The Trump Presidency 2.0

Only an act of congress can officially get rid of it but Trump can effectively do the same thing via 'death by a thousand cuts'....funding cuts here, staffing cuts there, moving certain programs to other departments.

If the front door is locked, go through the back.
And that is exactly what he's doing- moving school lunch under HHS, cutting the rot of funding administrators and their lavish paychecks as opposed to students, etc.

It's not all 7d chess all the time, but in this case, it's a well thought out plan of attack.
 
This is what I was getting at the other day!
Conservatives will double or triple layer gloves, but libs will give up once their nose gets a bit runny.
I was in grad school at Yale during the latter years of the Occupy protests. Some undergrads set up some tents in the Occupy space on the New Haven Green, which abuts part of campus. I was walking to class one day and I noticed the tents and the signs and they Yale protesters. I thought the entire protest was stupid, but I remarked to a colleague that I respected them for being out there in the snow and ice and cold (Connecticut in the winter) overnight. As an Army veteran approaching his 40s who spent plenty of time outdoors in the cold (thanks Korea and Afghanistan!), I wouldn't do it, even if I believed in the Occupy cause... which I didn't... because it was stupid.

Related story: Yalies stole from Occupy New Haven, Occupiers say

Anyway, my colleague informed me that I was mistaken. "They're not living there, bro." I was stunned. It sure looked like they were living there. The signs and slogans indicated they were. "It's all an act." I came back through the same area at night a few days later and it looked like he was right. While there were some hard core protesters out there who were physically living in the park, most people weren't. They'd make a big show about setting up a tent and posting signs and shouting slogans when the cameras were pointed at them, but then they'd slink back to campus to hot chow and warm beds at night.

Like many such political actions, it was purely performative.
 
I combined the numbers from below, Obama and Biden had 80.77% of actions from judges appointed from rebublican leadership; Trump is at 88.75%. I know per capita is troublesome, but those are the numbers. That ignores the fact that Trump is getting challenged 515.38% more than Biden/Obama combined.

@Cookie_ I posted it before- Obama and Biden had a total of 21 combined legal challenges. Trump is at 142 (and climbing, daily, 83 just in the last 60 days).

ETA- those numbers are "opposite party installed judges legally challenging EOs".
 
I was in grad school at Yale during the latter years of the Occupy protests. Some undergrads set up some tents in the Occupy space on the New Haven Green, which abuts part of campus. I was walking to class one day and I noticed the tents and the signs and they Yale protesters. I thought the entire protest was stupid, but I remarked to a colleague that I respected them for being out there in the snow and ice and cold (Connecticut in the winter) overnight. As an Army veteran approaching his 40s who spent plenty of time outdoors in the cold (thanks Korea and Afghanistan!), I wouldn't do it, even if I believed in the Occupy cause... which I didn't... because it was stupid.

Related story: Yalies stole from Occupy New Haven, Occupiers say

Anyway, my colleague informed me that I was mistaken. "They're not living there, bro." I was stunned. It sure looked like they were living there. The signs and slogans indicated they were. "It's all an act." I came back through the same area at night a few days later and it looked like he was right. While there were some hard core protesters out there who were physically living in the park, most people weren't. They'd make a big show about setting up a tent and posting signs and shouting slogans when the cameras were pointed at them, but then they'd slink back to campus to hot chow and warm beds at night.

Like many such political actions, it was purely performative.

Pussies. Duke students will camp out for 6 weeks regardless of the weather just to get tickets to the UNC basketball game. And they still manage to go to class and be decent citizens.
 
Only an act of congress can officially get rid of it but Trump can effectively do the same thing via 'death by a thousand cuts'....funding cuts here, staffing cuts there, moving certain programs to other departments.

If the front door is locked, go through the back.
He actually can't do that either without a change to the budget. Power of the purse, Congress gave Department of Ed a budget. This is where this DOGE strategy is going off the effing rails.

Honestly fine with cutting back a bunch of headcounts in Department of Ed to do what it's supposed to do really. Enforce Title IX and run the student loan program and not provide grants for people to do their PhD in intersectional studies and the impact of transvestite microaggressions...
 
He actually can't do that either without a change to the budget. Power of the purse, Congress gave Department of Ed a budget. This is where this DOGE strategy is going off the effing rails.

