Your 2024 Presidential Election Thread

This whole situation would end if the West quit funding both sides of the conflict. Cut off financial and political support to Gaza (including and especially UNRWA) and the conflict would quickly come to an end.

We need to quit giving money to people who hate us.
Likewise, cut funding until the hostages are released.
The current administration really doesn't care.
 
That clip of Walz walking away from the question after clearly hearing it and panicking is terrible.

China Tim did not look like he was having a good time. Also- holy CRAP is his record with the Chinese real, real bad.

Look into that one if you have the time.
 
This whole situation would end if the West quit funding both sides of the conflict. Cut off financial and political support to Gaza (including and especially UNRWA) and the conflict would quickly come to an end.

We need to quit giving money to people who hate us.

We give Israel a few billion a year before the conflict, plus all the military aid since, and anywhere from a few hundred million to about $1B a year to many of their neighbors.

I don't know what the eventual cost of taking aid from all sides would be, but we do get some leverage from that money. Without the influence in place there would be a giant war in the region within a few years with Israel kicking a lot of ass again and taking more ME territory. Imagine them destroying Lebanon, and Palestinian territories using bombs bought from Russia or China.
 
This:

Is in no material way this:
this administration has basically held Israel back from doing what was needed to finish this?

Before we even go into the fact that Israel is more than capable of creating its own guided bombs, the paused munitions in question have been in production for decades, and doubtlessly stockpiled by Israel up until this.

The weapons delivery pause was a symbolic gesture aimed to boost President Biden's image among his younger base, which failed solidly given Israel's undeterred invasion of Rafah and his same-week announcement of a separate $1b weapons package to Israel.
 
We give Israel a few billion a year before the conflict, plus all the military aid since, and anywhere from a few hundred million to about $1B a year to many of their neighbors.

I don't know what the eventual cost of taking aid from all sides would be, but we do get some leverage from that money. Without the influence in place there would be a giant war in the region within a few years with Israel kicking a lot of ass again and taking more ME territory. Imagine them destroying Lebanon, and Palestinian territories using bombs bought from Russia or China.
The first bolded part: I don't like that either, especially since it's largely a kickback scheme. Much of the money we give them has to be spent on US materiel which is conveniently made in... the districts of the people doing the approving. And if not that, their constiuents are uber-Israel supporters who want us to give $$$ to Israel. And, to be honest, I'm not sure how much they really need it. Israel's economy is chugging along pretty well (see Startup Nation). I think the only country in the region with higher GDP is Qatar or Bahrain or something. They'd probably be doing pretty well without billions from us every year.

Second bolded part: what leverage, exactly, are we getting for funding Fatah and Hamas? Hamas is at war with the same country that we're giving billions of dollars a year to, and have been for decades. They are existential, zero-sum enemies. Just this past year they carried out a 9/11 style attack against Israel, arguably our best ally in the region. Fatah is not as bad, but only because they're not as strong. They regularly pay terrorists and/or their families for terror attacks carried out against or in Israel, including against Americans (see the Taylor Force Act) .https://havokjournal.com/politics/international/three-reasons-palestinian-pay-slay-stay/

I'm all about paying people to support our interests, but when they're acting directly against those interests, we either need to do something immediate and meaningful about it, or cease our support.

If we really want meaningful peace between Israel and the Palestinians, the world needs to stop crying over a "ceasefire" and let the two groups sort our a permanent solution in which one side wins. Only then will there be peace.
 
The first bolded part: I don't like that either, especially since it's largely a kickback scheme. Much of the money we give them has to be spent on US materiel which is conveniently made in... the districts of the people doing the approving. And if not that, their constiuents are uber-Israel supporters who want us to give $$$ to Israel. And, to be honest, I'm not sure how much they really need it. Israel's economy is chugging along pretty well (see Startup Nation). I think the only country in the region with higher GDP is Qatar or Bahrain or something. They'd probably be doing pretty well without billions from us every year.

