Kraut783
SOF Support
Yup, that's it. Some in a different format...but...yeah
Yup, that's it. Some in a different format...but...yeah
What’s the downside? It already works like that, might as well work like that at a cost savings.Imagine him and his doofus bros reading through 4.5 million 5 bullet point messages.
Your federal government is getting cut by someone with no idea how it works, what people do, without clearance or access to programs that are being cut. Everything is gonna work like the DMV moving forward…
What’s the downside? It already works like that, might as well work like that at a cost savings.
What’s the downside? It already works like that, might as well work like that at a cost savings.
It’s good that Trump has made it legal to say “retarded” again, because this is fucking retarded
I guess I've resigned since I won't hit this deadline?
This is a consistent thing with Musk; he's making threats that can't legally be backed up.
It’s good that Trump has made it legal to say “retarded” again, because this is fucking retarded
Super agree! The country is getting back to normalcy, where words aren't violent; they're just descriptions of events. Much more baselining to follow.It’s good that Trump has made it legal to say “retarded” again, because this is fucking retarded
I would assume this is pretty easy to do, considering he commands the single most powerful AI infrastructure in the history of the universe. Which "doofus bros" are you referring to? Anyone in particular you can name, or are they just all generally doofuses?Imagine him and his doofus bros reading through 4.5 million 5 bullet point messages.
Super agree! The country is getting back to normalcy, where words aren't violent; they're just descriptions of events. Much more baselining to follow.
I would assume this is pretty easy to do, considering he commands the single most powerful AI infrastructure in the history of the universe. Which "doofus bros" are you referring to? Anyone in particular you can name, or are they just all generally doofuses?
As to the other two posts, I tend to favor an entire body of work more than a singular good experience. I have different personal experiences, but those are singular, so I don't think they hold much weight. They weren't positive, but I would have a hard time painting an organization (IRS in this case) with 83K people as good or bad off of one interaction.
The government is gluttonous, slow, inefficient, and orders of magnitude larger than the founders ever intended, with a lack of appropriate checks and balances. No one likes change or new things- but we can all get there together.
Exciting times!
You do realize a lot of those positions will be filled by contractors, right? And the burden rate will be higher, so at what cost savings? You might get away with removing or closing other agencies, but the DoD is not the same.What’s the downside? It already works like that, might as well work like that at a cost savings.
This is a mix of strawman and a false binary, so I’m just gonna reject the premise out of hand. Here-So you are ok with an AI, you have no idea how is vetted, trained, or overseen deciding on who or what the government spends money on?
… who said anything about the DoD? Certainly I didn’t. We were talking (initially) about the DMV, then that drifted to the VA, then the IRS.You do realize a lot of those positions will be filled by contractors, right? And the burden rate will be higher, so at what cost savings? You might get away with removing or closing other agencies, but the DoD is not the same.