Super Sweet Movie Discussion Thread

Oppenheimer

The movie stars Florence Pugh's magnificent breasts, Emily Blunt, and some dudes I've seen somewhere. Joker from that Marine movie, Good Will Hunting, that Irish gangster fellow, and Iron Man all make an appearance.

For some reason, the film is titled Oppenheimer but I don't think that's what Florence Pugh calls her magnificent chest region. I doubt Emily Blunt refers to herself as Oppenheimer, so I can only conclude that word refers to one of the dudes.

The film is very good, though it switches between black and white, past and present, Florence Pugh with and without clothes. Emily Blunt affects a soft Southern accent capable of luring me towards a divorce while Florence Pugh's magnificent breasts lurk in the background. For some reason, this first time scrub director elected to focus on guys instead of Florence Pugh and Emily Blunt; I can only conclude he is gay.

Anyway, there's science and stuff, plus Florence Pugh and Emily Blunt. The story appears to center on the race to expose Japan to the bright shining light of freedom, but appears to sideline Florence and Emily to supporting actresses or something because the director is a scrub.

The story is quite good, though jumping between color and black and white is a bit off-putting. It's obvious the director doesn't understand his cast or else he'd feature the FloBlunt show more often. Personally, I'd prefer to watch 2 hours of the FloBlunt Scissoring Show, but for some reason this gay man wants us to see science and dudes.

I think it's worth a watch, just don't expect too much from the stars of the show, Florence Pugh's magnificent breasts. 1 out of 5 mushroom clouds unless you like acting and dudes, then it becomes a 4.5 out of 5.
 
Despite my cheeky post above, which I stand by, Oppenheimer is very, very good. Still 4.5 out of 5 (I should probably go to a 10 point scale), it is rather powerful, insightful, and moving in the last 30-45 minutes. It is a great movie if you're willing to think.

Also, Emily Blunt or Florence Pugh could give me an STD through sexual intercourse (Blunt over Pugh by a hair) and I'd still break their backs so hard they would need physical therapy just to sit in a wheelchair. I would move those guts so much I could be an interior designer. I'd beat them so bad the CIA's Guantanamo office couldn't offer a defense. I'd...never have a fucking chance. Let's be real.

But those would be the best 15 seconds of my life.

Also, go watch Oppenheimer. It's a really good movie. Seriously. Great cast, great story, and worth your time.

And if Emily or Florence are reading this? Drop me a PM. I respond to @SpongeBob*24 within 2 weeks, but you two...my door is always open.

9 out of 10 kangaroo courts
 
Civil War: More about combat or war zone journalists than an actual U.S. Civil War...

Pretty good story, not over done with action though the scenes are bad ass. You never really know the background or which side is supposed to be the "good guys". They make it look like atrocites on all sides, bombed out downtowns and malls etc.

I think they really missed an opportunity to make a 3 hour long epic Civil War 2.0 movie and wasted the topic on a 90 min. basic ass film...

3/5 Chinese made explosive drones
 
BlackSmokeRisinG said:
Civil War: More about combat or war zone journalists than an actual U.S. Civil War...

Pretty good story, not over done with action though the scenes are bad ass. You never really know the background or which side is supposed to be the "good guys". They make it look like atrocites on all sides, bombed out downtowns and malls etc.

I think they really missed an opportunity to make a 3 hour long epic Civil War 2.0 movie and wasted the topic on a 90 min. basic ass film...

3/5 Chinese made explosive drones
Click to expand...
I believe the Director wanted the focus to be more on the impact of a civil war than the actual cause
 
BlackSmokeRisinG said:
Civil War: More about combat or war zone journalists than an actual U.S. Civil War...

Pretty good story, not over done with action though the scenes are bad ass. You never really know the background or which side is supposed to be the "good guys". They make it look like atrocites on all sides, bombed out downtowns and malls etc.

I think they really missed an opportunity to make a 3 hour long epic Civil War 2.0 movie and wasted the topic on a 90 min. basic ass film...

3/5 Chinese made explosive drones
Click to expand...

Isn't that kinda the point? Both sides think their cause is righteous. Only today are we trying to destroy the reconciliation process. Almost 200 years later. The scars of the US Civil War are incredibly deep, and the amount of people trying to open them are wild.
 
