So here's this theory of mine and I may get roasted for it. I recognize PTSD when I see it. Sometimes it is not at first but eventually I catch on. I've seen this before with another, not the lying part, it's the dire desperate need to overcompensate through lying for a day or days that went horribly wrong. Him being super aggressive about may be his subconscious reaction that he is angry with both himself to tell that lie and because of what may have occurred.
James Yeager. Y'all remember him? Ever since he ditch dove he had since tried to hard up on everything, all alpha man. It was a facade, he was having PTSD from that day and the rage he was showing as "Me alpha, you not" in both his classes, social media responses, and on YouTube (a social media extension). His entire persona was to make up for that day by doing what he thought was a way to not get people killed and that drivers dive and not abandon their posts.
I could be wrong though. Thoughts?
I think PTSD has become an excuse for any misconduct involving a veteran.
I can see a momentary lapse, or maybe not correcting someone in the moment when they accidently church up your creds. But not a BSM(V) and a Purple Heart. Not "bags of grenades" and all of the other things he talked about in his book that are in dispute. That's... that's something different.
I've mentioned before on the site that a few years back a guy saw the 160th sticker on the back of my Jeep as he was going by my house as part of a holiday parade on West Point. He shouted out "which battalion?" and without thinking I responded, loudly and confidently, "Third!" I wasn't in 3rd battalion, I was in 2nd. 3rd Battalion of the 160th isn't the sexy Night Stalker battalion, 1st was/is. I don't know why I said 3rd. And the only reason I knew I did it was because my wife asked me about it after the parade passed. It was a momentary and insignificant lapse, but it happened. So I get it.
When I was in 5th Group, I had to frequently make polite corrections when people, especially my younger sister, would explain to people that I'm meeting for the first time that I was "Special Forces." No, I'm "in a Special Forces unit,
being Special Forces is something different." People not in the know don't understand there's a difference, "um, how can you be
in the Special Forces but not
be Special Forces?" Sometimes people make you out to be more than you are, I get it. And if you're getting introduced live on TV and someone says "this guy has a Purple Heart" or "BSM(V)" or whatever, maybe you don't feel like you have a chance to correct it on the spot. I like to think that I would, because I don't want the Internet lynch mob coming after me. But it hasn't happened so I don't know for sure.
The BSM vs BSM(V) thing is always interesting. A BSM without a V is just a wartime MSM. I know, because I have four of them. I did a good job downrange, but if I did what I did outside of Iraq and Afghanistan, those would either be impact MSMs or bullet comments on my PCS award. That's just the way it is. But a lot of people outside of the military don't understand that you can get the same(ish) award for merit and for valor, and mostly the only people talking about their BSMs publicly are ones who have (V), the public conflates the two. This happens a lot even at USMA with the underclass cadets; "Wow you have four Bronze Stars, you must have really been in the shit!" No, not really, never been in a firefight, never killed anyone directly, got shot at just enough to earn a CAB. I'm proud of what I did and did a good job, but I also know what I didn't do, which was a lot, and I never want to take away from the people who did do valorous-type things (many of which weren't recognized in the way they should have been, if at all) by claiming credit for things I didn't do. I'm comfortable with who I am and what I did. It's too bad when vets go the way that Tim Kennedy now admits to doing.