Covid-19

A friend of mine, former co-worker, recently retired from the FBI. He said that an estimated 30% of Chinese nationals at our local university were actively engaged in academic espionage and other intelligence related activities.
Yep, that tracks. Even now, they won't admit Covid was released by their govt. Whenever anyone gets sick from another covid strain they blame the weather. They legit don't belong here.
 
Are you saying you don’t buy long Covid?

I’ve got an aunt and very good friend who would probably disagree with you.

Correct I don't. See Devildoc's response. But the point is that I had to hear it 5 times this morning before my provider showed up. It comes off as government pushing a narrative. "Are you sure you don't have this? Maybe you do, please call"
 
Maybe Long COVID is a thing, maybe it isn't, but we've been lied to for so many years that our skepticism and scorn are warranted. Maybe people aren't conspiracy theorists, maybe they were lied to for so long and so often they won't immediately buy your bullshit?

I'm probably full of shit and should go to bed.
 
<---- Not A Doctor

Some people can go YEARS without getting bronchitis - then - BAM - they get a nasty case of acute bronchitis.
...then it goes away.

Some people seem a little more prone to coming down with "a little bronchitis" almost every year. It seems to hit them a little harder...
...same strain of the same disease - it just fucks the them up worser for longer

But it isn't "long bronchitis"
(Not A Doctor)

Others have chronic bronchitis which IS long term disease process - but it has never been referred to as "long bronchitis" - at least not during the 16 years I spent as an 18D/NREMTP
Many of these same folks with chronic bronchitis are more susceptible to upper respiratory infections which often turns into recurring bouts of acute bronchitis that have the same worser for longer symptoms...
...still never heard it called "long bronchitis"
(Not A Doctor)

COVID - as we have seen - was a "flu like process" waaay back when it was almost illegal to call it the flu.
It did in fact - kill some folks.
Just like the regular flu kills folks.
Just like pneumonia kills folks.
Just like fucking shellfish allergies kills folks.
(Not A Doctor)

Others - even those godless vaccine deniers that refused to get the jab - seem to float through the hot zone without so much as a trace of the 'Rona...
-Short 'Rona
-Medium 'Rona
-Long 'Rona
Nothing - nil - nada
...and these people are terrible people that the POTUS said where going to kill us all - "For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death" - is what I believe he said.
(Not A Doctor)

I've never heard of "long anything" until people stopped being terrified of COVID. THAT is when "long" COVID seems to have popped up.
Not chronic COVID - not persistent COVID
LONG COVID
...and then tons of people got scared again - because just when they thought COVID was just another "viral syndrome" and they could sleep easy again - NOOOOO - long COVID is going to get us all
It's almost like "LONG" as an adjective when applied to COVID was more of a messaging diagnosis and less of an actual medically diagnosable condition.
(Not A Doctor)

...and now, isn't the CDC even saying "we the people" should just treat COVID like the flu?

Trust the science?
Trust your Doctors?
Not like I used to - not after I realized that legions of doctors willingly and zealously politiczed their oath while remaining silent about things like any possibility that "horse dewormers" might (or might not be) impactful when used to fight "the virus"


Long COVID ?
Sure - why not
 
Last edited:
<---- Not A Doctor

Some people can go YEARS without getting bronchitis - then - BAM - they get a nasty case of acute bronchitis.
...then it goes away.

Some people seem a little more prone to coming down with "a little bronchitis" almost every year. It seems to hit them a little harder...
...same strain of the same disease - it just fucks the them up worser for longer

But it isn't "long bronchitis"
(Not A Doctor)

Others have chronic bronchitis which IS long term disease process - but it has never been referred to as "long bronchitis" - at least not during the 16 years I spent as an 18D/NREMTP
Many of these same folks with chronic bronchitis are more susceptible to upper respiratory infections which often turns into recurring bouts of acute bronchitis that have the same worser for longer symptoms...
...still never heard it called "long bronchitis"
(Not A Doctor)

COVID - as we have seen - was a "flu like process" waaay back when it was almost illegal to call it the flu.
It did in fact - kill some folks.
Just like the regular flu kills folks.
Just like pneumonia kills folks.
Just like fucking shellfish allergies kills folks.
(Not A Doctor)

Others - even those godless vaccine deniers that refused to get the jab - seem to float through the hot zone without so much as a trace of the 'Rona...
-Short 'Rona
-Medium 'Rona
-Long 'Rona
Nothing - nil - nada
...and these people are terrible people that the POTUS said where going to kill us all - "For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death" - is what I believe he said.
(Not A Doctor)

