Your 2024 Presidential Election Thread

I cannot stop thinking about the SS woman who could not holster her weapon and in a longer version of that same video, she (and one other) had seemingly no clue what she was supposed to be doing or where she was supposed to be. I was embarrassed for her, I’m sure the after action reviews will not be kind.

I believe…

That the average person believes the men/women of action should respond/react like we see in the movies and on TV. (In the Line of Fire comes to mind)

That the average person believes the men/women of Government should respond/react like we see in the movies and on TV. (West Wing comes to mind)

That when those human beings don’t live up to our (usually unrealistic) standards of expectation, we react with anger/disappointment and call for heads or claim it must of been an inside job.

Sometimes people just suck at their jobs, even if we don’t want them to. The “why” that they suck is a very different conversation.

I agree with our post. This is human nature.

To the bolded/italicized, I think people need to read "On Combat" and "On Killing." There are some sus parts in each book, but his explanations to the physiological response to danger and trauma are real. Ability to do fine motor skills deteriorate, so holstering a weapon becomes more difficult. Unaware of where to be and what to do comes from task saturation and multiple stimuli.

You can practice the skill 1,000 times under created stress, but when it turns real all bets are off.
 
She heard shots from somewhere and pulled out her pistol and started scanning her lane. The diamond guys collapsed on the President, she looks like she was outside the diamond, maybe like the "well".

IDK, but her main fault was not re-holstering. The whole detail doesn't collapse on/crowd the principal unless their formation called for it, which I doubt.
 
I might take some heat for this, but I don't care if Trump wins. Whatever.

What I do care about is the implosion of the Left in America. Delicious. My loins tingle. I drink their tears of despair and their anguish fuels me.

And the best way for the above is a Trump victory.
 
I might take some heat for this, but I don't care if Trump wins. Whatever.

What I do care about is the implosion of the Left in America. Delicious. My loins tingle. I drink their tears of despair and their anguish fuels me.

And the best way for the above is a Trump victory.

Absolutely agree. I'm no staunch Trump fan but watching the lefts heads explode will make me giggle and snort.

We can both agree, if this is the best America can offer for POTUS, we are fucked but I'd rather see Trump over Biden.

That said, if I knew that a Democrat that would abide by our constitution would run, I'd have no issues voting for them.

Problem is, the left, the right, 2 heads of the same nasty, vile, blood sucking leach, base defiling goul savages.

If we think we still have a constitutional republic, we are fucking joking ourselves. Our republic was sold out to corporations and foreign entities, decades ago and the illusion of a fair and democratic nation is all we have.

Bread and circus.
 
I might take some heat for this, but I don't care if Trump wins. Whatever.

What I do care about is the implosion of the Left in America. Delicious. My loins tingle. I drink their tears of despair and their anguish fuels me.

And the best way for the above is a Trump victory.

I can't handle the amount of winning over these past few weeks. No bullshit, I never thought I'd see the day when the left turn on themselves and eat their own over a sitting president, not to mention all the losses in court.
 
General question since the tides have shifted now:

When is rhetoric actually dangerous and when is it just "colorful language"?

A bunch of people on here posting about how "violent the dem rhetoric are" are the same people who've argued with me for over 4 years that words hold basically no power unless its a direct call for violence.

Hell, some of the posters on here pretty commonly make violent statements against "feds" or whole groups of people and (aside from one specific member) rarely get admonished.
 
General question since the tides have shifted now:

When is rhetoric actually dangerous and when is it just "colorful language"?

A bunch of people on here posting about how "violent the dem rhetoric are" are the same people who've argued with me for over 4 years that words hold basically no power unless its a direct call for violence.

Hell, some of the posters on here pretty commonly make violent statements against "feds" or whole groups of people and (aside from one specific member) rarely get admonished.
There's a difference between words from members here and words directly from the sitting POTUS.
 
I might take some heat for this, but I don't care if Trump wins. Whatever.

What I do care about is the implosion of the Left in America. Delicious. My loins tingle. I drink their tears of despair and their anguish fuels me.
I might take some heat for this, but I don’t care… It’s my truth and I believe it. Whatever.

“We” conservatives, rhinos, Republicans, whatever you want to refer to ourselves as, have over the years mimicked the same cries of despair and anguish that we accuse left of.

It’s actually pretty embarrassing. I used to take pride in the fact that “we” would take the high road regardless of what the left was doing, essentially treating the them as little children having a temper tantrum. Sadly those days are behind us and in many ways, we have morphed into the same temper-tantrum having snowflakes we accuse them of being.
 
Seeing the reaction from the Left—and I don’t mean the political and media elites who are doing the no-violence dance to avoid being targeted themselves—I'm talking about the average leftist. The reaction has been quite disappointing to me. I've seen some who say it shouldn’t have happened and are horrified by it, but many are either blaming him in a roundabout way, wishing he had gotten shot, or straight-up believing it was rigged. They seem to either deny or can’t admit that they are just as villainous as they make their opposition seem. Had this been Biden, their reaction would be calling for blood and demanding Trump be dealt with. Perhaps we are too far apart now as country
 
General question since the tides have shifted now:

When is rhetoric actually dangerous and when is it just "colorful language"?

A bunch of people on here posting about how "violent the dem rhetoric are" are the same people who've argued with me for over 4 years that words hold basically no power unless its a direct call for violence.

Hell, some of the posters on here pretty commonly make violent statements against "feds" or whole groups of people and (aside from one specific member) rarely get admonished.

You referring to me and my utter disdain for feds, brother?
 
I dont know what he's alluding to, but I do know...Feds gonna Fed. Only because I had a close friend have thousands in legal assets seiezed years ago and still hasn't faced any charges. Legitimate brick and mortar shop owner..... on top of the various documentaries, court cases etc that are out there.

The left invented shouting people down during the Bush years. As far as I remember in my lifetime. I wasn't alive to see or hear about VN Vets getting spit on etc.

Lawfare is a thing, I've heard the term 91 felonies a few times in the past few months, I remember OP EDs in NYT calling for the Bush twins to get waterboarded... I don't like hearing the ninny ass Rs calling for resignations every time things don't go right, but the bar seems to be a lot higher on the conservative side when calling for people to loose their job, jail time etc.
 
Mayorkas was on Good Morning America instead of the White House to hand in his resignation.

This is probably the most significant part of the story.

CNN, citing an unidentified spokesperson, reports that the Secret Service did not sweep the building the gunman was atop before the rally. Instead, they allegedly relied on local law enforcement to monitor the area. PEOPLE was not able to independently confirm this claim.

Gunman Shouldn't Have Had 'Direct Line' to Donald Trump for Assassination Attempt: Homeland Security Secretary
 
Back
Top