Your 2024 Presidential Election Thread

C
R.Caerbannog said:
I'm a tinfoil hat wearing rabbit Box. It's been years since I've been to Sharky's or Secrets. I don't know what names strippers have now. O_o:ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...

I'm going to have to stop you RIGHT there...
You don't have to be a "regular" at a place that has a shitty pizza lunch buffet, an elevated walkway right through the middle of the room, and a bunch of brass poles bolted to the floor. You know in your heart that certain names are going to be uttered over and over and over and over and over
and over and over
and over
...when the DJ says, "Ok out there put your hands together for our next dancer coming to the stage next, we have the lovely.....
.....Brandi, Heather, Channing, Briana, Amber, Sabrina, Melody, Dakota, Sierra, Vandi, Crystal, Samantha, Autumn, Ruby, Taylor, Tara, Tammy, Laura, Shelly, Shantelle, Courtney, Misty, Jenny, Christa, Mindy, Noel, Shelby, Trina, Reba, Cassandra, Nicki, Kelsy, Shauna, Jolene, Earlie, Claudia, Savannah, Cassie, Dolly, Kendra, Callie, Chloe, Devon, Emmylou"

It could be any one of those names with a ‘Lynn’ after it and it wouldn't make a difference - or of course, the aforementioned, "Cinnamon"

Don't play dumb - when you hear the DJ announce that one of those girls is coming to the stage, somebody is about to be topless...
...and you know it.
...and somewhere is an old rich guy that is going to try and sniff her fucking hair.
 
Last edited:
Gunz said:
BITD after the war in J-ville I “dated” a stripper whose stage name was Little Orphan Annie. She worked at the Playland Bar on Court St. They weren’t really strippers, they were go-go dancers in bikinis. This was during my drinking phase at 2nd MarDiv.

IIRC, once while we were screwing in the men’s room, she told me she was taking advantage of the US people by manipulating its governmental systems.
Click to expand...
Was she an ex Soviet gal or 'political refugee' trying to get a green card? I hear they can cook!

Look at what happened to Minnesota and it's elected representatives. Who would've guessed that we'd get a Somali elected to congress, who then talks shit about the country, who's constituents take every handout they can get. Who's pocket is getting picked and is the diversity worth the extra crime, violence, and death these people bring?

Someone brought those people to Minnesota. Got them hooked into the system and then gave them political power to reshape that part of the US.
 
That someone was the State Department and its associated liberal VOLAGs who facilitated the influx of Somali refugees.

Where you see a nefarious master plan designed by some consortium of conspirators, I see business as usual by a variety bleeding heart liberals and socialists who think they can save the planet at any cost and ruin conservative opposition in the process.
 
Last edited:
Gunz said:
That someone was the State Department and its associated liberal VOLAGs who facilitated the influx of Somali refugees.

Where you see a nefarious master plan designed by some consortium of conspirators, I see business as usual by a variety bleeding heart liberals and socialists who think they can save the planet at any cost and ruin conservative opposition in the process.
Click to expand...
I agree with you on the business as usual by liberals and commies. That said, don't you find it odd that the same thing has happened in Britain with the Paki's, Canada with the Indian's and Chicoms, or Germany & the EU with the North African's? Everything from the uprooting of native populations, the refusal to assimilate, the political and cultural damage wrought by the new arrivals, has played out all over the West.

Hell, the current invasion has UN support groups based out of the old USSOUTHCOM buildings in Panama. These groups are going by a plan, they're getting funding, political cover, and media top cover from somewhere. Stuff like this doesn't happen organically.

One is coincidence, twice is happenstance, three times is enemy action.
 
After the recent speech in Vegas - it has become clear that not only are we no longer serious about being American - we aren't even serious about being sentient beings - but hey - dont take my word for it - I'm just a narrow minded partisan that believes in ageism...
uNTIL nEXT tIME.JPG
 
They say life imitates art...

