The Trump Presidency 2.0

This part is debatable. Studies show bad apples often have unstable childhoods. Manson, Ramirez, Eileen Weornos, and the list goes on. I also wonder how many are drug addicts and/ or eating up entitlements in the US?
I totally get that. My first degree was in Anthropology. So I definitely understand nature vs nurture and the differences in human evolution. I just think that even though we have issues with our own citizens, we should have focused inward. Not that migration is bad, but a lot of nations dumped their problem children here.

The data are pretty clear; while the middle class and upper/middle class yammer the loudest about abortion, they are also the fewest to get abortions. The bottom 20% is the highest percentage to have abortions; it follows, also the least likely to have opportunities and income.

But I am not sure there is data to support the bad apple theory as much as the self-perpetuating cycle of entitlements.

The other elephant in the room is that blacks far and away have more abortions than any other race/ethnicity, and we know that Margaret Sanger was a loud and proud racist to pushed abortion onto black women.
I'll be honest, I still think think the biggest issue is culture. Up until the destruction of the nuclear family and counter cultural revolution, Black American's we're more integrated into society. Now, black culture has devolved into the worst parts of consumerism, excess, and nihilism.
 
I'll be honest, I still think think the biggest issue is culture. Up until the destruction of the nuclear family and counter cultural revolution, Black American's we're more integrated into society. Now, black culture has devolved into the worst parts of consumerism, excess, and nihilism.

I agree that is part of it, and that happened to coincide with the Civil Rights Act and other legislation in the '60s which sounded good in theory but really marginalized black Americans.
 
This part is debatable. Studies show bad apples often have unstable childhoods. Manson, Ramirez, Eileen Weornos, and the list goes on. I also wonder how many are drug addicts and/ or eating up entitlements in the US?
You think all those immigrant families are stable?
TdA is forcing young girls into the sex industry, you think their parents knew that ahead of time.
 
You think all those immigrant families are stable?
TdA is forcing young girls into the sex industry, you think their parents knew that ahead of time.

No and I'd not even try to make a case against that. I'm fully on board with Trump on immigration. I don't want bad hombres of any nationality.
 
Elon Musk’s DOGE Shares Classified U.S. Intel With Entire World

No Problem GIF by MOODMAN
 
Sounds like bullshit. Oh... it is. All based on the testimony of one, "anonymous [sic] employee".
You don't have to take their word for it, and if you won't be bothered to go and see for yourself, then this discussion is over.

Caveat for clearance holders: For obvious reasons I don't recommend following our community Rabbit down That Hole, but the fact that this is now something you'd all actually need to be concerned about running into on an official public-facing .gov page should be problem enough.

Also in today's latest WTF news:
US nuclear weapons agency hit by layoffs after DOGE exemption denied
 
You don't have to take their word for it, and if you won't be bothered to go and see for yourself, then this discussion is over.

Caveat for clearance holders: For obvious reasons I don't recommend following our community Rabbit down That Hole, but the fact that this is now something you'd all actually need to be concerned about running into on an official public-facing .gov page should be problem enough.

Also in today's latest WTF news:
US nuclear weapons agency hit by layoffs after DOGE exemption denied
Not sure what you're implying, but Iemme break some things down Barney Style.

The screeching about the hacked website, is overblown. DOGE isn't using a website as a repository for sensitive information. It's basically an image board. Secondly, we've had like... three(?), OPM hacks that have exposed the information of every government worker; to include the military and paper pushing dorks. So... this website thing is overblown.

Oh! Did some digging on the author of the article you posted. Looks like the dude is a liberal activist being paid to write a shitload of anti-Trump pieces. Don't believe me, take a gander down below.
https://muckrack.com/hafiz-rashid/articles
1739595889702.png

1739595810476.png

Note that Rashid's "article" is an opinion piece as well. The source he quotes Malcolm Ferguson, is also suspect.

https://muckrack.com/malcolm-ferguson/articles
1739596217100.png

1739596154346.png

The two stooges. Take a look at their pedigrees. Not exactly bastions of honesty.
1739596428761.png
1739596495576.png
 
Last edited:
Caveat for clearance holders: For obvious reasons I don't recommend following our community Rabbit down That Hole, but the fact that this is now something you'd all actually need to be concerned about running into on an official public-facing .gov page should be problem enough.
I just wanted to add that I find your quote both hilarious and kinda sad. I'm a semi-retarded window licker. Anything and everything I post is open source. Making me out to be a threat towards informational analysis and security is kinda pathetic.

1739598594908.png
 
Not sure what you're implying, but Iemme break some things down Barney Style.

The screeching about the hacked website, is overblown.
If you want to break things down Barney-style, then maybe don't start by introducing a second topic that wasn't being addressed in the first place.

DOGE isn't using a website as a repository for sensitive information.
Firstly, they shared classified intelligence information with the world, and that is a fact.

Secondly, why are you introducing the idea that I or anyone discussing this here claimed DOGE was using a website as a "repository" for sensitive information beyond its release of a classified information about an intelligence agency?

It's basically an image board. Secondly, we've had like... three(?), OPM hacks that have exposed the information of every government worker; to include the military and paper pushing dorks. So... this website thing is overblown.
Why are you conflating a hack by an outside actor with the sharing of classified information on an entire intelligence agency by an appointed government official onto his agency's publicly accessible official government website?

Oh! Did some digging on the author of the article you posted. Looks like the dude is a liberal activist being paid to write a shitload of anti-Trump pieces. Don't believe me, take a gander down below.
How would who the author is change the fact that what they reported about DOGE sharing classified information to the world about an US intelligence agency was true?
 
Back
Top