Your 2022 Relieved Naval Commander Thread

Teufel

Force Recon
Verified SOF
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
4,489
Location
Tun Tavern
Navy Orders High-Level Outside Investigation of SEAL Course

It looks like CAPT Geary was quietly replaced in May

"
Navy Orders High-Level Outside Investigation of SEAL Course

The punishing selection course for the Navy’s most elite force has come under new scrutiny after a sailor’s death exposed illicit drug use and other problems.
Sept. 9, 2022, 6:39 p.m. ET

The Navy has started an independent investigation of the brutal selection course for its elite SEALs after a sailor’s death this year revealed a tangle of physical abuse, poor medical oversight and use of performance-enhancing drugs in the course.
The order for the new investigation came from the highest levels of the Navy — the outgoing vice chief of naval operations, Adm. William K. Lescher. It was given to a rear admiral from outside the SEALs, signaling that the Navy had given it high priority and wanted it to be independent.
Admiral Lescher issued the order in a letter obtained by The New York Times. The letter is dated the day after The New York Times reported that the sailor’s death had exposed a number of problems at the harrowing selection course, known as Basic Underwater Demolition/SEALs, or BUD/S for short.

Among the problems were a damaging ethos of forced suffering that often dismissed serious injuries and illnesses as weakness and a growing subculture of students who saw illicit performance-enhancing drugs as the only way to get through the course.

Admiral Lescher’s letter ordered investigators to focus on a broad swath of issues in the course, including its safety measures, the qualifications of instructors and medical personnel and its drug testing policies for students. It also asked what, if anything, had changed at the course since February, when a 24-year-old former elite college athlete, Kyle Mullen, died hours after completing its most punishing phase. The vice chief gave investigators 30 days to report their findings.

The Naval Special Warfare Command, which includes the SEALs, had been looking into Seaman Mullen’s death and the surrounding issues on its own, and its findings were supposed to have been released in August. But they were held back after top Navy leaders indicated that they thought the report placed too much blame on the sailor and not enough on failures in the SEALs, according to a Navy official who is familiar with discussions about the report. The official asked not to be identified by name because he was not authorized to comment on an unreleased report.

The vice chief’s letter now directs the Special Warfare Command to stick to a very narrow inquiry into whether Seaman Mullen’s death occurred in the line of duty and to leave the larger questions to the outside investigators.

Asked about the admiral’s decision to start the new investigation, a Navy spokesman issued a statement saying that “the Navy remains committed to transparency and ensuring the final reports are thorough, accurate, impartial, and that confidence and credibility are maintained throughout the entire process.”

The BUD/S course takes place on the gritty beach sand and in the cold ocean waters of Naval Amphibious Base Coronado near San Diego. It has a reputation as the most physically grueling selection course in the military. Candidates endure weeks of carrying heavy logs and inflatable boats, lengthy sessions of situps and pull-ups in frigid surf, “drown-proofing” exercises underwater with bound hands, and days and nights spent cold, wet, sandy and exhausted.

The SEALs say they need that kind of unforgiving rite of passage to select the rare individuals who can perform some of the military’s most challenging missions. Few sailors who attempt the course complete it — over the past 20 years, an average of just one in four — and the proportion has been shrinking.

According to Navy data, the average passing rate plunged suddenly in February 2021 to about half of what it typically had been in prior years. Since then, in some classes, only 7 percent of sailors have made it through. Several SEALs and BUD/S candidates said that the course had recently become even harder and that warnings to commanders about dangerous changes had largely gone unheeded.

The drop roughly coincided with the arrival of a new command team led by Capt. Bradley Geary, a decorated officer who served for a time in the SEALs’ most elite and secretive counterterrorism unit, known to the public as SEAL Team Six but referred to by SEALs as DevGru.
In December, the Navy gave Captain Geary an award for outstanding leadership in a previous command assignment. His acceptance speech included a quotation from Francis Bacon: “Prosperity doth best discover vice, but adversity doth best discover virtue.”
While Captain Geary was in charge, several changes were made at BUD/S, according to four current and former Navy personnel with knowledge of operations there. They asked not to be named because they feared retaliation from the tight-knit SEAL community.