When Montgomery Brewster spearheaded his "None of the Above" campaign for mayor of New York City - who would have thought that such a beloved, well advertised, and TOTALLY more popular candidate than Donald Trump according to her campaign commercials would have finished second by 30 percentage points on a "None of the Above" primary vote...

...stay tuned for the next episode of everyones favorite reality TV show, "Election Season"
 
Trump's SCOTUS hearing going on now. Some outlets are livestreaming.

I cannot imagine SCOTUS voting that state's can bar him on the ballot based on the 14th amendment when he has not been charged or tried for those allegation. I also not the irony that Colorado, et al., are trying to nail him on the 14th amendment when they are violating the 14th amendment (due process).
 
Devildoc said:
Trump's SCOTUS hearing going on now. Some outlets are livestreaming.

I cannot imagine SCOTUS voting that state's can bar him on the ballot based on the 14th amendment when he has not been charged or tried for those allegation. I also not the irony that Colorado, et al., are trying to nail him on the 14th amendment when they are violating the 14th amendment (due process).
Click to expand...

The Colorado claim isn't going to pass the Supreme Court. The ruling will likely find that the insurrection ban (which doesn't require conviction btw) is only applicable to those running in state races, I.E. Congressional seats.

It'll find that banning Presidential candidates requires a stronger bar, but will probably leave the specifics of that for Congress to create a framework for.

There is the argument that because insurrection wasn't a legally defined crime prior to the 14th Ammendment that after insurrection was criminalized it now requires a conviction, and I could see the court going that route as well.

ETA: I feel like this is one of those cases where it's known the legal framework is shakey, but it was pushed more to establish precedent than actually win its argument.
 
Cookie_ said:
The Colorado claim isn't going to pass the Supreme Court. The ruling will likely find that the insurrection ban (which doesn't require conviction btw) is only applicable to those running in state races, I.E. Congressional seats.

It'll find that banning Presidential candidates requires a stronger bar, but will probably leave the specifics of that for Congress to create a framework for.

There is the argument that because insurrection wasn't a legally defined crime prior to the 14th Ammendment that after insurrection was criminalized it now requires a conviction, and I could see the court going that route as well.
Click to expand...

Yeah, agreed. Colorado's case has more holes than my son's underwear.

Court adjourned until next Friday at 10. None of the justices seemed to buy Colorado's case, and Trump's attorney did a pretty decent job at highlighting Colorado's legal inconsistencies and attacking its conclusions.
 
Cookie_ said:
ETA: I feel like this is one of those cases where it's known the legal framework is shakey, but it was pushed more to establish precedent than actually win its argument.
Click to expand...

…And to win retention votes from their liberal, Trump-hating constituents. Colorado SC justices serve terms, like most other states. They are political animals just towing the line.
 
Cookie_ said:
ETA: I feel like this is one of those cases where it's known the legal framework is shakey, but it was pushed more to establish precedent than actually win its argument.
Click to expand...

If SCOTUS shuts them down, so much for precedent. I don't think any other state will attempt to try it. But maybe. I have been wrong before. But I absolutely buy the argument that they knew or felt it wasn't going to survive SCOTUS muster and that this was a "statement."

Gunz said:
…And to win retention votes from their liberal, Trump-hating constituents. Colorado SC justices serve terms, like most other states. They are political animals just towing the line.
Click to expand...

In NC justices serve 8 year terms, and are voted.
 

Similar threads

AWP
Your Weekend Safety Brief
Replies
7
Views
1K
Mad boomer
Mad boomer
Marauder06
Combined/Joint SOF Panel at West Point--Your Thoughts?
Replies
5
Views
3K
Gunz
Gunz
Ooh-Rah
Enlistment to SOF - The ShadowSpear Way
Replies
1
Views
3K
Ooh-Rah
Ooh-Rah
Failure404
Moral Autonomy and the Ethics of War
2
Replies
21
Views
3K
TYW27
TYW27
Haldex
MOS Choice - Setting up to Prepare
Replies
17
Views
10K
Arrowhead_FS85
A
Back
Top