Full study link for anyone unable to get to greyman briefing:
Safety of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine in Children Aged 5 to 17 Years
Its interesting that the study specifically says: "This cohort study monitored 20 health outcomes in near real time and identified a safety signal only for myocarditis or pericarditis, which was consistent with other published reports. These results provide additional evidence for the
safety of the COVID-19 vaccines in the pediatric population."
If this study along with other studies are confirming that myocarditis is a statistically significant event for the vaccine, why is it considered safe? Acceptable losses?
Regardless, the mounting evidence that the vaccine is not as safe or effective as advertised is overwhelming and I'll admit that I was wrong about it. I thought it was receiving backlash because it was a new technology (mRNA) and conspiracy nuts were taking off with it. But, turns out, I put too much faith in the government. Huge shout out to all of you on here still having this discussion and bringing to light the bullshit thats been forced down our throats for the last few years.