A key change, they said, was removing a number of senior civilian advisers — all of them retired SEALs — whose job had been to watch over training, guide young instructors and step in if they saw unnecessary abuse or alarming medical problems. The instructor staff was packed with men recently moved from DevGru, and instructors were given greater leeway to run classes as they saw fit, three of the Navy personnel said. With few civilian advisers around, they said, the leash was effectively off. Captain Geary, who SEALs say is respected in their community, was transferred from command of BUD/S shortly after Seaman Mullen died. He did not respond to several requests for comment.

Five sailors who were BUD/S students in 2021 or 2022 described a savage intensity that few SEALs before them had seen. The sailors asked not to be identified because they feared retaliation. They said instructors had hit, kicked and otherwise abused students and had often devised ways to try to drive them to quit. Each BUD/S class is assigned a proctor — a SEAL instructor whose job is to be an ally and mentor for the students. But several of the sailors said their proctor would use his nightly mentoring sessions to inflict more punishment, having students run for miles in the dark and plunge repeatedly into the ocean.

Injured BUD/S students were called weaklings and quitters, and at times they were punished for seeking help. Medical personnel often stood by silently, or in some cases participated in the abuse, the sailors said. Students were often allowed only two or three hours of sleep a night in the first weeks of the course, they said, even though their days were jammed with extreme physical toil. Exhausted immune systems broke down. Diarrhea, vomiting and pneumonia became common, but the sailors said students had tried to hide symptoms from instructors who seemed to target the injured.

One man who entered BUD/S in 2021 said he had gone to instructors at 5 a.m. one day with a painfully swollen leg, telling them that he believed it was broken and that he needed to see the medical staff. He said instructors had responded that the medical clinic did not open until 7 a.m. and had then ordered him to wait the two hours in the cold Pacific surf while the rest of the class was ordered to chant his name and tell him to quit. Medical personnel stood watching for an hour before pulling him from the water with hypothermia, he said. Medical documents show that he ended up in the hospital, where he had to have surgery to remove a flesh-eating infection.

SEALs who went through BUD/S years ago said they had never experienced that kind of abuse. A retired SEAL whose son recently tried to complete BUD/S said in an interview that when he had seen his son two weeks into the course, the young sailor was so swollen and covered with abrasions that he looked as if he had been in a motorcycle wreck. The father secretly got his son to a civilian doctor to get help without attracting the ire of instructors, he said. The son dropped out in the third week from exhaustion and injuries. The retired SEAL said when he had qualified in the 1990s, BUD/S was hard, but the focus had been largely about learning teamwork and mental toughness. What his son experienced, he said, was more like “Lord of the Flies.” The parent asked to be anonymous to protect his son, who is still in the Navy.

Four of the recent BUD/S candidates said that sailors had been using drugs to get through the course and that when instructors had briefed their classes on drug use, the emphasis was on not getting caught. Parents, former SEALs and other Navy employees said in interviews that they had reached out to the SEAL chain of command, warning about dangerous conditions. The Navy official with knowledge of the investigative report said some changes had been made at BUD/S in response to those warnings, allowing students more sleep and dialing back the hardest parts of the course.

It was not enough to prevent a death. The pace at BUD/S did not relent even after Seaman Mullen died in February. The next class passed even fewer students, and a number of sailors dropped out because of infections or broken bones.
The Navy official said that a number of instructors had been moved out of BUD/S training since February but that none had received any official punishment. Many are still instructors in later stages of SEAL training, he said."
 

pardus

Verified Military
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
10,171
If those allegations are true, it's an absolute fucking disgrace that the SEAL community should be ashamed of. Personally I think that mentality is pathetic, "It needs to be this tough/abusive etc... because of our mission set" Really? Does any other non third world country SOF unit act like that in training? The results of the investigation will be interesting.
 

Ooh-Rah

Semper-Fi
Verified Military
Joined
Sep 12, 2012
Messages
11,162
If those allegations are true, it's an absolute fucking disgrace that the SEAL community should be ashamed of. Personally I think that mentality is pathetic, "It needs to be this tough/abusive etc... because of our mission set" Really? Does any other non third world country SOF unit act like that in training? The results of the investigation will be interesting.
Thank you for so perfectly articulating what I have been trying to write over and over for about the last 20 minutes.
 