In my eyes, and I think the future will prove me correct, we are no where near an actual civil war. This movie has about the same cultural significance of World War Z or The Walking Dead so I was hoping for an epic story line.

The acting was good, and the story was interesting. But I felt let down by it because I was expecting more. I read a few reviews of it saying it was a pointless storyline with no resolution, but I went anyway. In the end, the civil war part was just background and the touching character reflections that develop just fade away in the final scenes.
 
AWP said:
Oppenheimer

The movie stars Florence Pugh's magnificent breasts, Emily Blunt, and some dudes I've seen somewhere. Joker from that Marine movie, Good Will Hunting, that Irish gangster fellow, and Iron Man all make an appearance.

For some reason, the film is titled Oppenheimer but I don't think that's what Florence Pugh calls her magnificent chest region. I doubt Emily Blunt refers to herself as Oppenheimer, so I can only conclude that word refers to one of the dudes.

The film is very good, though it switches between black and white, past and present, Florence Pugh with and without clothes. Emily Blunt affects a soft Southern accent capable of luring me towards a divorce while Florence Pugh's magnificent breasts lurk in the background. For some reason, this first time scrub director elected to focus on guys instead of Florence Pugh and Emily Blunt; I can only conclude he is gay.

Anyway, there's science and stuff, plus Florence Pugh and Emily Blunt. The story appears to center on the race to expose Japan to the bright shining light of freedom, but appears to sideline Florence and Emily to supporting actresses or something because the director is a scrub.

The story is quite good, though jumping between color and black and white is a bit off-putting. It's obvious the director doesn't understand his cast or else he'd feature the FloBlunt show more often. Personally, I'd prefer to watch 2 hours of the FloBlunt Scissoring Show, but for some reason this gay man wants us to see science and dudes.

I think it's worth a watch, just don't expect too much from the stars of the show, Florence Pugh's magnificent breasts. 1 out of 5 mushroom clouds unless you like acting and dudes, then it becomes a 4.5 out of 5.
Click to expand...

AWP said:
Despite my cheeky post above, which I stand by, Oppenheimer is very, very good. Still 4.5 out of 5 (I should probably go to a 10 point scale), it is rather powerful, insightful, and moving in the last 30-45 minutes. It is a great movie if you're willing to think.

Also, Emily Blunt or Florence Pugh could give me an STD through sexual intercourse (Blunt over Pugh by a hair) and I'd still break their backs so hard they would need physical therapy just to sit in a wheelchair. I would move those guts so much I could be an interior designer. I'd beat them so bad the CIA's Guantanamo office couldn't offer a defense. I'd...never have a fucking chance. Let's be real.

But those would be the best 15 seconds of my life.

Also, go watch Oppenheimer. It's a really good movie. Seriously. Great cast, great story, and worth your time.

And if Emily or Florence are reading this? Drop me a PM. I respond to @SpongeBob*24 within 2 weeks, but you two...my door is always open.

9 out of 10 kangaroo courts
Click to expand...

You have out-Boxed the interwebz
 
Oppenheimer. The bomb detonation. I’ve seen grenade blasts in war movies make bigger explosions. We’ve had, what, 10,000 nuclear tests on this planet and they choose not to use actual footage?

I had a buddy named Ed in high school who could light his farts through his jeans. He held the lighter down there and did the deed and there’d be this amazing burst of blue flame. It was more entertaining than Oppenheimer.
 
Last edited:
Just saw Civil War. Since it just arrived in theaters, I won't say a lot other than to say it was disappointing/not what I expected. It was slow, uncompelling, and I didn't care about any of the characters.

Looking for The Ministry of Ungentlemenly Warfare to make up for it this weekend.
 

Similar threads

Marauder06
The Illegal Drug Discussion Thread
2 3
Replies
44
Views
4K
Muppet
Muppet
T
I need guidance from people I want to be like. (Contractor related)
Replies
5
Views
1K
LimaPanther
LimaPanther
Ooh-Rah
Enlistment to SOF - The ShadowSpear Way
Replies
1
Views
3K
Ooh-Rah
Ooh-Rah
Marauder06
Mini Case Study: Advising the Iraqi Air Force
2
Replies
20
Views
3K
CQB
CQB
C
I need some advice.
Replies
17
Views
2K
chickenrappa
C
Back
Top