This is:
A. A euphemism for masturbation
B. A euphemism for your mom
C. An actual quote or thought
D. All of the above
My SAT scores were pretty low, so I'm going with "All of the above."
2016 Presidential Race
- Thread starter Theirb123
- Start date
- Status
This is:
A. A euphemism for masturbation
B. A euphemism for your mom
C. An actual quote or thought
D. All of the above
My SAT scores were pretty low, so I'm going with "All of the above."
An interesting thing this happened this weekend. Remember Khizr Khan? The Pakistani father of a slain U.S. Army soldier, who was Muslim, who gave a fiery speech at the DNC last week?
It turns out that his speech caused the "Pocket constitution" to become the #2 best-seller on Amazon, right behind the new Harry Potter book. Kind of bizarre that Democrats would be doing the work of promoting the constitution in the year of our lord 2016!
After Khan speech, pocket Constitution becomes best-seller
It turns out that his speech caused the "Pocket constitution" to become the #2 best-seller on Amazon, right behind the new Harry Potter book. Kind of bizarre that Democrats would be doing the work of promoting the constitution in the year of our lord 2016!
After Khan speech, pocket Constitution becomes best-seller
For those moments when you just have to pull out the Constitution at the pub and prove somebody wrong?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2012
- Messages
- 12,741
Fucking Trump. He really cannot get out of his own way and Republicans are starting to make a show of distancing themselves from him. At this point the Russian's could provide audio/video of Hillary giving a direct order to let the ambassador in Benghazi die, and saying "fuck those mercenary's too...let them figure it out."...against Trump no one will care. Damn it.
:wall:
Devildoc
Verified Military
....or people could just buy stuff from Larue and get a copy for free. Win-win.
I like this, in spite of your vicious attack on me personally by disliking my NLF thread post about the Panthers (kidding...).
I think generally you are right...I think that one 'wins' a debate only if the other person follows the script. I don't think Trump will. One will be playing chess, one, checkers. She'll come out with all sorts of policy stuff, he'll just say "because Benghazi". His supporters will eat that up.
Very, very few voters will change their minds because of the debates. Sure, there may be some indies floating around, but not many. Trump could kill puppies on national TV, his people will still vote for him. Clinton can admit full culpability in Benghazi and admit she lost a billion top secret emails, her people will still vote for her.
Last edited by a moderator:
Single Malt
Unverified
Every naturalized citizen is given a pocket constitution, I wonder if the one he pulled out was the one he was given when he became a citizen (not sure if he was naturalized but going off the probability).
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2008
- Messages
- 1,068
Clinton took $100k cash from & was director of company that gave money to ISIS Paris strikes astonishing partnership with secret Isis sponsor tied to Hillary Clinton [EXCLUSIVE] | The Canary docs: Search WikiLeaks
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 1, 2016
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 1, 2016
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2012
- Messages
- 12,741
I am beginning to believe that this could be one of the lowest voter turnouts in election history. Aside from the over-the-top "Trump/Hillary can do no wrong crowd", the more rational people I know are similar to me. No clue WTF to do in November - see so much baggage in both candidates that even voting seems a hopeless waste of time.
I'm going with a third party or write-in vote because I think this country needs a revolution at the polls. If we're unwilling to check our country's decline then we deserve whatever happens in the next 20-30 years. Voting for an incumbent, hell, even voting for someone within the system is a vote for the status quo.
Leave the Presidential choice empty and vote for the other candidates and issues.
Brill
SOF Support
Not voting is a vote for Hillary. Her organization and ability to get votes counted is unmatched.
The ONLY way We the People can win is vote Johnson in high enough numbers to cause a delay in the count.
My premise is a delay would indicate the Democrats needed more time to readjust their vote count. Oh, she'll "win" but by just enough to appear legit.
The ONLY way We the People can win is vote Johnson in high enough numbers to cause a delay in the count.
My premise is a delay would indicate the Democrats needed more time to readjust their vote count. Oh, she'll "win" but by just enough to appear legit.
In 1992. That's like saying the current directors of IBM should be held to account for the help IBM gave to Nazi Germany.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2008
- Messages
- 1,068
No, that's not at all comparable as it wasn't that long ago. If this were the 1960s and the directors of IBM were running for office, then maybe it'd be comparable... and in that case, yes, it'd be scandalous to put them in office.
Clinton was just the director of Lafarge in 1992. That doesn't mean their ties ended there. They are still closely linked to the Clinton Foundation.
How can you read everything in the text below and not at least think, what the fuck?
Regardless, there's bigger stuff than that coming up.
- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knew that the US was sending arms from Libya to Syria back in 2011, a year before the Benghazi consulate attacks.
- Hillary Clinton denied she knew about the weapons shipments during public testimony (under oath) in early 2013 after the Benghazi terrorist attack.
- Senator Rand Paul questioned Hillary Clinton about this gun running program back in January 2013 during her testimony on the Benghazi terrorist attack.
On Tuesday Julian Assange told Democracy Now that the Wikileaks DNC emails contains information on the weapons shipments to Syria.
Julian Assange: So, those Hillary Clinton emails, they connect together with the cables that we have published of Hillary Clinton, creating a rich picture of how Hillary Clinton performs in office, but, more broadly, how the U.S. Department of State operates. So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails. There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone.
Last edited by a moderator:
No, the current directors were not personally involved in helping the Nazis. Hillary was directly involved in LaFarge and was on the board when they were assisting ISIS, although at the end of it, as well as continuing to accept donations to her foundation from them now. The difference? Hillary is personally involved.
That's not what I read at all. Unless I missed something, she left the board of directors almost 20 years before ISIS even existed. Yes, they donated to the Clinton foundation regularly, but fuck, a lot of people did. The foundation has reportedly raised $2 billion as of 2016. That means that a lot of people donated to them. Yeah, some are probably not super savory, but that's not indicative of wrongdoing. The link proffered in that leak is super tenuous and a really big stretch.
Deathy got in there before I could.
Oops, meant facilitating the CIA arms trade to Saddam, not ISIS while she was on the board.
I really like the twists and turns with Hilary that gets thrown up here, it's way past being a spectator sport.
Government policy, no?
- Status
Similar threads