Cookie_

SOF Support
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
1,007
If those allegations are true, it's an absolute fucking disgrace that the SEAL community should be ashamed of. Personally I think that mentality is pathetic, "It needs to be this tough/abusive etc... because of our mission set" Really? Does any other non third world country SOF unit act like that in training? The results of the investigation will be interesting.
Even third world countries aren't that bad. Fuck, the Chinese don't treat their dudes that bad.

Most comparable I can think of are thai/filipino(not sure which) troops being kicked, but even then that pales in comparison.
 

DasBoot

Ranger
Verified SOF
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
1,535
Even third world countries aren't that bad. Fuck, the Chinese don't treat their dudes that bad.

Most comparable I can think of are thai/filipino(not sure which) troops being kicked, but even then that pales in comparison.
There is a point of suffering where people who won’t quit, just won’t quit. Now there is a level where people start getting hurt and have to factor in long term, permanent damage. It seems the BUD/S cadre found a way to make the no quitters finally quit… which is disgraceful.
 

AWP

Formerly Known as Freefalling
SOF Support
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
16,420
Location
Not Afghanistan
I keep typing a response, over several days, so I'll just trim it to this:

Matthew Cole's book, and allegations against DEVGRU, are allegedly false according to some. Fine, I understand. We've covered that elsewhere.

Here we are, SEAL on SEAL (trainee) violence with a strong DEVGRU connection, but Cole's book is bullshit? I guess once you kill a Green Beret and try to cover that up, a SEAL trainee is nothing. Shit on an American who gave his life to save others in order to protect your command's reputation and deny that hero his due for the nation's highest award? Some lowly trainee doesn't stand a chance.

If this were a biker gang or something, the Feds would prefer RICO charges on the organization...
 

JedisonsDad

Verified SOF
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
290
Location
Florida
What surprises me is that it’s supposedly the lack of contractor oversight that led to this. In my experience, it was the contractors acting as the gate keepers, going on and on about “back in my day”.
 

Devildoc

Verified Military
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
5,140
Location
Durham, NC
I keep typing a response, over several days, so I'll just trim it to this:

Matthew Cole's book, and allegations against DEVGRU, are allegedly false according to some. Fine, I understand. We've covered that elsewhere.

Here we are, SEAL on SEAL (trainee) violence with a strong DEVGRU connection, but Cole's book is bullshit? I guess once you kill a Green Beret and try to cover that up, a SEAL trainee is nothing. Shit on an American who gave his life to save others in order to protect your command's reputation and deny that hero his due for the nation's highest award? Some lowly trainee doesn't stand a chance.

If this were a biker gang or something, the Feds would prefer RICO charges on the organization...

Maybe it needs to be the 35th thing (or whatever) for them to finally notice, "hey, there's a pattern here...." :rolleyes:
 

DA SWO

SOWT
Verified SOF
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
9,686
Location
San Antonio Texas
The War Horse identified at least 29 relieved Air Force commanders during this investigation. Two lieutenant colonels were fired for hazing. Two major generals were fired, one for an unprofessional relationship and the other for unspecified allegations of misconduct. A third major general, the service’s highest-ranking female fighter pilot, was fired for fostering a “toxic” unit climate. One of them, a brigadier general who was relieved for allegedly abusing her position of authority at the Air Force Academy, now serves as the chief of staff for the Space Force.

I know the female MG who was fired, she was being prepped for her third star. She commanded the NATO AWACS wing, and some misconduct emerged once the Pentagon based investigation started. Essentially having subordinates do personal chores while she attended meetings. She ran the SAP Program Office and apparently turned into a screaming banshee, SES level individual asked SecAF to remove her. (This is all public and easy to find, MG Dawn Dunlap).

The BG at the Academy is a real piece of work, TDY funds forr personal travel, blamed her staff. But hey, if your a lesbian it's all good, we'll give you another job so you can keep your star (this came out and is fairly easy to find).
 

ThunderHorse

Verified Military
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
4,941
Location
The Big D
What surprises me is that it’s supposedly the lack of contractor oversight that led to this. In my experience, it was the contractors acting as the gate keepers, going on and on about “back in my day”.

This is interesting, I knew a guy who helped start a big vetbro clothingcompany. He obviously sold his piece and started other businesses. Those businesses were just a side hustle until pre-pandemic. He was a contract BUD/S instructor. I had no idea that Navy used contractors as instructors until he "retired" from being a contractor.
 
Top