Unlike the Marine Corps, the army does not have meritorious promotions.
Yeah, we didn't have that in the Navy either.
AF promotion system is more a single test.Honestly the point threshold fluctuated enough that if you didn't have significant awards or additional schools that it could stop someone. But you also managed this at PLT or section level. Although one of my section leaders took one guy to the board (before I got there) who was an absolute shit head. But wouldn't take another who was a legit leader because he hadn't done one specific thing for him. We bring in a new section leader and the kid goes to the board 4 months later.
Point is that it's not automatic like the Air Force in taking a test. I would also say BLC is too short. 3 weeks? That's not enough time.
AF promotion system is more a single test.
E5 to E7 is a point system.
Two multiple choice exams, one AFSC specific, and another on general AF knowledge.
Performance Reports, decorations, TIS and TIG round it out.
To add, and this is something you know but others won't, is when the AF does use a single test it is the AF knowledge test. The AFSC-specific test will "go away" during times with sweeping changes to the AFSC or other significant events. For example, a decade or so ago the AF combined Ground Radio and SATCOM; the AFSC-specific test was re-written and not used for 2-3 years while everyone OJT'ed the specifics on the gaining skillsets. I vaguely recall a single test happening to 1C5's about 2016 or so, but could be mistaken on that point.
I kind of like the line number system. Is that a reflection of your "score" for that promotion cycle?
Sadly no, date of rank based.To add, and this is something you know but others won't, is when the AF does use a single test it is the AF knowledge test. The AFSC-specific test will "go away" during times with sweeping changes to the AFSC or other significant events. For example, a decade or so ago the AF combined Ground Radio and SATCOM; the AFSC-specific test was re-written and not used for 2-3 years while everyone OJT'ed the specifics on the gaining skillsets. I vaguely recall a single test happening to 1C5's about 2016 or so, but could be mistaken on that point.
I kind of like the line number system. Is that a reflection of your "score" for that promotion cycle?
Look at who wrote the Military dot com's version. Bet if you dig into his social media and personal connections the guy is a lemming. Based on his profile he was a Navy intel guy who sold out to CNN.So, there are definitely extremists in the Service. But they are not "right wing" ones. Unless we're considered that automatically for not putting pronouns in our signatures. They are of the DEI ilk.
Opinion | The Military’s Phantom ‘Extremists’
Military dot com obviously had a more party line take...
Pentagon Effort on Extremism Snarled by Confusion, Guard Divisions, Gaps in Security Clearance Screening
Everyone in the world is "overly comfortable" due to Pax Americana... especially most Americans.Articles like this don't help but the need for articles like this to be written cause more damage to recruitment and retention. Once you get past the "Canadian's are soft" part, it is truly honest about the sad state we're in. Oh and all the new procurement projects they praise, had been canceled and restarted or delayed by this current government when they gained power 8 years ago. It's everything else that's not on that list that's falling apart.
Senior military leader: Canadians 'overly comfortable' as global security shifts
On the bright side, we're building stuff again. No more outsourcing critical components and supply chains to people who hate our guts. Trades are making a comeback. It also means that people are less likely to tolerate the woke commie shenanigans Miley, Austin, and liberal party are pushing.Everyone in the world is "overly comfortable" due to Pax Americana... especially most Americans.
It has to get worse. It has to get A LOT worse before people are willing to make significant and lasting changes. People who aren't affected by a problem are not usually motivated to do anything about it. That's why our last period of major conflict lasted for 20+ years. "Doesn't affect me in any meaningful way, IDGAF."People have been getting their rude awakenings and it's only gonna get worse.
The U.S. Government defined.People who aren't affected by a problem are not usually motivated to do anything about it.
It has to get worse. It has to get A LOT worse before people are willing to make significant and lasting changes. People who aren't affected by a problem are not usually motivated to do anything about it. That's why our last period of major conflict lasted for 20+ years. "Doesn't affect me in any meaningful way, IDGAF."
The exception to that is, when people are so secure in their lives, property, and freedoms that they don't really have anything meaningful to worry about and put their energies towards, they either start taking on other peoples' problems, or they start inventing ones of their own. We can see that manifested in things like BLM and the gender identity cult.
Things can't just "get bad" or "get worse," they have to get BAD ENOUGH.
We're seeing in major US cities the consequences of bad decisions on things like crime and immigration. It has gotten BAD ENOUGH for some people in those places to want to do something about them.
So, there are definitely extremists in the Service. But they are not "right wing" ones. Unless we're considered that automatically for not putting pronouns in our signatures. They are of the DEI ilk.
Opinion | The Military’s Phantom ‘Extremists’
Military dot com obviously had a more party line take...
Pentagon Effort on Extremism Snarled by Confusion, Guard Divisions, Gaps in Security Clearance Screening
But also...their amphibious assault ships don't have crews...