Honestly fine with cutting back a bunch of headcounts in Department of Ed to do what it's supposed to do really. Enforce Title IX and run the student loan program and not provide grants for people to do their PhD in intersectional studies and the impact of transvestite microaggressions...
This is a great comment. It’s really a shame that America’s children can’t read it thanks to the department of education’s very real and decades old failure.

I’m just excited to get back to an agreement where the left and the right are having valuable conversations about what a president can and can’t do again- where were all these constitutional scholars during the student loan forgiveness, OSHA vaccine mandate, and flying illegal immigrants to the interior of the United States? Coulda used them then.

Defund department of education. Shutter it. Fund the student, not the system.
 
Last edited:
This is a great comment. It’s really a shame that America’s children can’t read it thanks to the department of education’s very real and decades old failure.

I’m just excited to get back to an agreement where the left and the right are having valuable conversations about what a president can and can’t do again- where were all these constitutional scholars during the student loan forgiveness, OSHA vaccine mandate, and flying illegal immigrants to the interior of the United States? Coulda used them then.

Defund department of education. Shutter it. Fund the student, not the system.

I can't really tell the tone of this. The purpose of the Federal Department of Education is a governance office. They enforce the law. I suppose we can give what they do to the FBI and stuff.

The reason children can't read in Illinois is a Springfield problem. The reason children graduate without being able to do simple math in Florida is a Tallahassee problem.

Associations do the credentialling for schools. Then state Departments of Education are the ones who administer the laws but actually do things. Fuck up really bad, the state takes over your school, fuck up worse? Maybe they take over your district. And I can tell you most of the time that cycle is hard to break out of. So whose at the local level in Illinois for those 30 odd schools? The School board, probably Democrats who want to push things like Diversity, Equity, and inclusion.

There are plenty of other things to do, less welfare entitlements for people who drive escalades and buy beer with their EBT.
 
Whether the Feds or the State, whoever pushed for and allowed comprehensive testing as a benchmark for education needs to be shot. I think you could make the case those are the worst thing to happen to our children's education in the last 50 years.

Any slice of the Dept. of Ed remotely involved in that nonsense needs to be DOGE'ed. Eradicated.
 
Your whole comment only supports the point.

It’s a state problem? Well it’s actually all the states, but I agree. No need for a federal agency, let the states handle it. No need for a federal governance body that spends the vast majority of its money paying administrators.
 
Your whole comment only supports the point.

It’s a state problem? Well it’s actually all the states, but I agree. No need for a federal agency, let the states handle it. No need for a federal governance body that spends the vast majority of its money paying administrators.

I do not at all mind the federal oversight of federally-related/mandated programs and funding; however, there are other departments and agencies that can do that just as easily, much less expensively, and more efficiently. Axe the DoE.

I honestly cannot tell if the decrease (worsening?) of student outcomes was because of the created of the DoE or just a correlation, but I do think that part of the reason of the decrease/worsening of outcomes was because of the move of a lot of state-level oversight to the DoE and the increased federal extortion of the states to receive federal money.
 
Whether the Feds or the State, whoever pushed for and allowed comprehensive testing as a benchmark for education needs to be shot. I think you could make the case those are the worst thing to happen to our children's education in the last 50 years.

Any slice of the Dept. of Ed remotely involved in that nonsense needs to be DOGE'ed. Eradicated.

Standardized testing has been around for a while, but No Child Left Behind really turned it into what we see now.
 
I do not at all mind the federal oversight of federally-related/mandated programs and funding; however, there are other departments and agencies that can do that just as easily, much less expensively, and more efficiently. Axe the DoE.

I honestly cannot tell if the decrease (worsening?) of student outcomes was because of the created of the DoE or just a correlation, but I do think that part of the reason of the decrease/worsening of outcomes was because of the move of a lot of state-level oversight to the DoE and the increased federal extortion of the states to receive federal money.

I think if we look back to various partisan initiatives led by certain administrations has created massive mission creep for what DofEd was built for.

It probably goes back before Bush but you have
  • No Child Left Behind (Bush II)
  • Common Core (Obama)
Common Core 100% led to standards at state level degrading. This was a national effort on standards that also went lower. Now, some of the Common Core framework was good per some of the educators I spoke with when I went back to talk to some of my teachers while I was in college. BUT, like any Federal Mandate the implementation is god awful.