I've never heard of "long anything" until people stopped being terrified of COVID. THAT is when "long" COVID seems to have popped up.
Not chronic COVID - not persistent COVID
LONG COVID
...and then tons of people got scared again - because just when they thought COVID was just another "viral syndrome" and they could sleep easy again - NOOOOO - long COVID is going to get us all
It's almost like "LONG" as an adjective when applied to COVID was more of a messaging diagnosis and less of an actual medically diagnosable condition.
(Not A Doctor)

...and now, isn't the CDC even saying "we the people" should just treat COVID like the flu?

Trust the science?
Trust your Doctors?
Not like I used to - not after I realized that legions of doctors willingly and zealously politiczed their oath while remaining silent about things like any possibility that "horse dewormers" might (or might not be) impactful when used to fight "the virus"


Long COVID ?
Sure - why not

"Long" COVID is it contrived name for a type post-inflammation syndrome. You can get that with other things, but not with bronchitis. Probably a better example would be exacerbated asthma with someone who has a history of it. But there are other ailments as well. There are other things to it. But it's a catch all name for a difficult to pin down disease process.
 
That's the only point I was trying to make - it is a contrived name - a catch all.

I know quite well that the syndrome can exist with numerous disease processes - but during my time as a health care provider those processes were just referred to as "persistent" - and "persistent" was never used to bash people over the head. But again...
(Not A Doctor)

My real problem with "long" anything - is how quickly what would have normally been clearly messaged as a "catch all" phrase - was oddly messaged as some extra scary variant of something that was little more than a persistent case of any number of "flu like" disease processes.
 
That's the only point I was trying to make - it is a contrived name - a catch all.

I know quite well that the syndrome can exist with numerous disease processes - but during my time as a health care provider those processes were just referred to as "persistent" - and "persistent" was never used to bash people over the head. But again...
(Not A Doctor)

My real problem with "long" anything - is how quickly what would have normally been clearly messaged as a "catch all" phrase - was oddly messaged as some extra scary variant of something that was little more than a persistent case of any number of "flu like" disease processes.

Totally agree re: messaging and name. I think in the beginning it was called that because they thought it was 'just' persistent COVID and didn't know what to call it, but was very misleading: you don't call a flu that lasts months persistent flu because no flu lasts that long. It's something totally different. It was not just lazy and misleading, it was intellectually dishonest.

It's not really a persistence of disease but instead a constellation of weird complications from that disease. And you know that "syndrome" is medical-speak for "we don't know what the fuck is going on." I think providers have done a horrible job of trying to educate to the whole thing, and they deserve the distrust and apprehension they've earned.
 
Not chronic COVID - not persistent COVID
LONG COVID

I always assumed that "long" was chosen due to the ease of spelling the word. Compared to chronic or persistent or any other word longer than four letters. Most people are, well, not the brightest. And, you want them to post about it, so you better make it easy for them to spell.
 
That's the only point I was trying to make - it is a contrived name - a catch all.

I know quite well that the syndrome can exist with numerous disease processes - but during my time as a health care provider those processes were just referred to as "persistent" - and "persistent" was never used to bash people over the head. But again...
(Not A Doctor)

My real problem with "long" anything - is how quickly what would have normally been clearly messaged as a "catch all" phrase - was oddly messaged as some extra scary variant of something that was little more than a persistent case of any number of "flu like" disease processes.

Will you write my manifesto bro?
 
It wont be so much "forgotten" as it will be downright memory-holed.

Then, they will publicly declare any "memories" of what they did as "misinformation" - at the threat of a visit from the Bureau of Disinformation and their neuralyzer - the one that shadow bans all of your controversial social media posts.

Forget that even the CDC is now saying "treat it like flu" and that even the most hardcore members of the Holy Church of Saint Fauci are now saying things like - "is it possible that the vaccine might have something to do with all of these agressvie cancers popping up in the young and otherwise very low threat demographics all over the world?"

For fuck sake - I just got a fucking email the other day talking about "cancer studies"
...yes, cANceR $tUd1eS
-and at a time when folks are JUST NOW starting to say that MAYBE
juuuust MAYBE -this experimental vaccine that does NOT prevent anything and does not result in immunity could be a factor in this oddly coincidental spike of aggressive cancers popping up in the young and otherwise very low threat demographics around the world

30 Years in the Army - the remnants of agent orange in Vietnamveterans - gulf war disease - open burn pits - even poison water at Camp Lejune - but I have never seen anything quite like this oddly timed email I saw the other day.
Sure, there was the occasional outreach and the random website that you could register but never an email with a bosses signature on it blabbering on about cancer studies and how much they care.

