When you advocate for the killing of anyone in your speeches, is that not incitement? The standard for incitement seems to be incredibly low.
Maybe I'm watching the wrong news - but it seems like "ends justify the means" resides at the very core of our nations political structure.
Both parties - without shame.
But again, I could be watching the wrong news - I admittedly get most of my themes and messaging from South Park reruns.
You are a lawyer, correct? Bar member or whatever your craft requires?
And you want to restrict the 1st Amendment?
The FBI literally targeted parents who protested against LGBTQ phonographic material taught to their children. We are a nation of laws and yet Hamas radicals and the communists, who burned down cities, are celebrated and allowed to do as they please. Historically, when a minority acts out and tries to destroy a welcoming society they either succeed or are wiped out.You are literally calling for the abolishment of the First Amendment. Cool.
I do tend to think some of your memes are funny, and I believe you are probably pretty intelligent, hell we might agree more than we disagree, but when you (and others) pepper your posts with slang and insults, it takes away from whatever point you are trying to make. “Useful idiots” is one of my favorites.
You're right. That said, I think we're at war. I think we've been at war for some time. It's just now that people are starting to realize the enemy is in the wire. When a people and culture are trying to kill yours, sometimes you have to take the gloves off and be uncivilized.No bans.
I agree but do two wrongs make a right?
You don't have to agree with it but it's not illegal to be anti anything you want. It's illegal/ immoral to act on it. If someone is provoked by words, hold that person accountable. You don't throw people in jail for being racist or for their antisemitism, you throw'em jail for harming the people they hate.
Pretty sure the rule of law and social contract are in tatters. The "laws" that govern people don't really matter when the other party disregards them. The people at the Israeli rave assumed that the laws of civilization and it's institutions would protect them, yet here we are. The people who were burned alive, tortured, and shot were living in a civilized world, until it wasn't.The laws you use against others are the laws they will use against you. Those suppressing free speech are rarely (if ever) the good guys.
The thing I have noticed about these pro-Palestinian protests is the lack of real condemnation of what Hamas did. Maybe I'm not looking at the right ones, but the ones I have seen all seem focused on speaking about Israel's retaliation and even the ones who do speak about Hamas' cowardly attack always seem to do the but or try to give an around-about way in blaming Israel for Hamas attacking. I don't know what Israel should do a part of me strongly believes bombing and laying siege to Gaza is wrong, and that Israel should show mercy. However, another part feels the Palestinians are hostile people, the majority support Hamas and their actions, and Israel should stomp on them until they are broken; otherwise, they won't stop.
As for the protests, I am against curtailing free speech. Yes, I know one side has done it a lot, and it would be fair to do the sam, but I dont think it is right to do just because they have done it. Also, it is a losing optic. The left has a high control of the media narrative, and reducing their free speech does nothing but strengthen their message to their audience that the right are a bunch of fascists in training.
I like napalm
Ask ObamaAs bloody as this is, this is essentially a propaganda war. Hamas wins by not losing--simply surviving the conflict. Israel loses by any other outcome beyond the annihilation of Hamas. The only real question I have is how long Israel gets let off the leash before the protests drive a political solution that will, ultimately, hand Hamas a win.
I like napalm