Second bolded part: what leverage, exactly, are we getting for funding Fatah and Hamas? Hamas is at war with the same country that we're giving billions of dollars a year to, and have been for decades. They are existential, zero-sum enemies. Just this past year they carried out a 9/11 style attack against Israel, arguably our best ally in the region. Fatah is not as bad, but only because they're not as strong. They regularly pay terrorists and/or their families for terror attacks carried out against or in Israel, including against Americans (see the Taylor Force Act) .https://havokjournal.com/politics/international/three-reasons-palestinian-pay-slay-stay/

I'm all about paying people to support our interests, but when they're acting directly against those interests, we either need to do something immediate and meaningful about it, or cease our support.

If we really want meaningful peace between Israel and the Palestinians, the world needs to stop crying over a "ceasefire" and let the two groups sort our a permanent solution in which one side wins. Only then will there be peace.
We seem to like funding both sides...we fund Israel to deter Iran...we fund the PLO, and then Hamas does Hamas things. Manufactures rockets out of pipes. Etc. So, why do we fund the PLO? Fund Israel and only Israel or fund no one.
 
..

Second bolded part: what leverage, exactly, are we getting for funding Fatah and Hamas? Hamas is at war with the same country that we're giving billions of dollars a year to, and have been for decades. They are existential, zero-sum enemies...

I'm all about paying people to support our interests, but when they're acting directly against those interests, we either need to do something immediate and meaningful about it, or cease our support...

My best guess is, that at the top levels of intelligence and strategic planning, the idea of giving up aid to all sides would result in the obvious war, laying waste to the region for a while. Energy costs would spike. Every $10 increase in the price of a barrel of oil costs American consumers about $200m/day. We are cruising along around $70-80/barrel with Houthis and Ukraine going on. I couldn't imagine what it would be when shit goes haywire in the ME, but we get the point.

A huge war would also cause chaos with the resulting refugees and that would endanger our other more "useful" allies in the region.

I read the article you linked. I knew about the posters and paintings of "martyrs" but never the financial incentives. Holy shit, $39 grand/yr and a possible job, that's a lot of scratch.
 
My best guess is, that at the top levels of intelligence and strategic planning, the idea of giving up aid to all sides would result in the obvious war, laying waste to the region for a while. Energy costs would spike. Every $10 increase in the price of a barrel of oil costs American consumers about $200m/day. We are cruising along around $70-80/barrel with Houthis and Ukraine going on. I couldn't imagine what it would be when shit goes haywire in the ME, but we get the point.

A huge war would also cause chaos with the resulting refugees and that would endanger our other more "useful" allies in the region.

I read the article you linked. I knew about the posters and paintings of "martyrs" but never the financial incentives. Holy shit, $39 grand/yr and a possible job, that's a lot of scratch.
I'm pretty sure you previously read "Give War a Chance" but for those who haven't, here's a related post: With Gaza, Maybe We Need To Just "Give War a Chance" • The Havok Journal

Our money, and our policies, are a large part of what's fueling the fighting in the Middle East. Given Iran a ton of money was a huge mistake, and they used it to attack us and our allies and our interests. Giving money to Gaza and Hamas (wait, they're more or less the same thing) is a huge mistake, and they use it to attack us and our allies and our interests.

If our money isn't buying the desired results, we should stop giving it out. And if they're using it to harm us... then we should make them pay.
 
"Good guys, bad guys, made-up words. Let's see who formerly owned this gorgeous hunk-uh. Ah, this guy was an arms dealer. Made his bank selling weapons to the bad guys. Oh… And the good."
―DJ, from Star Wars: The Last Jedi
 
So the new vet left narrative is to not thank them for their service if voting for Trump.

I didn't know thanking someone for being selfless was conditional. That's not being selfless, in fact that's being selfish.

It's part of the Left's ongoing criminalization of Republicans. If you're not one of them, you should be in jail.
 
Back
Top