Everyone seems to have forgotten how piss poor the management of this thing was at ALL levels of our civilian and military leadership - in a country that likes to bludgeon you over the head with phrases like 'trust the science' - and how disgracefully heavy handed our senior leaders were about "mandating" that our service-members and civil-servants "voluntarily" accepted the vaccine...
...under the threat of possible termination or loss of benefits

Maybe this is different - maybe this is "long" cancer or something equally horrific that we are just supposed to be afraid of - because it is a total coincidence and is totally not related to the CVOVID vacine that isnt even a vaccine.
Oh, and before I forget...
(Not a Doctor)
 

Don't let the cock suckers and collaborators forget.
Yup, all these people need to pay. Not only for what they did, but for hiding and obfuscating intelligence when the Chinese had their fuck up. Same with the vaccines. At this point, I'm wondering if people like Soros, Davos, and Schwab, didn't take advantage of this to "decrease the world's surplus population".
 
Records are out. A FOIA request from last year showed that Fauci, the NIH (National Health Institute), and HHS (US Dept. of Health and Human Services), knew about the virus, directly the funded China's Wuhan institute to study it, and lied about treatments like Ivermectin not being useful.

There is a lot more in the Judicial Watch link. TLDR, these people conspired with the Chinese then lied to us, killed a chunk of our population, and helped bring about an economic and political collapse. Turns out the Tinfoil Hat Bro's were right.

Judicial Watch: FBI Records Indicate Fauci Agency Funded Gain-of-Function Wuhan Lab Research ‘Would leave no signatures of purposeful human manipulation’ - Judicial Watch

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received 5 pages of records from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that show an April 2020 email exchange with several officials in the bureau’s Newark Field Office referring to Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China as including “gain-of-function research” which “would leave no signature of purposeful human manipulation.”

Judicial Watch obtained the records in response to a May 17, 2023, FOIA request for: emails and text messages of the Newark Field Office, including to Special Agent David A. Miller, containing the terms “gain of function,” “GoF,” “R01A|110964,” and/or “EcoHealth.” Judicial Watch sent the FOIA request to follow up on uncovering the FBI Newark Field Office’s investigation of the Fauci agency’s gain-of-function grants after the Covid-19 pandemic began.

On April 23, 2020, an email exchange with the subject “Follow up call” takes place between several unnamed Newark Field Office FBI officials. A person whose name is redacted writes:

Details of the current NIAID [Fauci’s National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases] grant for WIV [Wuhan Institute of Virology] bat coronavirus surveillance and WIV bat coronavirus gain-of-function research are available at: RePORT 〉 RePORTER [summary of NIH grant to EcoHealth Alliance for Project 2R01AI110964-06]. The key activity for bat coronavirus surveillance is ‘Aim 1 … We will sequence receptor binding domains (spike proteins) to identify viruses with the highest potential for spillover which we will include in our experimental investigations. (Aim 3).’

The key activity for bat coronavirus gain of function is “Aim 3 … We will use S protein sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that 0/0 divergence thresholds in S protein sequences predict spillover potential.” Translated into lay language, this equates to: “In Aim 3, we will use de novo synthesis to construct novel viruses encoding different spike proteins in an otherwise-constant genomic context, and we will test the ability of the resulting novel viruses to infect human cells in culture and to infect laboratory animals. We hypothesize that there is a direct correlation between the receptor binding affinity of the spike protein and the abilities to infect human cells in culture and to infect laboratory animals. We will test this hypothesis by asking whether novel viruses encoding spike proteins with the highest receptor-binding affinity have the highest abilities to infect human cells in culture and to infect laboratory animals.”

The reason I am writing is that the experimental strategy proposed in Aim 3 (“infectious clone technology”), if performed using commercial or in-house gene synthesis to prepare the infectious clones, *** would leave no signatures of purposeful human manipulation***.

A colleague replies:

Hey, are you going to be in office tomorrow? We just interviewed our person from [redacted] again and he provided us with some alarming new info. Give me call if you can.

The email thread is then forwarded by the Newark Office Assistant Special Agent in Charge-National Security Branch (ASAC-NSB), whose name is redacted, to then-special agent in charge of the Newark Field Office, Gregory Ehrie:

This is interesting. I’m following up with the squad tomorrow morning.

