I’d stop connecting dots if you stopped making dots."Vast, right-wing conspiracy."
I’d stop connecting dots if you stopped making dots."Vast, right-wing conspiracy."
That kid won't be so smug once the last of his USAID porridge runs out.
Bro they’re dying. They can’t figure it out- mid range podcasts SMOKE cnn every day. MSNBC getting parsed out and killed. They’re shouting into the void.
The MSM failed, just like the tech bros at Facebook and other socials. Zuckerfuck's apparent rebirth shouldn't be celebrated, it should be viewed with a cynical eye. This is a man who KNEW he chose the MSM over Trump, COVID, and everything he deemed to be wrong in America. The tides change, the tables turn, and suddenly he's on the Rights side?
Two, the Gaza thing is the dumbest thing I have heard. I know he knows we don't want any part of that.
Five, does anyone actually believe the intel community doesn't have journalists on retainer?
Talk about asserting dominance. By putting forth this plan, he presents it as a foregone conclusion, and something that the US (he) can do by fiat.Two: I agree. Kooky as hell. But brilliant, too. I believe it was thrown out there just to shock and spur other countries (Jordan, Egypt, Saudis, etc.) to get off their asses and come up with a solution for their own region that's not kooky.
Five: Any journalist who's kicked around for any length of time, who's been involved in coverage of certain dark dealings, (like anything in Central America, ever) will have had encounters with a Steve from Pittsburgh or a John from Spokane. I can tell you personally, I was always glad to share info with my military or political sources if I felt that info would facilitate and complement that source's desired result...and not compromise my conservative views. If they wanted to pay me with liquor and free food, I was in.
Two: I agree. Kooky as hell. But brilliant, too. I believe it was thrown out there just to shock and spur other countries (Jordan, Egypt, Saudis, etc.) to get off their asses and come up with a solution for their own region that's not kooky.
I don't think he has Tourette's or just blurting out the first thing on his mind like some Rorschach test, I think he 'sees' an end-state or goal and basically free-associates, which makes his team nervous as hell, confuses others, and scares the hell out and pisses off of the opposition. Some of what he says I can see in my mind's eye where he's going, but this one, I was like, "Gaza? WTF, man?"
He'll be fine. USAID embezzled most of it. Govt contractors OTOH...That kid won't be so smug once the last of his USAID porridge runs out.
So what would be better clearance wise? Gracefully take a bow by taking the downsizing deal or being unwillingly terminated/downsized/fired?Yall are noobs at the security clearance stuff. When you leave your job, your access is revoked, but you maintain ELIGIBILITY to be granted access again in the future.
Depends where you're at in your investigation cycle. If your five year is coming up, you'll want to be with someone that will initiate it. Since we're in CE, the turnaround is about two weeks from the time your EQIP is submitted. Companies are hurting for people so there's a chance they'll bring you on even if you are out of scope or lack a clearance. Just depends if that particular skillset is easy to fill or not.So what would be better clearance wise? Gracefully take a bow by taking the downsizing deal or being unwillingly terminated/downsized/fired?
sample deferred resignation agreement sent to federal workers Monday evening raises more concerns about the offer’s validity. In addition to outlining the timetable—resigning employees would continue to work until Feb. 28, after which they would be placed on paid administrative leave—the document requires employees to waive their right to pursue litigation—administrative or judicial—against the agency and waives that right on behalf of unions who may represent them.
The sample agreement also has an apparent loophole: an agency head may rescind the deal at any time.
“By signing this agreement, the parties acknowledge that they have entered the agreement knowingly, voluntarily and free from improper influence, coercion or duress,” it states. “Employee understands that this agreement cannot be rescinded, except in the sole discretion of the [agency head], which shall not be subject to review at the Merit Systems Protection Board or otherwise.”
Fed resignations delayed until (at least) Feb 10th.
The union is suing for two reasons we've repeatedly brought up; lack of funding last March 14th and lack of an analysis of where cuts are authorized. (DOD, as of Today's deadline, still hasn't identified all exemptions for an example).
They're suing to delay the program until April, if it is found to be legal.
I stopped reading the emails, but apparently part of the deal is Giving up rights to litigation and allowing the agency head to rescind the deal.
I'll take one extra day of unfucked parking.Yup. We received word about 2 hours ago our mandatory RTO was pushed from Friday the 7th to Monday the 10th. I suspect that date will continue to slip to the right in fits and spurts.
I had the same typed in a draft for proofread and post. Access and eligibility are two different things, and access is terminated as soon as you leave a position (even if moving right next door). Your next job can grant access to you again, but that's up to them and their mission-based need for you to have access.Yall are noobs at the security clearance stuff. When you leave your job, your access is revoked, but you maintain ELIGIBILITY to be granted access again in the future.