TLDR20
Verified SOF
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 6,245
Fake that he was driving the car or that he used campaign funds to purchase it. I'm confused
Both. FALSE: Bernie Sanders Bought a $172,000 Car with Campaign Donations
Fake that he was driving the car or that he used campaign funds to purchase it. I'm confused
Agree, but I disagree with the notion that Benghazi chatter should be taken seriously any more. Like I've said before: the email scandal is legit, Benghazi is not (at least, not any more). From where I stand, if seven (or is it eight?) separate investigations can't come up with any evidence of wrongdoing, then it's a dead issue.You know, the whole email thing, Benghazi, it doesn't matter to anyone not a Republican. For all the Dems it's just white noise and won't change their vote. Trump's bluster and statements have the same effect on the pro-Trump crowd. The people who are getting up in arms over his speeches won't vote for him anyway.
Bern's a quitter and who stuck around long enough to endorse the party and candidate that wrecked him. He then took his ball and went home after taking his supporter's money only to fold like a cheap suit.
He's garbage.
Agree, but I disagree with the notion that Benghazi chatter should be taken seriously any more. Like I've said before: the email scandal is legit, Benghazi is not (at least, not any more). From where I stand, if seven (or is it eight?) separate investigations can't come up with any evidence of wrongdoing, then it's a dead issue.
Trump's gonna be a fun president. Problem is, he's probably not going to be president.
The claims are highly questionable, though, as it is extremely unlikely that Bernie Sanders would be driving himself in a vehicle trailing his own campaign bus (especially without Secret Service protection in tow), even more so as Sanders was stumping in Arizona that day and was not scheduled to appear with "Black Men for Bernie."
Agree, but I disagree with the notion that Benghazi chatter should be taken seriously any more. Like I've said before: the email scandal is legit, Benghazi is not (at least, not any more). From where I stand, if seven (or is it eight?) separate investigations can't come up with any evidence of wrongdoing, then it's a dead issue.[/QUOTyE]
Who did the investigating that you're talking about?
Bern's a quitter and who stuck around long enough to endorse the party and candidate that wrecked him. He then took his ball and went home after taking his supporter's money only to fold like a cheap suit.
He's garbage.
I strongly disagree. I believe he never had a chance and his rise in the primaries certainly scared the Clinton camp. I think Clinton was pre-ordained to be the Democrat's nominee after Obama which is why she became SECSTATE: to claim experience. The association of and timing of the last two chairs of the DNC with the Clinton's should raise some eyebrows. Yes, I know, it's just yet another coincidence and there's no there there.
In chronological order:Who did the investigating that you're talking about?
I strongly disagree. I believe he never had a chance and his rise in the primaries certainly scared the Clinton camp. I think Clinton was pre-ordained to be the Democrat's nominee after Obama which is why she became SECSTATE: to claim experience. The association of and timing of the last two chairs of the DNC with the Clinton's should raise some eyebrows. Yes, I know, it's just yet another coincidence and there's no there there.
To me you're partially proving my point. The guy's platform was based around taking on the system. He was then played by the system and his own party, so his response is to endorse Clinton and then leave? This guy was going to fight on behalf of the poor and downtrodden or whatever, but he sold out and ran with his tail between his legs?
Of course Clinton was preordained and he never stood a chance, but my problem is he took on the system and then ran away when he lost, even after it was proven his own peeps worked to undermine his campaign. He just crapped on every single Sanders supporter and those idiots will STILL vote a straight Dem. ticket because Trump.
In chronological order:
-State Department accountability review board
-The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
-The Senate Committee On Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs
-The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
-The House Committee on Foreign Affairs
-The House Committee on the Judiciary
-The House Committee on Armed Services
-The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
And finally, The House Select Committee on Benghazi
So it was more like 9. Courtesy of the fine folks at Politifact
I believe that Ockham's Razor applies here. All Americans should be in an uproar over this but instead...oh look, Big Bang is on tonight!
None of the reviews recommended significant reviews, let alone criminal charges. Was Holder just supposed to say "Nah fuck that, I'mma start charging people!" Come on man.When the standing AG (at the time) is held in CRIMINAL contempt of Congress, the message is clear to the rest of the Executive branch: Congress is a paper tiger so there's no need to cooperate.
You could hear it on CNN. I was joking that it would be news soon.