Ehrie replies:

[Redacted] Details when you can.

“These smoking gun documents showed the FBI quickly understood that Fauci’s agency funded the gain-of-function research that could disguise the resulting coronavirus as ‘natural,’” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These new documents further demonstrate the need for a comprehensive criminal investigation into Fauci’s gain-of-function scandal.”

Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuits and investigations have uncovered much of what the public knows about many Covid-19 controversies:

  • Emails between U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and top Facebook executives in 2021 regarding the censorship of user posts about Covid controversies showed Facebook leadership seeking to “better understand the scope of what the White House expects from us on misinformation going forward.”
  • Records from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) showed that a Pfizer study surveyed 23 people in 2021 to gauge reactions to its Covid vaccine booster before asking the FDA to approve it.
  • Records from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) included the initial grant application and annual reports to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from EcoHealth Alliance, describing the aim of its work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to create mutant viruses “to better predict the capacity of our CoVs [coronaviruses] to infect people.”
  • HHS records included emails of then-Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Francis Collins showing a British physicians’ group recommended the use of Ivermectin to prevent and treat Covid-19.
  • Heavily redacted HHS records showed that just two days prior to FDA approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine a discussion was held between U.S. and UK health regulators regarding the Covid shot and “anaphylaxis,” with the regulators emphasizing their “mutual confidentiality agreement.”
  • Judicial Watch obtained HHS records regarding data Moderna submitted to the FDA on its mRNA Covid-19 vaccine, which indicated a “statistically significant” number of rats were born with skeletal deformations after their mothers were injected with the vaccine. The documents also revealed Moderna elected not to conduct a number of standard pharmacological studies on the laboratory test animals.
  • Heavily redacted records from the FDA regarding the Covid-19 booster vaccine detailed pressure on Covid booster use and approval.
  • HHS records detailed internal discussions about myocarditis and the Covid vaccine. Other documents detailed adverse “events for which a contributory effect of the vaccine could not be excluded.”
  • Judicial Watch uncovered HHS records detailing the extensive media plans for a Biden administration propaganda campaign to push the Covid-19 vaccine.
  • HHS records revealed previously redacted locations of Covid-19 vaccine testing facilities in Shanghai, China. The FDA had claimed the name and location of the testing facilities were protected by the confidential commercial information exemption of the FOIA.
  • NIH records showed an FBI “inquiry” into the NIH’s controversial bat coronavirus grant tied to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The records also showed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) officials were concerned about “gain-of-function” research in China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2016. The Fauci agency was also concerned about EcoHealth Alliance’s lack of compliance with reporting rules and use of gain-of-function research in the NIH-funded research involving bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China.
  • Texas Public Information Act (PIA) records showed the former director of the Galveston National Laboratory at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Dr. James W. Le Duc, warned Chinese researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology of potential investigations into the Covid issue by Congress.
  • HHS records regarding biodistribution studies and related data for the Covid-19 vaccines showed how a key component of the vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), were found outside the injection site, mainly the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries of test animals, eight to 48 hours after injection.
  • Records obtained from HHS through a FOIA lawsuit related to hydroxychloroquine and Covid-19 revealed that a grant to EcoHealth Alliance was cancelled because of press reports that a portion of the grant was given to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
  • HHS records revealed that from 2014 to 2019, $826,277 was given to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research by the NIAID.
  • NIAID records showed that it gave nine China-related grants to EcoHealth Alliance to research coronavirus emergence in bats and was the NIH’s top issuer of grants to the Wuhan lab itself. The records also included an email from the vice director of the Wuhan Lab asking an NIH official for help finding disinfectants for decontamination of airtight suits and indoor surfaces.
  • HHS records included an “urgent for Dr. Fauci” email chain, citing ties between the Wuhan lab and the taxpayer-funded EcoHealth Alliance. The government emails also reported that the foundation of U.S. billionaire Bill Gates worked closely with the Chinese government to pave the way for Chinese-produced medications to be sold outside China and help “raise China’s voice of governance by placing representatives from China on important international counsels as high level commitment from China.”
  • Judicial Watch’s four-part documentary regarding the coordinated effort by the government and Big Tech to censor and suppress information on topics such as Hunter Biden’s laptop, Covid-19, and election debates is available here.

One of the grants
RePORT 〉 RePORTER
 
Back
Top