I don’t care what they do, I do care what they do in my neighborhood.
I don’t care what they do, I do care what they do in my neighborhood.
Laissez-faire exceptionalism, got it.lol. I don’t get worked up about what is happening in other states, or the other side of the country. However it is easy to say, “I don’t want that…” saying that, is not the same as being perpetually outraged over what some idiot does in Portland or NYC.
You see, I haven't moved anywhere except maybe on gun rights and abortion. What has moved has the Democratic party. Anyone who currently brands themselves a centrist may be a 2025 centrist...but I'm a 2005 centrist. A 2025 centrist is a 2005 liberal.Ok, what percentage of your last ballot was Republican?
I disagree with @ThunderHorse on this one, the same as you do, but the question of "how does a democrat centrist vote" is prescient. Democrats (historically, anecdotally, by the numbers, whatever) don't stray from party lines often, even those that consider themselves "centrist".
In my personal experience, people who say they're "centrist" on either side of the aisle still vote down-ballot for their party.
Well, you'll have your shot in '28. Although it's going to be tough- well-known Democratic Centrists Newsom, AOC, and Pete Buttigeg will make that a super tough choice.
A 2025 centrist is a 2005 liberal.
So I guess when it comes to centrists, how are we defining them. Because the spectrum moved, as @Marauder06 likes to say, I never moved. The party did.
I love how far left loons are branding themselves centrists to the point that you're calling them Centrists. Newsom is in a bit of a rebrand, but make no mistake he isn't a centrist at all. Maybe on the Nancy Pelosi/San Francisco scale. But no, none of those people are centrists.
So I guess when it comes to centrists, how are we defining them. Because the spectrum moved, as @Marauder06 likes to say, I never moved. The party did.
Ever see little kids play soccer? Like 4 and 5 year olds? It’s like a tightly packed cluster that moves around the field in a mass, with the ball as a nucleus.
It’s like the Left. They start on a cluster point, a nucleus, like RFK jr., then move quickly in a mass to the next trending outrage: No Kings (ok, he didn’t become a king move on); he’s getting us embroiled in a new Mideast war (ok, he didn’t start a war, let’s move); sending troops to conquer California (oh wait, they didn’t do shit and left after a week); Doge cuts caused Texas floods (oh wait, NWS was fully staffed); quick, let’s go back to RFK jr…
Just an observation.
You do know me!I can't see inside the brain of @amlove21, but he's posted enough that I can pick up he's sarcastically calling them centrist because they're trying to rebrand.
I'm interested to know what policies changed that you've never moved from but the party has.
They're walking it back by saying she meant the whole file was on her desk, not the "client list". Even though that's what she was directly asked about.Didn’t the AG say the client list was on her desk, and she was reviewing it?
They're walking it back by saying she meant the whole file was on her desk, not the "client list". Even though that's what she was directly asked about.
Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me if someone in the "deep state" destroyed it.
They're walking it back by saying she meant the whole file was on her desk, not the "client list". Even though that's what she was directly asked about.
Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me if someone in the "deep state" destroyed it.

I'm interested to know what policies changed that you've never moved from but the party has.
I have gotten to my limit on cope and seethe from everyone on the Epstein issue, both sides.
Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein were both alleged (Maxwell convicted) of raping underage females, Maxwell provided them to a huge list of clients- and now there is no list? Prince Andrew was already outed as being on the list, so what? Was it one name long? Why aren't all the democrats tweeting about the list not coming out? Why aren't we seeing a million influencers paid by the left saying "TRUMP WAS ON IT THAT'S WHY"?
The WH walking back the statement is trash. You said you had a tranche of videos that were "disgusting". We saw the tapes, CDs, and hard drives in the safes. We have had the flight logs for 5 years. The video you put out is missing a minute. You didn't even clean up the time stamps. The memo you put out isn't formatted correctly, it's not signed, and there's no date. Comey's (Mr. 8647) daughter not only "prosecuted" Maxwell, but ALSO Epstein AND Diddy? No one finds that weird? No one? Beuller?
And now the prevailing QAnon (who is back, BTW) theory is that Trump put out intentional misinformation because he in fact DOES have all the information and they let everyone on the non-existent list know what they have and "MuH pAtRiOtS" have leverage over the deep state now?
Fucking miss me. Miss me with all this bullshit. I don't care about the potential harm to humanity when the world learns all their precious celebrities and world leaders are on video diddling kids. I don't care about the impact to the stock markets and the resultant loss of confidence in the ruling class.
Fuck them all. Let it all burn.
It's not coming out, the list doesn't exist in it's original form, they hate us all. That's the take. Moving on.The idea that they've got no evidence is fucking crazy. So Epstein and Maxwell were trafficking kids, but we've got no proof of it? So how were they jailed?
The most likely thing is Patel/Bondi/etc spent years rallying to release the documents, realized it includes too many golden gooses, and they've put money/security over doing the right thing. It's the same reason nobody in the Biden admin released it.
The Q-Anon theory is somehow worse than that. Q thinks we're using child abuse material to blackmail the "deep state"? What the actual fuck, the "patriot" idea is the government is just doing what Epstein did?
I'll be amazed if it leaks while Andrews/Trump/Clinton/other high profile people on the list are still alive.
