The point? You missed it or just wanted to argue or whatever.
I don't care that he was wrong about Iran because I think he was wrong about Iran. Again, my point is that if he was so much of a threat they threw him out of briefings, he was a known leaker for months, why wasn't he on charges or at least fired? Instead they retained him as head of the NCTC and banned him from briefings? That doesn't track. He was either a threat to national security or he wasn't. If he was, why wasn't he charged and/ or fired? That's what doesn't make sense. Either members of the admin knew and did nothing or he didn't leak info, because their actions do not support the former.