I'm not gonna type this in all caps- but I am not fucking with you here. This message is not me being a dick or setting up a gotcha.
I just read the entire signal chat-
@AWP in your estimation, can you make the case for a no-shit spillage there? OPSEC is a no brainer- times, places, actions.
@GOTWA you mentioned Tulsi would have to take her OCA again when she said there was no spillage here- is there a specific section that's a home run? Again, I stress I am not joking, I have no clue as to how the IT game works except from end user.
I thought folks had seen the entire chat already, but the Atlantic drop was an hour ago. Are there any products on the thread? Did someone share a COF?
***I am not making this case***, but I will call the spin right now. Coupled with the already bubbling "Look at the actual messages- high-level officials having adult conversations about second- and third-order effects, the adults are back in charge, and the signal leak is better optics vs total cost of the scandal" narrative, people are 100% going to start nitpicking OPSEC vs spillage.
"It didn't say WHAT F-18s in WHICH package- the ATO isn't for release so of course we didn't specify, that's bad OPSEC but not what the Dems are making it seem." That's the next iteration of this one.
ETA- Watlz and other surrogates posting exactly what I said-
"Waltz wrote on X "No locations. No sources & methods. NO WAR PLANS. Foreign partners had already been notified that strikes were imminent. BOTTOM LINE: President Trump is protecting America and our interests." I didn't call it before it happened, but I also hadn't checked the news before I did... -1 to myself