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion...well the foundation of that ended up being Critical Race Theory as we came to understand. Promoting Diversity? Makes sense. Promoting Inclusion? Makes sense. Equity? Uh...Now, I will say something. Maybe it's because Mexicans are considered white. And I appear white.

But my ethnic background has gotten me almost nowhere in life. Yet I've suffered racism from brown and white because I'm a mixed kid. Based on my current job, my loins have also gotten me nowhere. The only thing that has gotten me anywhere is my work ethic.
 
It's been a couple days since the JFK files were released. I haven't been keeping up on things very closely, so I just have one question: Who did it?
This is what Grok summarized. From other things I've seen, it alludes to a group within the CIA, connected to organized crime.
As of March 18, 2025, the U.S. National Archives released a subset of the JFK assassination files under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Act of 1992. Based on the 10 documents available, here’s a summary of the key information and themes:CIA and FBI Operations (1950s–1960s): Several documents detail CIA activities during the early Cold War, including efforts to penetrate the USSR 124-90092-10016 and operations in Europe, such as Berlin and Vienna. William K. Harvey, a prominent CIA figure, is mentioned as Station Chief in Berlin (1952–1959) and Rome (1963–1966), with interviews focusing on his role and knowledge of assassination plots 157-10005-10141. These files highlight extensive CIA travel and technical operations, like the Technical Aids Detachment (TAD) in Frankfurt (1950–1953).Lee Harvey Oswald and Related Investigations: One document references an administrative folder on Lee Harvey Oswald, part of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) materials, dated 1966 124-10369-10022. It includes technical details like a closed-circuit television system installed for the case, but no direct evidence challenging the narrative that Oswald acted alone is present in these specific files.International Figures and Potential Threats: The files mention foreign individuals and potential security concerns, such as Franc Pecar, a Yugoslav trade official reportedly wanting to defect to the U.S. in 1963, with the CIA considering persuading him to return to Yugoslavia 124-90110-10071. Another document references a threatening letter from Joachim Joesten in 1966, alleging a plot against the Johnson administration and mentioning the "Gehlen gang," which was shared with the White House and Secret Service 124-10369-10022.Assassination Plots and Denials: William K. Harvey explicitly denied knowledge of CIA assassination plots against Patrice Lumumba or other foreign leaders (except Fidel Castro) in a 1975 interview 157-10005-10141. This suggests a focus on investigating potential CIA involvement in assassinations, though no direct link to JFK’s assassination is evident in these documents.Redactions and Restrictions: Many documents remain heavily redacted, classified as "Secret," and require CIA approval for full release, indicating ongoing sensitivity around the information e.g., 124-90092-10016, 124-10369-10022. This limits the public’s understanding of the full context.Surprising Details: One intriguing piece is the 1966 letter from Joachim Joesten, which hints at broader conspiracies involving the Johnson administration and a "Gehlen gang" (likely referring to Reinhard Gehlen’s intelligence network, which worked with the CIA) 124-10369-10022. This raises questions about potential international intrigue, though it’s unclear if it relates directly to JFK’s assassination. Additionally, the focus on CIA operations in Europe and Harvey’s denials about assassination plots suggest a deeper examination of the agency’s activities during this period.These files, while providing insight into CIA and FBI activities, do not directly challenge the current belief that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in JFK’s assassination. However, the redactions and references to international figures and potential plots invite speculation about what remains undisclosed in the full 80,000-file collection.
 
Standardized testing has been around for a while, but No Child Left Behind really turned it into what we see now.

What we saw in FL: When I was in school, graduating in 91, we had a standardized test, but it was a "progress report" type of thing. You're in grade x and you're reading at a grade y level. Grades for teachers and students alike were based on...your actual schoolwork.

Maybe it was NCLB, but now FL teachers and schools are graded on Florida's universal test, the FCAT. Teachers openly teach to the FCAT and once that test is over, students start summer break earlier, only in class. Some classes and schools conduct their field trips, watch movies, play games...classwork is secondary to everything else. The FCAT rules supreme.

In IT we have brain dumps where you memorize the test, get a certificate without learning, and move on...but you have the cert that says you know something. That's the FCAT and its ilk: paper certs.

That to go. I don't know crap else about the state of education in America, but those have to go. I know 10 or so teachers from 3rd to 12th grade and several retired principals, and not a single one approves of comprehensive tests like the FCAT.

Those tests need to be a cherry blossom in Japan the first two weeks of August 1945.
 
Back
Top