matter. The law didn't just pop up out of no where or was written after the fact. It's been around for sometime now.
The FBI just rewrote it. No sense granting clearances any longer. No need for intelligence agencies to exist any longer, and no need for anything, material or otherwise, to be classified in matters pertaining to our national defense.
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Notice it even states "Gross negligence" and doesn't even address "Willful intent" in order to avoid disclosure, with regards to the wanton destruction of her e-mails. Legal precedent or not, that has (And should't have) any bearing in this matter. The law didn't just pop up out of no where or was written after the fact. It's been around for sometime now.
The FBI just rewrote it. No sense granting clearances any longer. No need for intelligence agencies to exist any longer, and no need for anything, material or otherwise, to be classified in matters pertaining to our national defense.
A couple of things I find odd.
You had Bill that supposedly had a "Chance run in" and then, meeting with our Attorney General last week.
You had Hillary interviewed Saturday and now, all of a sudden, after all this time, this announcement comes just before Obama and Clinton are scheduled TODAY to make a joint campaign appearance together?
No. If this had been up in the air, or unresolved, there is no way...none whatsoever, the 2 of them would be together on air flappy one right now. They already knew the outcome before it was ever officially released.
You had Bill that supposedly had a "Chance run in" and then, meeting with our Attorney General last week.
You had Hillary interviewed Saturday and now, all of a sudden, after all this time, this announcement comes just before Obama and Clinton are scheduled TODAY to make a joint campaign appearance together?
No. If this had been up in the air, or unresolved, there is no way...none whatsoever, the 2 of them would be together on air flappy one right now. They already knew the outcome before it was ever officially released.
Florida173
SOF Support
Maybe General Petreus?
At the very least I have known people to have accidently spilled classified material down and have lost their clearances because of it.
So the AG gets to keep her job until the statute of limitations runs out.
Awesome.
Awesome.
TLDR20
Verified SOF
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 6,245
[/QUOTE]
So a misdemeanor is the most serious charge that has been successfully prosecuted?
Make no mistake about it, high ranking gov officials may not recieve much more than a fine. But if any one of us did what HRC did, we would be in prison, and never work in anything government again, much less getting elected to the highest office in our gov.
Last edited:
