I started a
thread for discussing illegal drugs, I had some questions and didn't want to derail this thread.
Since this is an ongoing situation I'm not going to comment directly on this case or what I think should happen to the people involved. I'll also add that I don't know any more than anyone else reading the news and I won't be involved in any of the command decisions that result from the investigation that is going to take place over this incident. I do have some other thoughts though, and I'll probably make a couple of different posts about it.
First: In cases like this, some people tend to jump on the "bash the Academies" bandwagon. Part of that is because this is soooo far out of the norm. There are 4,000+ cadets at West Point, and most of them toe the line most of the time. I've seen the headlines about the 6 (or whatever number it is now) cadets. You know what you're NOT going to see, ever? A headline that reads "3,994 cadets do the right thing 364 days a year." Every organization has its bad actors, including the Special Operations community, who by the way has its own struggles with drug issues. I'd be curious to know if we did a random sample of 4,000 active-duty Soldiers (West Point cadets are active duty and subject to UCMJ) in a similar age demographic (17-27) and counted the annual drug busts per capita, if West Point's would be higher or lower. My sense is that the Academy's rate would be significantly lower. I'll also re-iterate something I've said many times: first reports are almost always wrong, and it's wise to wait for the whole story to come out before racing to extreme recommendations like "shut down West Point!" I do think that there are legitimate arguments for doing away with the Service Academies, but this particular incident, in isolation, probably isn't one of them. .
Second: In general, the "they're just kids" argument doesn't hold up for me. To begin with, West Point cadets are not "kids." With the very limited exception of cadets who enroll while they're still 17, every single one of them is a legal adult, bound by UCMJ. West Point invests an extraordinary amount of time training cadets in character, military discipline, and the bounds of legal and moral behavior. If adults make adult decisions, then they get to live with the adult consequences. Drug abuse is so beyond the pale of acceptable behavior not only at West Point but in the Army that severe consequences are warranted. It calls into question character and decision-making as well as organizational and individual trust, which in turn questions one's ability to serve as an Army officer. You want to "be like other college 'kids'" and do a bunch of drugs in your late teens and early 20s? OK then, but do it somewhere other than West Point. After serving on the Admissions Committee, I can guarantee there are probably 3-5 other fully qualified candidates who could have taken your slot and would probably NOT have ruined it over illegal drugs.
Third: Rules following. I have been in the Army almost 27 years. Over that time I have become more and more tolerant of human failings, which I guess some people would call "less by-the-book." However, I also know that if you let enough little things slide over time, they become big things. The most extreme example is portrayed in the book
Black Hearts, which I encourage all of you to read if you haven't already. I still punish people when they deserve it, but I now do so unemotionally and don't take it personally. We have a lot of rules in our Army, and a lot of people who break them. Not everyone needs their nuts crushed over every little thing. But if you nip the little things in the bud, they don't bloom into a big problem for everyone later. It's a delicate balance.
I have also found that in many cases, leaders don't enforce rules because they are lazy, or they are scared, or they lack the courage to risk disapproval of the people they lead. This isn't always the case, of course. But when I find out a subordinate leader has not been enforcing rules, I look at why. Was it for their troops, or was it for themselves? Did you decide to PT the crap out of your private for breaking curfew instead of reporting him to me for a summarized Article 15 (the CG-directed punishment when I was in 2ID) because you were trying to help the Soldier, or are you trying to sweep it under the rug? Worse yet, are YOU the one coming in late, thinking that the rules don't apply to you? If I can't trust you with little shit, how can I trust you with big issues?
Fourth: I believe in redemption and second chances. I also believe that all of life is developmental, and especially in one's late teens and early 20s. That's why I was very supportive of West Point's move away from an attritional model--especially when it comes to character/moral issues--to a developmental one. But egregious violations of norms and standards, especially when they are widely known, need timely, substantial, and publicly-known punishments. West Point has several sanctions available for major violations, including complete expulsion, "roll back" to a later graduating class (trust me, this is a much bigger deal to cadets than it might seem), to "Army Mentorship," where cadets serve time as a non-promotable spec-4 in an active duty unit. In many of those cases, cadets can re-apply if they choose, and some of those who re-apply are re-admitted. But the punishment has to happen as part of the growth and developmental process. I've had second chances in my life. There are plenty of people on this site who got kicked off and were allowed back with a second chance and reintegrated just fine. Others went right back to their old ways and were kicked off a second, permanent time. Same things with West Point cadets.
Fifth (and this will be the last thought for this post): the argument that "everyone does it" or "what did you do when you were young" doesn't hold water. No, not everyone does illegal drugs. Yes, everyone at West Point knows that doing illegal drugs, even once, will probably get you punted. If they do that anyway, it's on them. And there are probably a thousand West Point cadets, and tens of thousands of other college students who graduate every year in the US, who manage to go their entire college careers without taking drugs. I did. One of the main reasons I did was because I knew if I didn't stay drug-free, that would affect my ability to stay in school and to join the Army. Other people have different opinions and made different choices. Again, now that I'm older I understand it better, but as I believe in redemption and second changes and are more tolerant of all types of failure in both others and myself, I also believe in agency and accountability. If you do it, you live with the consequences.