Whichever dipshit wrote this article can go fuck themselves. Breonna Taylor didn’t deserve to get killed.
National Protest and 'disband the cops' discussion (please review page 1)
- Thread starter Ooh-Rah
- Start date
Blizzard
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2012
- Messages
- 4,026
I don't see any issues with the way the article was written. It's simply a synopsis of the report that many of us here saw a few weeks ago.
No one is saying she deserved to die; she didn't. However, the truth also isn't what has been pushed and continues to be stated by the left and many in the mainstream media.
Taylor was the unfortunate victim of her own circumstances; none of which, by the way, has nothing to do with the color of her skin.
Did the cop deserve to get shot?
Locksteady
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 672
She was the unfortunate victim of careless police behavior, at the very least, to which the color of her skin has in no way been ruled out as a contributing factor.
Florida173
SOF Support
Are you suggesting they should have done the no-knock instead, or shoot the person that was shooting at them?
Blizzard
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2012
- Messages
- 4,026
You're certainly entitled to that view but I find it misguided and it doesn't align with the facts.
As an aside, one thing I have not seen related to the case, and I don't know if it was released, but who's rounds killed Taylor? Where did it come from specifically? Was there more than one fatal injury? I'd be curious to know this.
Last edited:
No he didn’t
Jaknight
Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2018
- Messages
- 764
Are you saying she may have been shot cause she was black? That maybe true or it could have been an unfortunate circumstance due to her being associated with a drug dealer but who knows
Last edited:
Locksteady
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 672
You can find it misguided, but it doesn't mean that it doesn't align with the facts. It means other people have different interpretations from you and the grand jury about whether or not three officers firing 30+ rounds into a house from multiple directions in response to one shot fired constituted a reckless response.
The court neither addressed nor established whether or not race as a contributing factor, so it is unwarranted to claim that it wasn't and then assert it as a determined fact.
Kentucky AG confirmed that Detected Cosgrove fired the killing shot.
Breonna Taylor lawyer slams 'devilish' proceedings
Jaknight
Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2018
- Messages
- 764
Thing is the cops didn’t just roll up and say hey let’s go into that house and start a gun fight and to try to bring race into it turns it into the festival we see now
Locksteady
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 672
I'm saying it, to my awareness, was never ruled out as a contributing factor. This was in response to Blizzard's (as yet) unsubstantiated positive claim that color had nothing to do with it.
Jaknight
Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2018
- Messages
- 764
Do you believe it was a factor? If so why I’m interested to know
Locksteady
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 672
It's hard to tell.
Jaknight
Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2018
- Messages
- 764
How so? What makes you think it could be?
Locksteady
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 672
The same logic that allows you to consider any other factor, such as awareness of involvement with drug dealers, a possible contributor to their response.
Locksteady
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 672
^ Sorry, I believe I misspoke on your meaning, as you mentioned the drug dealer association more as the factor that caused her to be where she was, rather than a psychological factor influencing their response.
In short, @Jaknight, evidence is only necessary to rule out the possibility - not to allow for it.
In short, @Jaknight, evidence is only necessary to rule out the possibility - not to allow for it.
@Locksteady I would really appreciate you adding supporting articles from newsworthy sources in these threads going forward.
Hey guys, a pleasure to be here.
@Locksteady you're an unvetted member of the board. You've made a habit of turning up the temperature to every conversation you're in; stop it. I am telling you now. As far as I am concerned, on this board, you're a child with an email. Prove me wrong or move along. Until then, no one has any reason to give credence to your opinions. If you'd like, go to the comments section of Fox News or CNN, you can be anonymous there too. In this board, unless you carry a tag, you only carry the smallest possible amount of credibility.
Oh, by the way, you can ignore members of the staff or anyone that doesn't agree with your opinions, like @R.Caerbannog has pointed out before. I encourage you all to do this.
TO THE OTHER MEMBERS, PLEASE REMEMBER AND INTERNALIZE THIS FACT. You can ignore @Locksteady or @R.Caerbannog or me or anyone you want. You don't need to play along with a member that is here to antagonize. You can ignore them. If you remember, from the last time we did this whole dance in 2016- YOU ARENT GOING TO CHANGE ANYONE'S MIND EITHER WAY.
Everyone else- fucking knock it off. How many times does the staff need to tell you? Don't be emotional. This is a private site where you agreed to terms and conditions when you signed on. Lots of you are active military members. More of you are veterans. If you can't respond with the smallest modicum of respect for people, we don't want you here.
I don't speak for the rest of the staff, but y'all are fucking out of line.
@Locksteady you're an unvetted member of the board. You've made a habit of turning up the temperature to every conversation you're in; stop it. I am telling you now. As far as I am concerned, on this board, you're a child with an email. Prove me wrong or move along. Until then, no one has any reason to give credence to your opinions. If you'd like, go to the comments section of Fox News or CNN, you can be anonymous there too. In this board, unless you carry a tag, you only carry the smallest possible amount of credibility.
Oh, by the way, you can ignore members of the staff or anyone that doesn't agree with your opinions, like @R.Caerbannog has pointed out before. I encourage you all to do this.
TO THE OTHER MEMBERS, PLEASE REMEMBER AND INTERNALIZE THIS FACT. You can ignore @Locksteady or @R.Caerbannog or me or anyone you want. You don't need to play along with a member that is here to antagonize. You can ignore them. If you remember, from the last time we did this whole dance in 2016- YOU ARENT GOING TO CHANGE ANYONE'S MIND EITHER WAY.
Everyone else- fucking knock it off. How many times does the staff need to tell you? Don't be emotional. This is a private site where you agreed to terms and conditions when you signed on. Lots of you are active military members. More of you are veterans. If you can't respond with the smallest modicum of respect for people, we don't want you here.
I don't speak for the rest of the staff, but y'all are fucking out of line.
Similar threads
